THE SUCCESS OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED INSERTION OF CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER VERSUS LANDMARK TECHNIQUE

Objective: Central venous catheterization is an important skill for doctors working in the departments of medicine, surgery, critical care, anesthesiology, and emergency. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, USA named ultrasound guidance of central venous catheter placement as one of 11 m...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Bilal Munir, Fahim Ullah Naz, Salman Saleem, Amna Khalid, Adnan Aqil Khan, Hassan Ud Din
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Army Medical College Rawalpindi 2021
Materias:	central venous catherisation (cvc) ultrasonography (usg) landmark technique Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/0679892cbf1947a0aa5d381f07026181
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:0679892cbf1947a0aa5d381f07026181
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:0679892cbf1947a0aa5d381f070261812021-12-02T18:01:28ZTHE SUCCESS OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED INSERTION OF CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER VERSUS LANDMARK TECHNIQUE0030-96482411-884210.51253/pafmj.v71i1.3135https://doaj.org/article/0679892cbf1947a0aa5d381f070261812021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/3135https://doaj.org/toc/0030-9648https://doaj.org/toc/2411-8842Objective: Central venous catheterization is an important skill for doctors working in the departments of medicine, surgery, critical care, anesthesiology, and emergency. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, USA named ultrasound guidance of central venous catheter placement as one of 11 most underutilized practices that can enhance patient safety with greatest strength of evidence to provide clear opportunities for safety improvement. In this study, we compare the success of ultrasound-guided insertion of central venous catheter versus landmark technique. Study Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial. Place and Duration of Study: Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, from Jul to Dec 2016. Methodology: One hundred twenty patients admitted in its wards and undergone CVC were included. Patients were divided into group A & group B containing 60 patients each. In ‘group A’ CVC was done with ultrasound assistance while in ‘group B’ CVC was done with landmark technique. The primary study outcome was No. of attempts at which CVC was done. Results: In this study, 120 patients were enrolled. There was no difference in demographic data comparison. Success rate was found to be 28 (46.67%) in-group A while 16 (26.67%) in-group B with the p-value of 0.042 which is significant. Conclusion: We concluded that CVC with ultrasound guidance is more successful than landmark technique.Bilal MunirFahim Ullah NazSalman SaleemAmna KhalidAdnan Aqil KhanHassan Ud DinArmy Medical College Rawalpindiarticlecentral venous catherisation (cvc)ultrasonography (usg)landmark techniqueMedicineRMedicine (General)R5-920ENPakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, Vol 71, Iss 1, Pp `133-38 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	central venous catherisation (cvc) ultrasonography (usg) landmark technique Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920
spellingShingle	central venous catherisation (cvc) ultrasonography (usg) landmark technique Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920 Bilal Munir Fahim Ullah Naz Salman Saleem Amna Khalid Adnan Aqil Khan Hassan Ud Din THE SUCCESS OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED INSERTION OF CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER VERSUS LANDMARK TECHNIQUE
description	Objective: Central venous catheterization is an important skill for doctors working in the departments of medicine, surgery, critical care, anesthesiology, and emergency. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, USA named ultrasound guidance of central venous catheter placement as one of 11 most underutilized practices that can enhance patient safety with greatest strength of evidence to provide clear opportunities for safety improvement. In this study, we compare the success of ultrasound-guided insertion of central venous catheter versus landmark technique. Study Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial. Place and Duration of Study: Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, from Jul to Dec 2016. Methodology: One hundred twenty patients admitted in its wards and undergone CVC were included. Patients were divided into group A & group B containing 60 patients each. In ‘group A’ CVC was done with ultrasound assistance while in ‘group B’ CVC was done with landmark technique. The primary study outcome was No. of attempts at which CVC was done. Results: In this study, 120 patients were enrolled. There was no difference in demographic data comparison. Success rate was found to be 28 (46.67%) in-group A while 16 (26.67%) in-group B with the p-value of 0.042 which is significant. Conclusion: We concluded that CVC with ultrasound guidance is more successful than landmark technique.
format	article
author	Bilal Munir Fahim Ullah Naz Salman Saleem Amna Khalid Adnan Aqil Khan Hassan Ud Din
author_facet	Bilal Munir Fahim Ullah Naz Salman Saleem Amna Khalid Adnan Aqil Khan Hassan Ud Din
author_sort	Bilal Munir
title	THE SUCCESS OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED INSERTION OF CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER VERSUS LANDMARK TECHNIQUE
title_short	THE SUCCESS OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED INSERTION OF CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER VERSUS LANDMARK TECHNIQUE
title_full	THE SUCCESS OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED INSERTION OF CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER VERSUS LANDMARK TECHNIQUE
title_fullStr	THE SUCCESS OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED INSERTION OF CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER VERSUS LANDMARK TECHNIQUE
title_full_unstemmed	THE SUCCESS OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED INSERTION OF CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER VERSUS LANDMARK TECHNIQUE
title_sort	success of ultrasound guided insertion of central venous catheter versus landmark technique
publisher	Army Medical College Rawalpindi
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/0679892cbf1947a0aa5d381f07026181
work_keys_str_mv	AT bilalmunir thesuccessofultrasoundguidedinsertionofcentralvenouscatheterversuslandmarktechnique AT fahimullahnaz thesuccessofultrasoundguidedinsertionofcentralvenouscatheterversuslandmarktechnique AT salmansaleem thesuccessofultrasoundguidedinsertionofcentralvenouscatheterversuslandmarktechnique AT amnakhalid thesuccessofultrasoundguidedinsertionofcentralvenouscatheterversuslandmarktechnique AT adnanaqilkhan thesuccessofultrasoundguidedinsertionofcentralvenouscatheterversuslandmarktechnique AT hassanuddin thesuccessofultrasoundguidedinsertionofcentralvenouscatheterversuslandmarktechnique AT bilalmunir successofultrasoundguidedinsertionofcentralvenouscatheterversuslandmarktechnique AT fahimullahnaz successofultrasoundguidedinsertionofcentralvenouscatheterversuslandmarktechnique AT salmansaleem successofultrasoundguidedinsertionofcentralvenouscatheterversuslandmarktechnique AT amnakhalid successofultrasoundguidedinsertionofcentralvenouscatheterversuslandmarktechnique AT adnanaqilkhan successofultrasoundguidedinsertionofcentralvenouscatheterversuslandmarktechnique AT hassanuddin successofultrasoundguidedinsertionofcentralvenouscatheterversuslandmarktechnique
_version_	1718378967704010752

THE SUCCESS OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED INSERTION OF CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER VERSUS LANDMARK TECHNIQUE

Ejemplares similares