Maturation of cognitive control: delineating response inhibition and interference suppression.

Cognitive control is integral to the ability to attend to a relevant task whilst suppressing distracting information or inhibiting prepotent responses. The current study examined the development of these two subprocesses by examining electrophysiological indices elicited during each process. Thirtee...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Christopher R Brydges, Mike Anderson, Corinne L Reid, Allison M Fox
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/08ec4daaad754209a7b5f3bafb04fc7a
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:08ec4daaad754209a7b5f3bafb04fc7a
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:08ec4daaad754209a7b5f3bafb04fc7a2021-11-18T09:03:32ZMaturation of cognitive control: delineating response inhibition and interference suppression.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0069826https://doaj.org/article/08ec4daaad754209a7b5f3bafb04fc7a2013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23894548/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Cognitive control is integral to the ability to attend to a relevant task whilst suppressing distracting information or inhibiting prepotent responses. The current study examined the development of these two subprocesses by examining electrophysiological indices elicited during each process. Thirteen 18 year-old adults and thirteen children aged 8-11 years (mean=9.77 years) completed a hybrid Go/Nogo flanker task while continuous EEG data were recorded. The N2 topography for both response inhibition and interference suppression changed with increasing age. The neural activation associated with response inhibition became increasingly frontally distributed with age, and showed decreases of both amplitude and peak latency from childhood to adulthood, possibly due to reduced cognitive demands and myelination respectively occurring during this period. Interestingly, a significant N2 effect was apparent in adults, but not observed in children during trials requiring interference suppression. This could be due to more diffuse activation in children, which would require smaller levels of activation over a larger region of the brain than is reported in adults. Overall, these results provide evidence of distinct maturational processes occurring throughout late childhood and adolescence, highlighting the separability of response inhibition and interference suppression.Christopher R BrydgesMike AndersonCorinne L ReidAllison M FoxPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 7, p e69826 (2013)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Christopher R Brydges Mike Anderson Corinne L Reid Allison M Fox Maturation of cognitive control: delineating response inhibition and interference suppression.
description	Cognitive control is integral to the ability to attend to a relevant task whilst suppressing distracting information or inhibiting prepotent responses. The current study examined the development of these two subprocesses by examining electrophysiological indices elicited during each process. Thirteen 18 year-old adults and thirteen children aged 8-11 years (mean=9.77 years) completed a hybrid Go/Nogo flanker task while continuous EEG data were recorded. The N2 topography for both response inhibition and interference suppression changed with increasing age. The neural activation associated with response inhibition became increasingly frontally distributed with age, and showed decreases of both amplitude and peak latency from childhood to adulthood, possibly due to reduced cognitive demands and myelination respectively occurring during this period. Interestingly, a significant N2 effect was apparent in adults, but not observed in children during trials requiring interference suppression. This could be due to more diffuse activation in children, which would require smaller levels of activation over a larger region of the brain than is reported in adults. Overall, these results provide evidence of distinct maturational processes occurring throughout late childhood and adolescence, highlighting the separability of response inhibition and interference suppression.
format	article
author	Christopher R Brydges Mike Anderson Corinne L Reid Allison M Fox
author_facet	Christopher R Brydges Mike Anderson Corinne L Reid Allison M Fox
author_sort	Christopher R Brydges
title	Maturation of cognitive control: delineating response inhibition and interference suppression.
title_short	Maturation of cognitive control: delineating response inhibition and interference suppression.
title_full	Maturation of cognitive control: delineating response inhibition and interference suppression.
title_fullStr	Maturation of cognitive control: delineating response inhibition and interference suppression.
title_full_unstemmed	Maturation of cognitive control: delineating response inhibition and interference suppression.
title_sort	maturation of cognitive control: delineating response inhibition and interference suppression.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2013
url	https://doaj.org/article/08ec4daaad754209a7b5f3bafb04fc7a
work_keys_str_mv	AT christopherrbrydges maturationofcognitivecontroldelineatingresponseinhibitionandinterferencesuppression AT mikeanderson maturationofcognitivecontroldelineatingresponseinhibitionandinterferencesuppression AT corinnelreid maturationofcognitivecontroldelineatingresponseinhibitionandinterferencesuppression AT allisonmfox maturationofcognitivecontroldelineatingresponseinhibitionandinterferencesuppression
_version_	1718420945076486144

Maturation of cognitive control: delineating response inhibition and interference suppression.

Ejemplares similares