A comparison of wood density between classical Cremonese and modern violins.

Classical violins created by Cremonese masters, such as Antonio Stradivari and Giuseppe Guarneri Del Gesu, have become the benchmark to which the sound of all violins are compared in terms of their abilities of expressiveness and projection. By general consensus, no luthier since that time has been...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berend C Stoel, Terry M Borman
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2008
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/070f7e6704444456832dafcce047166b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:070f7e6704444456832dafcce047166b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:070f7e6704444456832dafcce047166b2021-11-25T06:11:49ZA comparison of wood density between classical Cremonese and modern violins.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0002554https://doaj.org/article/070f7e6704444456832dafcce047166b2008-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/18596937/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Classical violins created by Cremonese masters, such as Antonio Stradivari and Giuseppe Guarneri Del Gesu, have become the benchmark to which the sound of all violins are compared in terms of their abilities of expressiveness and projection. By general consensus, no luthier since that time has been able to replicate the sound quality of these classical instruments. The vibration and sound radiation characteristics of a violin are determined by an instrument's geometry and the material properties of the wood. New test methods allow the non-destructive examination of one of the key material properties, the wood density, at the growth ring level of detail. The densities of five classical and eight modern violins were compared, using computed tomography and specially developed image-processing software. No significant differences were found between the median densities of the modern and the antique violins, however the density difference between wood grains of early and late growth was significantly smaller in the classical Cremonese violins compared with modern violins, in both the top (Spruce) and back (Maple) plates (p = 0.028 and 0.008, respectively). The mean density differential (SE) of the top plates of the modern and classical violins was 274 (26.6) and 183 (11.7) gram/liter. For the back plates, the values were 128 (2.6) and 115 (2.0) gram/liter. These differences in density differentials may reflect similar changes in stiffness distributions, which could directly impact vibrational efficacy or indirectly modify sound radiation via altered damping characteristics. Either of these mechanisms may help explain the acoustical differences between the classical and modern violins.Berend C StoelTerry M BormanPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 3, Iss 7, p e2554 (2008)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Berend C Stoel
Terry M Borman
A comparison of wood density between classical Cremonese and modern violins.
description Classical violins created by Cremonese masters, such as Antonio Stradivari and Giuseppe Guarneri Del Gesu, have become the benchmark to which the sound of all violins are compared in terms of their abilities of expressiveness and projection. By general consensus, no luthier since that time has been able to replicate the sound quality of these classical instruments. The vibration and sound radiation characteristics of a violin are determined by an instrument's geometry and the material properties of the wood. New test methods allow the non-destructive examination of one of the key material properties, the wood density, at the growth ring level of detail. The densities of five classical and eight modern violins were compared, using computed tomography and specially developed image-processing software. No significant differences were found between the median densities of the modern and the antique violins, however the density difference between wood grains of early and late growth was significantly smaller in the classical Cremonese violins compared with modern violins, in both the top (Spruce) and back (Maple) plates (p = 0.028 and 0.008, respectively). The mean density differential (SE) of the top plates of the modern and classical violins was 274 (26.6) and 183 (11.7) gram/liter. For the back plates, the values were 128 (2.6) and 115 (2.0) gram/liter. These differences in density differentials may reflect similar changes in stiffness distributions, which could directly impact vibrational efficacy or indirectly modify sound radiation via altered damping characteristics. Either of these mechanisms may help explain the acoustical differences between the classical and modern violins.
format article
author Berend C Stoel
Terry M Borman
author_facet Berend C Stoel
Terry M Borman
author_sort Berend C Stoel
title A comparison of wood density between classical Cremonese and modern violins.
title_short A comparison of wood density between classical Cremonese and modern violins.
title_full A comparison of wood density between classical Cremonese and modern violins.
title_fullStr A comparison of wood density between classical Cremonese and modern violins.
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of wood density between classical Cremonese and modern violins.
title_sort comparison of wood density between classical cremonese and modern violins.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2008
url https://doaj.org/article/070f7e6704444456832dafcce047166b
work_keys_str_mv AT berendcstoel acomparisonofwooddensitybetweenclassicalcremoneseandmodernviolins
AT terrymborman acomparisonofwooddensitybetweenclassicalcremoneseandmodernviolins
AT berendcstoel comparisonofwooddensitybetweenclassicalcremoneseandmodernviolins
AT terrymborman comparisonofwooddensitybetweenclassicalcremoneseandmodernviolins
_version_ 1718414023969472512