Comparison of the efficiency and treatment outcome of patients treated with corticotomy-assisted En masse orthodontic retraction with the en masse retraction without corticotomy

Background: Corticotomy in fixed orthodontic treatment gives a potential approach to reduce the treatment duration. Typically, this duration of rapid tooth movement lasts 4–6 months. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the treatment outcome and effectiveness in en masse retraction with and wit...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Shubham Kumar, Saurav Kumar, Nadira Hassan, Sabika Mazhar, Ravi Anjan, Bharti Anand
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021
Materias:	corticotomy orthodontic retraction orthodontics Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/08b1485c7ee64e2e9f5d13232c09f3a5
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:08b1485c7ee64e2e9f5d13232c09f3a5
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:08b1485c7ee64e2e9f5d13232c09f3a52021-11-19T12:15:52ZComparison of the efficiency and treatment outcome of patients treated with corticotomy-assisted En masse orthodontic retraction with the en masse retraction without corticotomy0975-740610.4103/jpbs.jpbs_140_21https://doaj.org/article/08b1485c7ee64e2e9f5d13232c09f3a52021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=1320;epage=1323;aulast=Kumarhttps://doaj.org/toc/0975-7406Background: Corticotomy in fixed orthodontic treatment gives a potential approach to reduce the treatment duration. Typically, this duration of rapid tooth movement lasts 4–6 months. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the treatment outcome and effectiveness in en masse retraction with and without corticotomy. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two patients (male 16 and female 16) who opted to undergo surgery to reduce the orthodontic treatment time were chosen for the research, and the group consisted of 26 patients (male 13 and female 13) who did not opt for the corticotomy procedure were selected as the control. There was no blindness of the party distribution. It was focused on the patient's ability to opt for an additional minor surgical procedure that may affect orthodontic treatment length. The operation was conducted under local anesthesia (Lignox 2%). The same maxillofacial surgeon performed all the surgical operations. Results: The space present in the maxillary and mandibular arch at the time of retraction had no statistically significant difference in both the control and study groups (P > 0.05). In comparison, the mean amount of retraction space in the maxillary arch and maxillary arch was significant in the control and study groups at 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, and 4 months of the time interval. Conclusion: It can be concluded that corticotomy-assisted retraction significantly decreases the total length of orthodontic care. Effectively stationary anchorage segment was made, thereby removing the need for other anchorage boosters, instrumental in maximum anchorage cases using corticotomy technique.Shubham KumarSaurav KumarNadira HassanSabika MazharRavi AnjanBharti AnandWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsarticlecorticotomyorthodontic retractionorthodonticsPharmacy and materia medicaRS1-441Analytical chemistryQD71-142ENJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 6, Pp 1320-1323 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	corticotomy orthodontic retraction orthodontics Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142
spellingShingle	corticotomy orthodontic retraction orthodontics Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142 Shubham Kumar Saurav Kumar Nadira Hassan Sabika Mazhar Ravi Anjan Bharti Anand Comparison of the efficiency and treatment outcome of patients treated with corticotomy-assisted En masse orthodontic retraction with the en masse retraction without corticotomy
description	Background: Corticotomy in fixed orthodontic treatment gives a potential approach to reduce the treatment duration. Typically, this duration of rapid tooth movement lasts 4–6 months. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the treatment outcome and effectiveness in en masse retraction with and without corticotomy. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two patients (male 16 and female 16) who opted to undergo surgery to reduce the orthodontic treatment time were chosen for the research, and the group consisted of 26 patients (male 13 and female 13) who did not opt for the corticotomy procedure were selected as the control. There was no blindness of the party distribution. It was focused on the patient's ability to opt for an additional minor surgical procedure that may affect orthodontic treatment length. The operation was conducted under local anesthesia (Lignox 2%). The same maxillofacial surgeon performed all the surgical operations. Results: The space present in the maxillary and mandibular arch at the time of retraction had no statistically significant difference in both the control and study groups (P > 0.05). In comparison, the mean amount of retraction space in the maxillary arch and maxillary arch was significant in the control and study groups at 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, and 4 months of the time interval. Conclusion: It can be concluded that corticotomy-assisted retraction significantly decreases the total length of orthodontic care. Effectively stationary anchorage segment was made, thereby removing the need for other anchorage boosters, instrumental in maximum anchorage cases using corticotomy technique.
format	article
author	Shubham Kumar Saurav Kumar Nadira Hassan Sabika Mazhar Ravi Anjan Bharti Anand
author_facet	Shubham Kumar Saurav Kumar Nadira Hassan Sabika Mazhar Ravi Anjan Bharti Anand
author_sort	Shubham Kumar
title	Comparison of the efficiency and treatment outcome of patients treated with corticotomy-assisted En masse orthodontic retraction with the en masse retraction without corticotomy
title_short	Comparison of the efficiency and treatment outcome of patients treated with corticotomy-assisted En masse orthodontic retraction with the en masse retraction without corticotomy
title_full	Comparison of the efficiency and treatment outcome of patients treated with corticotomy-assisted En masse orthodontic retraction with the en masse retraction without corticotomy
title_fullStr	Comparison of the efficiency and treatment outcome of patients treated with corticotomy-assisted En masse orthodontic retraction with the en masse retraction without corticotomy
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison of the efficiency and treatment outcome of patients treated with corticotomy-assisted En masse orthodontic retraction with the en masse retraction without corticotomy
title_sort	comparison of the efficiency and treatment outcome of patients treated with corticotomy-assisted en masse orthodontic retraction with the en masse retraction without corticotomy
publisher	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/08b1485c7ee64e2e9f5d13232c09f3a5
work_keys_str_mv	AT shubhamkumar comparisonoftheefficiencyandtreatmentoutcomeofpatientstreatedwithcorticotomyassistedenmasseorthodonticretractionwiththeenmasseretractionwithoutcorticotomy AT sauravkumar comparisonoftheefficiencyandtreatmentoutcomeofpatientstreatedwithcorticotomyassistedenmasseorthodonticretractionwiththeenmasseretractionwithoutcorticotomy AT nadirahassan comparisonoftheefficiencyandtreatmentoutcomeofpatientstreatedwithcorticotomyassistedenmasseorthodonticretractionwiththeenmasseretractionwithoutcorticotomy AT sabikamazhar comparisonoftheefficiencyandtreatmentoutcomeofpatientstreatedwithcorticotomyassistedenmasseorthodonticretractionwiththeenmasseretractionwithoutcorticotomy AT ravianjan comparisonoftheefficiencyandtreatmentoutcomeofpatientstreatedwithcorticotomyassistedenmasseorthodonticretractionwiththeenmasseretractionwithoutcorticotomy AT bhartianand comparisonoftheefficiencyandtreatmentoutcomeofpatientstreatedwithcorticotomyassistedenmasseorthodonticretractionwiththeenmasseretractionwithoutcorticotomy
_version_	1718420111702884352

Comparison of the efficiency and treatment outcome of patients treated with corticotomy-assisted En masse orthodontic retraction with the en masse retraction without corticotomy

Ejemplares similares