Peer review of grant applications: a simple method to identify proposals with discordant reviews.
Grant proposals submitted for funding are usually selected by a peer-review rating process. Some proposals may result in discordant peer-review ratings and therefore require discussion by the selection committee members. The issue is which peer-review ratings are considered as discordant. We propose...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Bruno Giraudeau, Clémence Leyrat, Amélie Le Gouge, Julie Léger, Agnès Caille |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/08073fc95a8146b6aa4f3b92de6a834d |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Participant informed consent in cluster randomized trials: review.
por: Bruno Giraudeau, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Transparent Peer Review of Grant Applications
por: Jung Hun Lee, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
An experimental test of the effects of redacting grant applicant identifiers on peer review outcomes
por: Richard K Nakamura, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Mixing nulliparous and multiparous women in randomised controlled trials of preeclampsia prevention is debatable: evidence from a systematic review.
por: Emmanuel Simon, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
REVIEW: Manipulation that we now take for granted
por: Philip Cass
Publicado: (2012)