The feasibility of pancreatic duct stenting using a novel 4-Fr plastic stent with a 0.025-in. guidewire
Abstract Pancreatic duct stenting is a well-established method for reducing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis. However, there is no consensus on the optimal type of plastic stent. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a new 4-Fr plastic sten...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/0923f30a4b1b46a78b599e616ddc0063 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:0923f30a4b1b46a78b599e616ddc0063 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:0923f30a4b1b46a78b599e616ddc00632021-12-02T16:14:17ZThe feasibility of pancreatic duct stenting using a novel 4-Fr plastic stent with a 0.025-in. guidewire10.1038/s41598-021-92811-x2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/0923f30a4b1b46a78b599e616ddc00632021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92811-xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Pancreatic duct stenting is a well-established method for reducing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis. However, there is no consensus on the optimal type of plastic stent. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a new 4-Fr plastic stent for pancreatic duct stenting. Forty-nine consecutive patients who placed the 4-Fr stent into the pancreatic duct (4Fr group) were compared with 187 consecutive patients who placed a conventional 5-Fr stent (control group). The primary outcome was technical success. Complications rate, including post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) were the secondary outcomes. Propensity score matching was introduced to reduce selection bias. The technical success rate was 100% in the 4Fr group and 97.9% in the control group (p = 0.315). Post-ERCP amylase level was significantly lower in the 4-Fr group than the control group before propensity score matching (p = 0.006), though without statistical significance after propensity score matching (p = 0.298). The rate of PEP in the 4Fr group (6.1%) was lower than the control group (15.5%), though without statistical significance before (p = 0.088) and after (p = 1.00) propensity score matching. Pancreatic duct stenting using a novel 4-Fr plastic stent would be at least similar or more feasible and safe compared to the conventional plastic stent.Kazumasa NagaiAtsushi SofuniTakayoshi TsuchiyaKentaro IshiiReina TanakaRyosuke TonozukaShuntaro MukaiKenjiro YamamotoYukitoshi MatsunamiYasutsugu AsaiTakashi KurosawaHiroyuki KojimaHirohito MinamiToshihiro HonmaAkio KatanumaTakao ItoiNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Kazumasa Nagai Atsushi Sofuni Takayoshi Tsuchiya Kentaro Ishii Reina Tanaka Ryosuke Tonozuka Shuntaro Mukai Kenjiro Yamamoto Yukitoshi Matsunami Yasutsugu Asai Takashi Kurosawa Hiroyuki Kojima Hirohito Minami Toshihiro Honma Akio Katanuma Takao Itoi The feasibility of pancreatic duct stenting using a novel 4-Fr plastic stent with a 0.025-in. guidewire |
description |
Abstract Pancreatic duct stenting is a well-established method for reducing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis. However, there is no consensus on the optimal type of plastic stent. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a new 4-Fr plastic stent for pancreatic duct stenting. Forty-nine consecutive patients who placed the 4-Fr stent into the pancreatic duct (4Fr group) were compared with 187 consecutive patients who placed a conventional 5-Fr stent (control group). The primary outcome was technical success. Complications rate, including post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) were the secondary outcomes. Propensity score matching was introduced to reduce selection bias. The technical success rate was 100% in the 4Fr group and 97.9% in the control group (p = 0.315). Post-ERCP amylase level was significantly lower in the 4-Fr group than the control group before propensity score matching (p = 0.006), though without statistical significance after propensity score matching (p = 0.298). The rate of PEP in the 4Fr group (6.1%) was lower than the control group (15.5%), though without statistical significance before (p = 0.088) and after (p = 1.00) propensity score matching. Pancreatic duct stenting using a novel 4-Fr plastic stent would be at least similar or more feasible and safe compared to the conventional plastic stent. |
format |
article |
author |
Kazumasa Nagai Atsushi Sofuni Takayoshi Tsuchiya Kentaro Ishii Reina Tanaka Ryosuke Tonozuka Shuntaro Mukai Kenjiro Yamamoto Yukitoshi Matsunami Yasutsugu Asai Takashi Kurosawa Hiroyuki Kojima Hirohito Minami Toshihiro Honma Akio Katanuma Takao Itoi |
author_facet |
Kazumasa Nagai Atsushi Sofuni Takayoshi Tsuchiya Kentaro Ishii Reina Tanaka Ryosuke Tonozuka Shuntaro Mukai Kenjiro Yamamoto Yukitoshi Matsunami Yasutsugu Asai Takashi Kurosawa Hiroyuki Kojima Hirohito Minami Toshihiro Honma Akio Katanuma Takao Itoi |
author_sort |
Kazumasa Nagai |
title |
The feasibility of pancreatic duct stenting using a novel 4-Fr plastic stent with a 0.025-in. guidewire |
title_short |
The feasibility of pancreatic duct stenting using a novel 4-Fr plastic stent with a 0.025-in. guidewire |
title_full |
The feasibility of pancreatic duct stenting using a novel 4-Fr plastic stent with a 0.025-in. guidewire |
title_fullStr |
The feasibility of pancreatic duct stenting using a novel 4-Fr plastic stent with a 0.025-in. guidewire |
title_full_unstemmed |
The feasibility of pancreatic duct stenting using a novel 4-Fr plastic stent with a 0.025-in. guidewire |
title_sort |
feasibility of pancreatic duct stenting using a novel 4-fr plastic stent with a 0.025-in. guidewire |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/0923f30a4b1b46a78b599e616ddc0063 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kazumasanagai thefeasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT atsushisofuni thefeasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT takayoshitsuchiya thefeasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT kentaroishii thefeasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT reinatanaka thefeasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT ryosuketonozuka thefeasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT shuntaromukai thefeasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT kenjiroyamamoto thefeasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT yukitoshimatsunami thefeasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT yasutsuguasai thefeasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT takashikurosawa thefeasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT hiroyukikojima thefeasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT hirohitominami thefeasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT toshihirohonma thefeasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT akiokatanuma thefeasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT takaoitoi thefeasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT kazumasanagai feasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT atsushisofuni feasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT takayoshitsuchiya feasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT kentaroishii feasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT reinatanaka feasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT ryosuketonozuka feasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT shuntaromukai feasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT kenjiroyamamoto feasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT yukitoshimatsunami feasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT yasutsuguasai feasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT takashikurosawa feasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT hiroyukikojima feasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT hirohitominami feasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT toshihirohonma feasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT akiokatanuma feasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire AT takaoitoi feasibilityofpancreaticductstentingusinganovel4frplasticstentwitha0025inguidewire |
_version_ |
1718384333084950528 |