Impact of family ownership, management, and generations on IPO underpricing and long-run performance

This paper examines the impact of family ownership, management, and generations on IPO underpricing and the long-run performance of publicly listed firms in Indonesia from 2004 to 2015. This study is based on agency theory, which discusses the relationship between shareholders and management, as wel...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lukas Setia-Atmaja, Yane Chandera
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: LLC "CPC "Business Perspectives" 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/088feb0220d848d0b31644c4ece9e4f4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:088feb0220d848d0b31644c4ece9e4f4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:088feb0220d848d0b31644c4ece9e4f42021-12-01T09:55:54ZImpact of family ownership, management, and generations on IPO underpricing and long-run performance10.21511/imfi.18(4).2021.231810-49671812-9358https://doaj.org/article/088feb0220d848d0b31644c4ece9e4f42021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/15867/IMFI_2021_04_Atmaja.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/1810-4967https://doaj.org/toc/1812-9358This paper examines the impact of family ownership, management, and generations on IPO underpricing and the long-run performance of publicly listed firms in Indonesia from 2004 to 2015. This study is based on agency theory, which discusses the relationship between shareholders and management, as well as controlling and non-controlling shareholders. Study results show that IPO underpricing was 28% higher for family firms than non-family firms. Among family firms, a family member’s presence as a Chief Executive Officer (CEO) significantly reduced the level of IPO underpricing. A negative relationship between family CEO and IPO underpricing was only observed if a CEO at the time of IPO was the founder instead of family descendants. A long-run return of family-firm IPOs was more likely to underperform their non-family-firm counterparts. The findings in the primary market suggest that investors predict bigger issues of agency conflicts between controlling and non-controlling shareholders in family firms than the issues of agency conflicts between shareholders and management in non-family firms. Since investors consider family-firm IPOs to be riskier than non-family firms, they demand a higher level of IPO underpricing to compensate for such risks. The results in the secondary market confirm the findings in the primary market.Lukas Setia-AtmajaYane ChanderaLLC "CPC "Business Perspectives"articlefamily firmsfamily generationsfamily involvementIPO long-run performanceIPO underpricingFinanceHG1-9999ENInvestment Management & Financial Innovations , Vol 18, Iss 4, Pp 266-279 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic family firms
family generations
family involvement
IPO long-run performance
IPO underpricing
Finance
HG1-9999
spellingShingle family firms
family generations
family involvement
IPO long-run performance
IPO underpricing
Finance
HG1-9999
Lukas Setia-Atmaja
Yane Chandera
Impact of family ownership, management, and generations on IPO underpricing and long-run performance
description This paper examines the impact of family ownership, management, and generations on IPO underpricing and the long-run performance of publicly listed firms in Indonesia from 2004 to 2015. This study is based on agency theory, which discusses the relationship between shareholders and management, as well as controlling and non-controlling shareholders. Study results show that IPO underpricing was 28% higher for family firms than non-family firms. Among family firms, a family member’s presence as a Chief Executive Officer (CEO) significantly reduced the level of IPO underpricing. A negative relationship between family CEO and IPO underpricing was only observed if a CEO at the time of IPO was the founder instead of family descendants. A long-run return of family-firm IPOs was more likely to underperform their non-family-firm counterparts. The findings in the primary market suggest that investors predict bigger issues of agency conflicts between controlling and non-controlling shareholders in family firms than the issues of agency conflicts between shareholders and management in non-family firms. Since investors consider family-firm IPOs to be riskier than non-family firms, they demand a higher level of IPO underpricing to compensate for such risks. The results in the secondary market confirm the findings in the primary market.
format article
author Lukas Setia-Atmaja
Yane Chandera
author_facet Lukas Setia-Atmaja
Yane Chandera
author_sort Lukas Setia-Atmaja
title Impact of family ownership, management, and generations on IPO underpricing and long-run performance
title_short Impact of family ownership, management, and generations on IPO underpricing and long-run performance
title_full Impact of family ownership, management, and generations on IPO underpricing and long-run performance
title_fullStr Impact of family ownership, management, and generations on IPO underpricing and long-run performance
title_full_unstemmed Impact of family ownership, management, and generations on IPO underpricing and long-run performance
title_sort impact of family ownership, management, and generations on ipo underpricing and long-run performance
publisher LLC "CPC "Business Perspectives"
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/088feb0220d848d0b31644c4ece9e4f4
work_keys_str_mv AT lukassetiaatmaja impactoffamilyownershipmanagementandgenerationsonipounderpricingandlongrunperformance
AT yanechandera impactoffamilyownershipmanagementandgenerationsonipounderpricingandlongrunperformance
_version_ 1718405276403499008