Retrospective and current trend of wild‐cat trade in Peru

Abstract Several species of wild cats are threatened with extinction due to habitat loss, persecution or retaliatory killing by humans as a result of real or perceived livestock depredation, and illegal trade. The trade of individuals or their parts has been a recurring threat over the years, especi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: José Luis Mena, Rosa Vento, Jorge Luis Martínez, Ana Gallegos
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wiley 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/06eeb40c12344052b0ba128b460aa31e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:06eeb40c12344052b0ba128b460aa31e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:06eeb40c12344052b0ba128b460aa31e2021-12-01T10:20:56ZRetrospective and current trend of wild‐cat trade in Peru2578-485410.1111/csp2.558https://doaj.org/article/06eeb40c12344052b0ba128b460aa31e2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.558https://doaj.org/toc/2578-4854Abstract Several species of wild cats are threatened with extinction due to habitat loss, persecution or retaliatory killing by humans as a result of real or perceived livestock depredation, and illegal trade. The trade of individuals or their parts has been a recurring threat over the years, especially prior to the establishment of CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) in 1975. We assessed the extent of trade of wild cats in Peru (eight species) using export records available from 1946 to 1973, before the establishment of CITES and after the implementation of CITES using confiscation data available for 2001–2020. The ocelot and the jaguar were the most exploited species for their skins in the pre‐CITES period, with 228,376 and 17,301 individuals, respectively; as well as post‐CITES, although at significantly lower levels, with 67 individuals and 107 body parts, and 27 individuals and 99 body parts, respectively. Post‐CITES trade, however, shows an increasing trend for the jaguar and all wild cat species. Currently in Peru, the illegal wildlife trade is considered opportunistic, but its impact on wild populations has not been properly documented. We recommend improving knowledge regarding population status of wild cats to inform conservation status, and to increase efforts to reduce illegal trade at both national and regional level.José Luis MenaRosa VentoJorge Luis MartínezAna GallegosWileyarticlefelidsillegaljaguarocelotPeruwildlife tradeEcologyQH540-549.5General. Including nature conservation, geographical distributionQH1-199.5ENConservation Science and Practice, Vol 3, Iss 12, Pp n/a-n/a (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic felids
illegal
jaguar
ocelot
Peru
wildlife trade
Ecology
QH540-549.5
General. Including nature conservation, geographical distribution
QH1-199.5
spellingShingle felids
illegal
jaguar
ocelot
Peru
wildlife trade
Ecology
QH540-549.5
General. Including nature conservation, geographical distribution
QH1-199.5
José Luis Mena
Rosa Vento
Jorge Luis Martínez
Ana Gallegos
Retrospective and current trend of wild‐cat trade in Peru
description Abstract Several species of wild cats are threatened with extinction due to habitat loss, persecution or retaliatory killing by humans as a result of real or perceived livestock depredation, and illegal trade. The trade of individuals or their parts has been a recurring threat over the years, especially prior to the establishment of CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) in 1975. We assessed the extent of trade of wild cats in Peru (eight species) using export records available from 1946 to 1973, before the establishment of CITES and after the implementation of CITES using confiscation data available for 2001–2020. The ocelot and the jaguar were the most exploited species for their skins in the pre‐CITES period, with 228,376 and 17,301 individuals, respectively; as well as post‐CITES, although at significantly lower levels, with 67 individuals and 107 body parts, and 27 individuals and 99 body parts, respectively. Post‐CITES trade, however, shows an increasing trend for the jaguar and all wild cat species. Currently in Peru, the illegal wildlife trade is considered opportunistic, but its impact on wild populations has not been properly documented. We recommend improving knowledge regarding population status of wild cats to inform conservation status, and to increase efforts to reduce illegal trade at both national and regional level.
format article
author José Luis Mena
Rosa Vento
Jorge Luis Martínez
Ana Gallegos
author_facet José Luis Mena
Rosa Vento
Jorge Luis Martínez
Ana Gallegos
author_sort José Luis Mena
title Retrospective and current trend of wild‐cat trade in Peru
title_short Retrospective and current trend of wild‐cat trade in Peru
title_full Retrospective and current trend of wild‐cat trade in Peru
title_fullStr Retrospective and current trend of wild‐cat trade in Peru
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective and current trend of wild‐cat trade in Peru
title_sort retrospective and current trend of wild‐cat trade in peru
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/06eeb40c12344052b0ba128b460aa31e
work_keys_str_mv AT joseluismena retrospectiveandcurrenttrendofwildcattradeinperu
AT rosavento retrospectiveandcurrenttrendofwildcattradeinperu
AT jorgeluismartinez retrospectiveandcurrenttrendofwildcattradeinperu
AT anagallegos retrospectiveandcurrenttrendofwildcattradeinperu
_version_ 1718405275628601344