To observe and sympathize: “Pseudorealism” and the agenda of the literary magazine “Otechestvennye Zapiski” in the late 1840s — early 1850s

The paper analyzes the literary position of the magazine “Otechestvennye Zapiski” in the late 1840s — early 1850s, expressed in literary-critical declarations and literary texts published on its pages. The article concentrates on the poorly studied novels and stories by Y.P. Butkov, M.M. Dostoevsky...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ekaterina Vozhik
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
RU
Publicado: Russian Academy of Sciences. A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/082fef01ccfa40189181571b0deb2ba2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:082fef01ccfa40189181571b0deb2ba2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:082fef01ccfa40189181571b0deb2ba22021-11-23T08:29:04ZTo observe and sympathize: “Pseudorealism” and the agenda of the literary magazine “Otechestvennye Zapiski” in the late 1840s — early 1850s10.22455/2541-8297-2019-11-416-4302541-82972542-2421https://doaj.org/article/082fef01ccfa40189181571b0deb2ba22019-03-01T00:00:00Zhttp://litfact.ru/images/2019-11/LF-2019-11_416-430_Vozhik.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2541-8297https://doaj.org/toc/2542-2421The paper analyzes the literary position of the magazine “Otechestvennye Zapiski” in the late 1840s — early 1850s, expressed in literary-critical declarations and literary texts published on its pages. The article concentrates on the poorly studied novels and stories by Y.P. Butkov, M.M. Dostoevsky and A.N. Pleshcheyev published in “Otechestvennye Zapiski” in 1848 that were in the limelight during the debates on “pseudorealism” between the magazines “Otechestvennye Zapiski” and “Sovremennik” in the late 1840s — early 1850s. The analysis of these texts allows to specify the source of conflict between the magazines. The polemics was started by the critics from “Sovremennink” — P.V. Annenkov and A.V. Druzhinin. Their articles are compared with other contemporary critical writings, which helps to see the connection between “pseudorealism” and “daguerreotypism” — key concepts for the polemics. The typical structure of “pseudorealistic” works is analyzed to compare the critical responses to such works with the actual state of affairs. The conclusion is made about the correlation among these texts, general aesthetic views of “pseudorealists” and the agenda of “Otechestvennye Zapiski” as a thick literary magazine.Ekaterina VozhikRussian Academy of Sciences. A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literaturearticle“otechestvennye zapiski”“sovremennik”history of russian literaturerealism“pseudorealism”literary criticism“daguerreotypism”Literature (General)PN1-6790Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665ENRUЛитературный факт, Iss 1 (11) , Pp 416-430 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
RU
topic “otechestvennye zapiski”
“sovremennik”
history of russian literature
realism
“pseudorealism”
literary criticism
“daguerreotypism”
Literature (General)
PN1-6790
Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages
PG1-9665
spellingShingle “otechestvennye zapiski”
“sovremennik”
history of russian literature
realism
“pseudorealism”
literary criticism
“daguerreotypism”
Literature (General)
PN1-6790
Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages
PG1-9665
Ekaterina Vozhik
To observe and sympathize: “Pseudorealism” and the agenda of the literary magazine “Otechestvennye Zapiski” in the late 1840s — early 1850s
description The paper analyzes the literary position of the magazine “Otechestvennye Zapiski” in the late 1840s — early 1850s, expressed in literary-critical declarations and literary texts published on its pages. The article concentrates on the poorly studied novels and stories by Y.P. Butkov, M.M. Dostoevsky and A.N. Pleshcheyev published in “Otechestvennye Zapiski” in 1848 that were in the limelight during the debates on “pseudorealism” between the magazines “Otechestvennye Zapiski” and “Sovremennik” in the late 1840s — early 1850s. The analysis of these texts allows to specify the source of conflict between the magazines. The polemics was started by the critics from “Sovremennink” — P.V. Annenkov and A.V. Druzhinin. Their articles are compared with other contemporary critical writings, which helps to see the connection between “pseudorealism” and “daguerreotypism” — key concepts for the polemics. The typical structure of “pseudorealistic” works is analyzed to compare the critical responses to such works with the actual state of affairs. The conclusion is made about the correlation among these texts, general aesthetic views of “pseudorealists” and the agenda of “Otechestvennye Zapiski” as a thick literary magazine.
format article
author Ekaterina Vozhik
author_facet Ekaterina Vozhik
author_sort Ekaterina Vozhik
title To observe and sympathize: “Pseudorealism” and the agenda of the literary magazine “Otechestvennye Zapiski” in the late 1840s — early 1850s
title_short To observe and sympathize: “Pseudorealism” and the agenda of the literary magazine “Otechestvennye Zapiski” in the late 1840s — early 1850s
title_full To observe and sympathize: “Pseudorealism” and the agenda of the literary magazine “Otechestvennye Zapiski” in the late 1840s — early 1850s
title_fullStr To observe and sympathize: “Pseudorealism” and the agenda of the literary magazine “Otechestvennye Zapiski” in the late 1840s — early 1850s
title_full_unstemmed To observe and sympathize: “Pseudorealism” and the agenda of the literary magazine “Otechestvennye Zapiski” in the late 1840s — early 1850s
title_sort to observe and sympathize: “pseudorealism” and the agenda of the literary magazine “otechestvennye zapiski” in the late 1840s — early 1850s
publisher Russian Academy of Sciences. A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/082fef01ccfa40189181571b0deb2ba2
work_keys_str_mv AT ekaterinavozhik toobserveandsympathizepseudorealismandtheagendaoftheliterarymagazineotechestvennyezapiskiinthelate1840searly1850s
_version_ 1718416805128568832