Peer review of grant applications: a simple method to identify proposals with discordant reviews.
Grant proposals submitted for funding are usually selected by a peer-review rating process. Some proposals may result in discordant peer-review ratings and therefore require discussion by the selection committee members. The issue is which peer-review ratings are considered as discordant. We propose...
Enregistré dans:
Auteurs principaux: | Bruno Giraudeau, Clémence Leyrat, Amélie Le Gouge, Julie Léger, Agnès Caille |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | EN |
Publié: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2011
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/08073fc95a8146b6aa4f3b92de6a834d |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Documents similaires
-
Participant informed consent in cluster randomized trials: review.
par: Bruno Giraudeau, et autres
Publié: (2012) -
Transparent Peer Review of Grant Applications
par: Jung Hun Lee, et autres
Publié: (2021) -
An experimental test of the effects of redacting grant applicant identifiers on peer review outcomes
par: Richard K Nakamura, et autres
Publié: (2021) -
Mixing nulliparous and multiparous women in randomised controlled trials of preeclampsia prevention is debatable: evidence from a systematic review.
par: Emmanuel Simon, et autres
Publié: (2013) -
REVIEW: Manipulation that we now take for granted
par: Philip Cass
Publié: (2012)