Reproducibility of Pansharpening Methods and Quality Indexes versus Data Formats

In this work, we investigate whether the performance of pansharpening methods depends on their input data format; in the case of spectral radiance, either in its original floating-point format or in an integer-packed fixed-point format. It is theoretically proven and experimentally demonstrated that...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alberto Arienzo, Bruno Aiazzi, Luciano Alparone, Andrea Garzelli
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/08d1d037dfe941a3b8bf05034954e8dd
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:08d1d037dfe941a3b8bf05034954e8dd
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:08d1d037dfe941a3b8bf05034954e8dd2021-11-11T18:55:32ZReproducibility of Pansharpening Methods and Quality Indexes versus Data Formats10.3390/rs132143992072-4292https://doaj.org/article/08d1d037dfe941a3b8bf05034954e8dd2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/21/4399https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292In this work, we investigate whether the performance of pansharpening methods depends on their input data format; in the case of spectral radiance, either in its original floating-point format or in an integer-packed fixed-point format. It is theoretically proven and experimentally demonstrated that methods based on multiresolution analysis are unaffected by the data format. Conversely, the format is crucial for methods based on component substitution, unless the intensity component is calculated by means of a multivariate linear regression between the upsampled bands and the lowpass-filtered Pan. Another concern related to data formats is whether quality measurements, carried out by means of normalized indexes depend on the format of the data on which they are calculated. We will focus on some of the most widely used with-reference indexes to provide a novel insight into their behaviors. Both theoretical analyses and computer simulations, carried out on GeoEye-1 and WorldView-2 datasets with the products of nine pansharpening methods, show that their performance does not depend on the data format for purely radiometric indexes, while it significantly depends on the data format, either floating-point or fixed-point, for a purely spectral index, like the spectral angle mapper. The dependence on the data format is weak for indexes that balance the spectral and radiometric similarity, like the family of indexes, Q2<sup><i>n</i></sup>, based on hypercomplex algebra.Alberto ArienzoBruno AiazziLuciano AlparoneAndrea GarzelliMDPI AGarticledata formatsmultispectral imagespansharpeningremote sensingreproducibilitystatistical quality indexesScienceQENRemote Sensing, Vol 13, Iss 4399, p 4399 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic data formats
multispectral images
pansharpening
remote sensing
reproducibility
statistical quality indexes
Science
Q
spellingShingle data formats
multispectral images
pansharpening
remote sensing
reproducibility
statistical quality indexes
Science
Q
Alberto Arienzo
Bruno Aiazzi
Luciano Alparone
Andrea Garzelli
Reproducibility of Pansharpening Methods and Quality Indexes versus Data Formats
description In this work, we investigate whether the performance of pansharpening methods depends on their input data format; in the case of spectral radiance, either in its original floating-point format or in an integer-packed fixed-point format. It is theoretically proven and experimentally demonstrated that methods based on multiresolution analysis are unaffected by the data format. Conversely, the format is crucial for methods based on component substitution, unless the intensity component is calculated by means of a multivariate linear regression between the upsampled bands and the lowpass-filtered Pan. Another concern related to data formats is whether quality measurements, carried out by means of normalized indexes depend on the format of the data on which they are calculated. We will focus on some of the most widely used with-reference indexes to provide a novel insight into their behaviors. Both theoretical analyses and computer simulations, carried out on GeoEye-1 and WorldView-2 datasets with the products of nine pansharpening methods, show that their performance does not depend on the data format for purely radiometric indexes, while it significantly depends on the data format, either floating-point or fixed-point, for a purely spectral index, like the spectral angle mapper. The dependence on the data format is weak for indexes that balance the spectral and radiometric similarity, like the family of indexes, Q2<sup><i>n</i></sup>, based on hypercomplex algebra.
format article
author Alberto Arienzo
Bruno Aiazzi
Luciano Alparone
Andrea Garzelli
author_facet Alberto Arienzo
Bruno Aiazzi
Luciano Alparone
Andrea Garzelli
author_sort Alberto Arienzo
title Reproducibility of Pansharpening Methods and Quality Indexes versus Data Formats
title_short Reproducibility of Pansharpening Methods and Quality Indexes versus Data Formats
title_full Reproducibility of Pansharpening Methods and Quality Indexes versus Data Formats
title_fullStr Reproducibility of Pansharpening Methods and Quality Indexes versus Data Formats
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of Pansharpening Methods and Quality Indexes versus Data Formats
title_sort reproducibility of pansharpening methods and quality indexes versus data formats
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/08d1d037dfe941a3b8bf05034954e8dd
work_keys_str_mv AT albertoarienzo reproducibilityofpansharpeningmethodsandqualityindexesversusdataformats
AT brunoaiazzi reproducibilityofpansharpeningmethodsandqualityindexesversusdataformats
AT lucianoalparone reproducibilityofpansharpeningmethodsandqualityindexesversusdataformats
AT andreagarzelli reproducibilityofpansharpeningmethodsandqualityindexesversusdataformats
_version_ 1718431626373890048