Seabird species vary in behavioural response to drone census

Abstract Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) provide an opportunity to rapidly census wildlife in remote areas while removing some of the hazards. However, wildlife may respond negatively to the UAVs, thereby skewing counts. We surveyed four species of Arctic cliff-nesting seabirds (glaucous gull Larus...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Émile Brisson-Curadeau, David Bird, Chantelle Burke, David A. Fifield, Paul Pace, Richard B. Sherley, Kyle H. Elliott
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/07d7ebd1a9f8488e8b2c7c5abe792aaf
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:07d7ebd1a9f8488e8b2c7c5abe792aaf
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:07d7ebd1a9f8488e8b2c7c5abe792aaf2021-12-02T15:05:20ZSeabird species vary in behavioural response to drone census10.1038/s41598-017-18202-32045-2322https://doaj.org/article/07d7ebd1a9f8488e8b2c7c5abe792aaf2017-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18202-3https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) provide an opportunity to rapidly census wildlife in remote areas while removing some of the hazards. However, wildlife may respond negatively to the UAVs, thereby skewing counts. We surveyed four species of Arctic cliff-nesting seabirds (glaucous gull Larus hyperboreus, Iceland gull Larus glaucoides, common murre Uria aalge and thick-billed murre Uria lomvia) using a UAV and compared censusing techniques to ground photography. An average of 8.5% of murres flew off in response to the UAV, but >99% of those birds were non-breeders. We were unable to detect any impact of the UAV on breeding success of murres, except at a site where aerial predators were abundant and several birds lost their eggs to predators following UAV flights. Furthermore, we found little evidence for habituation by murres to the UAV. Most gulls flew off in response to the UAV, but returned to the nest within five minutes. Counts of gull nests and adults were similar between UAV and ground photography, however the UAV detected up to 52.4% more chicks because chicks were camouflaged and invisible to ground observers. UAVs provide a less hazardous and potentially more accurate method for surveying wildlife. We provide some simple recommendations for their use.Émile Brisson-CuradeauDavid BirdChantelle BurkeDavid A. FifieldPaul PaceRichard B. SherleyKyle H. ElliottNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Émile Brisson-Curadeau
David Bird
Chantelle Burke
David A. Fifield
Paul Pace
Richard B. Sherley
Kyle H. Elliott
Seabird species vary in behavioural response to drone census
description Abstract Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) provide an opportunity to rapidly census wildlife in remote areas while removing some of the hazards. However, wildlife may respond negatively to the UAVs, thereby skewing counts. We surveyed four species of Arctic cliff-nesting seabirds (glaucous gull Larus hyperboreus, Iceland gull Larus glaucoides, common murre Uria aalge and thick-billed murre Uria lomvia) using a UAV and compared censusing techniques to ground photography. An average of 8.5% of murres flew off in response to the UAV, but >99% of those birds were non-breeders. We were unable to detect any impact of the UAV on breeding success of murres, except at a site where aerial predators were abundant and several birds lost their eggs to predators following UAV flights. Furthermore, we found little evidence for habituation by murres to the UAV. Most gulls flew off in response to the UAV, but returned to the nest within five minutes. Counts of gull nests and adults were similar between UAV and ground photography, however the UAV detected up to 52.4% more chicks because chicks were camouflaged and invisible to ground observers. UAVs provide a less hazardous and potentially more accurate method for surveying wildlife. We provide some simple recommendations for their use.
format article
author Émile Brisson-Curadeau
David Bird
Chantelle Burke
David A. Fifield
Paul Pace
Richard B. Sherley
Kyle H. Elliott
author_facet Émile Brisson-Curadeau
David Bird
Chantelle Burke
David A. Fifield
Paul Pace
Richard B. Sherley
Kyle H. Elliott
author_sort Émile Brisson-Curadeau
title Seabird species vary in behavioural response to drone census
title_short Seabird species vary in behavioural response to drone census
title_full Seabird species vary in behavioural response to drone census
title_fullStr Seabird species vary in behavioural response to drone census
title_full_unstemmed Seabird species vary in behavioural response to drone census
title_sort seabird species vary in behavioural response to drone census
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/07d7ebd1a9f8488e8b2c7c5abe792aaf
work_keys_str_mv AT emilebrissoncuradeau seabirdspeciesvaryinbehaviouralresponsetodronecensus
AT davidbird seabirdspeciesvaryinbehaviouralresponsetodronecensus
AT chantelleburke seabirdspeciesvaryinbehaviouralresponsetodronecensus
AT davidafifield seabirdspeciesvaryinbehaviouralresponsetodronecensus
AT paulpace seabirdspeciesvaryinbehaviouralresponsetodronecensus
AT richardbsherley seabirdspeciesvaryinbehaviouralresponsetodronecensus
AT kylehelliott seabirdspeciesvaryinbehaviouralresponsetodronecensus
_version_ 1718388810929143808