Peer review of grant applications: a simple method to identify proposals with discordant reviews.

Grant proposals submitted for funding are usually selected by a peer-review rating process. Some proposals may result in discordant peer-review ratings and therefore require discussion by the selection committee members. The issue is which peer-review ratings are considered as discordant. We propose...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Bruno Giraudeau, Clémence Leyrat, Amélie Le Gouge, Julie Léger, Agnès Caille
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/08073fc95a8146b6aa4f3b92de6a834d
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:08073fc95a8146b6aa4f3b92de6a834d
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:08073fc95a8146b6aa4f3b92de6a834d2021-11-18T07:34:22ZPeer review of grant applications: a simple method to identify proposals with discordant reviews.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0027557https://doaj.org/article/08073fc95a8146b6aa4f3b92de6a834d2011-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22110670/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Grant proposals submitted for funding are usually selected by a peer-review rating process. Some proposals may result in discordant peer-review ratings and therefore require discussion by the selection committee members. The issue is which peer-review ratings are considered as discordant. We propose a simple method to identify such proposals. Our approach is based on the intraclass correlation coefficient, which is usually used in assessing agreement in studies with continuous ratings.Bruno GiraudeauClémence LeyratAmélie Le GougeJulie LégerAgnès CaillePublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 6, Iss 11, p e27557 (2011)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Bruno Giraudeau Clémence Leyrat Amélie Le Gouge Julie Léger Agnès Caille Peer review of grant applications: a simple method to identify proposals with discordant reviews.
description	Grant proposals submitted for funding are usually selected by a peer-review rating process. Some proposals may result in discordant peer-review ratings and therefore require discussion by the selection committee members. The issue is which peer-review ratings are considered as discordant. We propose a simple method to identify such proposals. Our approach is based on the intraclass correlation coefficient, which is usually used in assessing agreement in studies with continuous ratings.
format	article
author	Bruno Giraudeau Clémence Leyrat Amélie Le Gouge Julie Léger Agnès Caille
author_facet	Bruno Giraudeau Clémence Leyrat Amélie Le Gouge Julie Léger Agnès Caille
author_sort	Bruno Giraudeau
title	Peer review of grant applications: a simple method to identify proposals with discordant reviews.
title_short	Peer review of grant applications: a simple method to identify proposals with discordant reviews.
title_full	Peer review of grant applications: a simple method to identify proposals with discordant reviews.
title_fullStr	Peer review of grant applications: a simple method to identify proposals with discordant reviews.
title_full_unstemmed	Peer review of grant applications: a simple method to identify proposals with discordant reviews.
title_sort	peer review of grant applications: a simple method to identify proposals with discordant reviews.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2011
url	https://doaj.org/article/08073fc95a8146b6aa4f3b92de6a834d
work_keys_str_mv	AT brunogiraudeau peerreviewofgrantapplicationsasimplemethodtoidentifyproposalswithdiscordantreviews AT clemenceleyrat peerreviewofgrantapplicationsasimplemethodtoidentifyproposalswithdiscordantreviews AT amelielegouge peerreviewofgrantapplicationsasimplemethodtoidentifyproposalswithdiscordantreviews AT julieleger peerreviewofgrantapplicationsasimplemethodtoidentifyproposalswithdiscordantreviews AT agnescaille peerreviewofgrantapplicationsasimplemethodtoidentifyproposalswithdiscordantreviews
_version_	1718423266619555840

Peer review of grant applications: a simple method to identify proposals with discordant reviews.

Ejemplares similares