Assigning the right credit to the wrong action: compulsivity in the general population is associated with augmented outcome-irrelevant value-based learning

Abstract Compulsive behavior is enacted under a belief that a specific act controls the likelihood of an undesired future event. Compulsive behaviors are widespread in the general population despite having no causal relationship with events they aspire to influence. In the current study, we tested w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nitzan Shahar, Tobias U. Hauser, Rani Moran, Michael Moutoussis, NSPN consortium, Edward T. Bullmore, Raymond J. Dolan
Format: article
Language:EN
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/0751085565d7490b93c7fe66f00e19a0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0751085565d7490b93c7fe66f00e19a0
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0751085565d7490b93c7fe66f00e19a02021-11-07T12:17:42ZAssigning the right credit to the wrong action: compulsivity in the general population is associated with augmented outcome-irrelevant value-based learning10.1038/s41398-021-01642-x2158-3188https://doaj.org/article/0751085565d7490b93c7fe66f00e19a02021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01642-xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2158-3188Abstract Compulsive behavior is enacted under a belief that a specific act controls the likelihood of an undesired future event. Compulsive behaviors are widespread in the general population despite having no causal relationship with events they aspire to influence. In the current study, we tested whether there is an increased tendency to assign value to aspects of a task that do not predict an outcome (i.e., outcome-irrelevant learning) among individuals with compulsive tendencies. We studied 514 healthy individuals who completed self-report compulsivity, anxiety, depression, and schizotypal measurements, and a well-established reinforcement-learning task (i.e., the two-step task). As expected, we found a positive relationship between compulsivity and outcome-irrelevant learning. Specifically, individuals who reported having stronger compulsive tendencies (e.g., washing, checking, grooming) also tended to assign value to response keys and stimuli locations that did not predict an outcome. Controlling for overall goal-directed abilities and the co-occurrence of anxious, depressive, or schizotypal tendencies did not impact these associations. These findings indicate that outcome-irrelevant learning processes may contribute to the expression of compulsivity in a general population setting. We highlight the need for future research on the formation of non-veridical action−outcome associations as a factor related to the occurrence and maintenance of compulsive behavior.Nitzan ShaharTobias U. HauserRani MoranMichael MoutoussisNSPN consortiumEdward T. BullmoreRaymond J. DolanNature Publishing GrouparticleNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571ENTranslational Psychiatry, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
spellingShingle Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Nitzan Shahar
Tobias U. Hauser
Rani Moran
Michael Moutoussis
NSPN consortium
Edward T. Bullmore
Raymond J. Dolan
Assigning the right credit to the wrong action: compulsivity in the general population is associated with augmented outcome-irrelevant value-based learning
description Abstract Compulsive behavior is enacted under a belief that a specific act controls the likelihood of an undesired future event. Compulsive behaviors are widespread in the general population despite having no causal relationship with events they aspire to influence. In the current study, we tested whether there is an increased tendency to assign value to aspects of a task that do not predict an outcome (i.e., outcome-irrelevant learning) among individuals with compulsive tendencies. We studied 514 healthy individuals who completed self-report compulsivity, anxiety, depression, and schizotypal measurements, and a well-established reinforcement-learning task (i.e., the two-step task). As expected, we found a positive relationship between compulsivity and outcome-irrelevant learning. Specifically, individuals who reported having stronger compulsive tendencies (e.g., washing, checking, grooming) also tended to assign value to response keys and stimuli locations that did not predict an outcome. Controlling for overall goal-directed abilities and the co-occurrence of anxious, depressive, or schizotypal tendencies did not impact these associations. These findings indicate that outcome-irrelevant learning processes may contribute to the expression of compulsivity in a general population setting. We highlight the need for future research on the formation of non-veridical action−outcome associations as a factor related to the occurrence and maintenance of compulsive behavior.
format article
author Nitzan Shahar
Tobias U. Hauser
Rani Moran
Michael Moutoussis
NSPN consortium
Edward T. Bullmore
Raymond J. Dolan
author_facet Nitzan Shahar
Tobias U. Hauser
Rani Moran
Michael Moutoussis
NSPN consortium
Edward T. Bullmore
Raymond J. Dolan
author_sort Nitzan Shahar
title Assigning the right credit to the wrong action: compulsivity in the general population is associated with augmented outcome-irrelevant value-based learning
title_short Assigning the right credit to the wrong action: compulsivity in the general population is associated with augmented outcome-irrelevant value-based learning
title_full Assigning the right credit to the wrong action: compulsivity in the general population is associated with augmented outcome-irrelevant value-based learning
title_fullStr Assigning the right credit to the wrong action: compulsivity in the general population is associated with augmented outcome-irrelevant value-based learning
title_full_unstemmed Assigning the right credit to the wrong action: compulsivity in the general population is associated with augmented outcome-irrelevant value-based learning
title_sort assigning the right credit to the wrong action: compulsivity in the general population is associated with augmented outcome-irrelevant value-based learning
publisher Nature Publishing Group
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/0751085565d7490b93c7fe66f00e19a0
work_keys_str_mv AT nitzanshahar assigningtherightcredittothewrongactioncompulsivityinthegeneralpopulationisassociatedwithaugmentedoutcomeirrelevantvaluebasedlearning
AT tobiasuhauser assigningtherightcredittothewrongactioncompulsivityinthegeneralpopulationisassociatedwithaugmentedoutcomeirrelevantvaluebasedlearning
AT ranimoran assigningtherightcredittothewrongactioncompulsivityinthegeneralpopulationisassociatedwithaugmentedoutcomeirrelevantvaluebasedlearning
AT michaelmoutoussis assigningtherightcredittothewrongactioncompulsivityinthegeneralpopulationisassociatedwithaugmentedoutcomeirrelevantvaluebasedlearning
AT nspnconsortium assigningtherightcredittothewrongactioncompulsivityinthegeneralpopulationisassociatedwithaugmentedoutcomeirrelevantvaluebasedlearning
AT edwardtbullmore assigningtherightcredittothewrongactioncompulsivityinthegeneralpopulationisassociatedwithaugmentedoutcomeirrelevantvaluebasedlearning
AT raymondjdolan assigningtherightcredittothewrongactioncompulsivityinthegeneralpopulationisassociatedwithaugmentedoutcomeirrelevantvaluebasedlearning
_version_ 1718443463631962112