Testing scientific models using Qualitative Reasoning: Application to cellulose hydrolysis

Abstract With the accumulation of scientific information in natural science, even experts can find difficult to keep integrating new piece of information. It is critical to explore modelling solutions able to capture information scattered in publications as a computable representation form. Traditio...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamal Kansou, Caroline Rémond, Gabriel Paës, Estelle Bonnin, Jean Tayeb, Bert Bredeweg
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/06bca319873d4aa2bbe155c20a0d778d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:06bca319873d4aa2bbe155c20a0d778d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:06bca319873d4aa2bbe155c20a0d778d2021-12-02T15:06:07ZTesting scientific models using Qualitative Reasoning: Application to cellulose hydrolysis10.1038/s41598-017-14281-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/06bca319873d4aa2bbe155c20a0d778d2017-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14281-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract With the accumulation of scientific information in natural science, even experts can find difficult to keep integrating new piece of information. It is critical to explore modelling solutions able to capture information scattered in publications as a computable representation form. Traditional modelling techniques are important in that regard, but relying on numerical information comes with limitations for integrating results from distinct studies, high-level representations can be more suited. We present an approach to stepwise construct mechanistic explanation from selected scientific papers using the Qualitative Reasoning framework. As a proof of concept, we apply the approach to modelling papers about cellulose hydrolysis mechanism, focusing on the causal explanations for the decreasing of hydrolytic rate. Two explanatory QR models are built to capture classical explanations for the phenomenon. Our results show that none of them provides sufficient explanation for a set of basic experimental observations described in the literature. Combining the two explanations into a third one allowed to get a new and sufficient explanation for the experimental results. In domains where numerical data are scarce and strongly related to the experimental conditions, this approach can aid assessing the conceptual validity of an explanation and support integration of knowledge from different sources.Kamal KansouCaroline RémondGabriel PaësEstelle BonninJean TayebBert BredewegNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-18 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Kamal Kansou
Caroline Rémond
Gabriel Paës
Estelle Bonnin
Jean Tayeb
Bert Bredeweg
Testing scientific models using Qualitative Reasoning: Application to cellulose hydrolysis
description Abstract With the accumulation of scientific information in natural science, even experts can find difficult to keep integrating new piece of information. It is critical to explore modelling solutions able to capture information scattered in publications as a computable representation form. Traditional modelling techniques are important in that regard, but relying on numerical information comes with limitations for integrating results from distinct studies, high-level representations can be more suited. We present an approach to stepwise construct mechanistic explanation from selected scientific papers using the Qualitative Reasoning framework. As a proof of concept, we apply the approach to modelling papers about cellulose hydrolysis mechanism, focusing on the causal explanations for the decreasing of hydrolytic rate. Two explanatory QR models are built to capture classical explanations for the phenomenon. Our results show that none of them provides sufficient explanation for a set of basic experimental observations described in the literature. Combining the two explanations into a third one allowed to get a new and sufficient explanation for the experimental results. In domains where numerical data are scarce and strongly related to the experimental conditions, this approach can aid assessing the conceptual validity of an explanation and support integration of knowledge from different sources.
format article
author Kamal Kansou
Caroline Rémond
Gabriel Paës
Estelle Bonnin
Jean Tayeb
Bert Bredeweg
author_facet Kamal Kansou
Caroline Rémond
Gabriel Paës
Estelle Bonnin
Jean Tayeb
Bert Bredeweg
author_sort Kamal Kansou
title Testing scientific models using Qualitative Reasoning: Application to cellulose hydrolysis
title_short Testing scientific models using Qualitative Reasoning: Application to cellulose hydrolysis
title_full Testing scientific models using Qualitative Reasoning: Application to cellulose hydrolysis
title_fullStr Testing scientific models using Qualitative Reasoning: Application to cellulose hydrolysis
title_full_unstemmed Testing scientific models using Qualitative Reasoning: Application to cellulose hydrolysis
title_sort testing scientific models using qualitative reasoning: application to cellulose hydrolysis
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/06bca319873d4aa2bbe155c20a0d778d
work_keys_str_mv AT kamalkansou testingscientificmodelsusingqualitativereasoningapplicationtocellulosehydrolysis
AT carolineremond testingscientificmodelsusingqualitativereasoningapplicationtocellulosehydrolysis
AT gabrielpaes testingscientificmodelsusingqualitativereasoningapplicationtocellulosehydrolysis
AT estellebonnin testingscientificmodelsusingqualitativereasoningapplicationtocellulosehydrolysis
AT jeantayeb testingscientificmodelsusingqualitativereasoningapplicationtocellulosehydrolysis
AT bertbredeweg testingscientificmodelsusingqualitativereasoningapplicationtocellulosehydrolysis
_version_ 1718388558792753152