Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note and an Outcome Comparison with the Conventional Minimally Invasive Fusion

Asrafi Rizki Gatam,1 Luthfi Gatam,1 Harmantya Mahadhipta,2 Ajiantoro Ajiantoro,3 Omar Luthfi,4 Dina Aprilya5 1Orthopaedic Spine Division, Fatmawati General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia; 2Orthopaedic Spine Division, Tangerang General Hospital, Banten, Indonesia; 3Orthopaedic Spine Division, Premier B...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gatam AR, Gatam L, Mahadhipta H, Ajiantoro A, Luthfi O, Aprilya D
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/09a8072e9c6e4a97ba463511e6f1b748
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:09a8072e9c6e4a97ba463511e6f1b748
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:09a8072e9c6e4a97ba463511e6f1b7482021-11-23T18:43:02ZUnilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note and an Outcome Comparison with the Conventional Minimally Invasive Fusion1179-1462https://doaj.org/article/09a8072e9c6e4a97ba463511e6f1b7482021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/unilateral-biportal-endoscopic-lumbar-interbody-fusion-a-technical-not-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-ORRhttps://doaj.org/toc/1179-1462Asrafi Rizki Gatam,1 Luthfi Gatam,1 Harmantya Mahadhipta,2 Ajiantoro Ajiantoro,3 Omar Luthfi,4 Dina Aprilya5 1Orthopaedic Spine Division, Fatmawati General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia; 2Orthopaedic Spine Division, Tangerang General Hospital, Banten, Indonesia; 3Orthopaedic Spine Division, Premier Bintaro Hospital, Banten, Indonesia; 4Orthopedic Spine Division, Adhyaksa General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia; 5Orthopedic and Traumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaCorrespondence: Dina AprilyaOrthopedic and Traumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaEmail dina.cia.aprilya@gmail.comBackground: In the past few decades, the minimally invasive technique for spine surgery has developed extensively from the scope of decompression until fusion surgeries to reduce damages to the normal anatomical structure. Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) is one of the fusion options which is readily available without a sophisticated minimal invasive instrument. Our aim is to introduce ULIF experience in our center and comparing the result with conventional minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF).Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 145 lumbar spondylolisthesis cases that underwent fusion surgery with either ULIF or the conventional MIS-TLIF. All of the patients were observed within a 12-month follow-up period to evaluate the back pain and leg pain Visual Analogue Score (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and fusion rate.Results: The leg pain VAS was similarly improved in both groups. ULIF has a significant back pain improvement on direct post operation and at the 3-months follow-up (p value 0.032 and 0.046 respectively). ULIF group also had a significantly better improvement of ODI scores on the early post-operative period (p=0.045). However, both groups similarly showed improvement of ODI score and the SF-36 at the 3-, 6-, and 12- months follow up.Conclusion: Full endoscopic fusion surgery with ULIF offers a comparable long-term outcome and a significantly better back pain VAS reduction in short-term follow up compared to the conventional MIS-TLIF. ULIF, with further improvement, can be the next gold standard in managing degenerative lumbar spine conditions.Keywords: lumbar spine, degenerative spondylolisthesis, minimally invasive spine surgery, lumbar interbody fusion, unilateral biportal endoscopy, full endoscopic spine surgery, MISSGatam ARGatam LMahadhipta HAjiantoro ALuthfi OAprilya DDove Medical Pressarticlelumbar spinedegenerative spondylolisthesisminimally invasive spine surgerylumbar interbody fusionunilateral biportal endoscopyfull endoscopic spine surgeryOrthopedic surgeryRD701-811Diseases of the musculoskeletal systemRC925-935ENOrthopedic Research and Reviews, Vol Volume 13, Pp 229-239 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic lumbar spine
degenerative spondylolisthesis
minimally invasive spine surgery
lumbar interbody fusion
unilateral biportal endoscopy
full endoscopic spine surgery
Orthopedic surgery
RD701-811
Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
RC925-935
spellingShingle lumbar spine
degenerative spondylolisthesis
minimally invasive spine surgery
lumbar interbody fusion
unilateral biportal endoscopy
full endoscopic spine surgery
Orthopedic surgery
RD701-811
Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
RC925-935
Gatam AR
Gatam L
Mahadhipta H
Ajiantoro A
Luthfi O
Aprilya D
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note and an Outcome Comparison with the Conventional Minimally Invasive Fusion
description Asrafi Rizki Gatam,1 Luthfi Gatam,1 Harmantya Mahadhipta,2 Ajiantoro Ajiantoro,3 Omar Luthfi,4 Dina Aprilya5 1Orthopaedic Spine Division, Fatmawati General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia; 2Orthopaedic Spine Division, Tangerang General Hospital, Banten, Indonesia; 3Orthopaedic Spine Division, Premier Bintaro Hospital, Banten, Indonesia; 4Orthopedic Spine Division, Adhyaksa General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia; 5Orthopedic and Traumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaCorrespondence: Dina AprilyaOrthopedic and Traumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaEmail dina.cia.aprilya@gmail.comBackground: In the past few decades, the minimally invasive technique for spine surgery has developed extensively from the scope of decompression until fusion surgeries to reduce damages to the normal anatomical structure. Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) is one of the fusion options which is readily available without a sophisticated minimal invasive instrument. Our aim is to introduce ULIF experience in our center and comparing the result with conventional minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF).Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 145 lumbar spondylolisthesis cases that underwent fusion surgery with either ULIF or the conventional MIS-TLIF. All of the patients were observed within a 12-month follow-up period to evaluate the back pain and leg pain Visual Analogue Score (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and fusion rate.Results: The leg pain VAS was similarly improved in both groups. ULIF has a significant back pain improvement on direct post operation and at the 3-months follow-up (p value 0.032 and 0.046 respectively). ULIF group also had a significantly better improvement of ODI scores on the early post-operative period (p=0.045). However, both groups similarly showed improvement of ODI score and the SF-36 at the 3-, 6-, and 12- months follow up.Conclusion: Full endoscopic fusion surgery with ULIF offers a comparable long-term outcome and a significantly better back pain VAS reduction in short-term follow up compared to the conventional MIS-TLIF. ULIF, with further improvement, can be the next gold standard in managing degenerative lumbar spine conditions.Keywords: lumbar spine, degenerative spondylolisthesis, minimally invasive spine surgery, lumbar interbody fusion, unilateral biportal endoscopy, full endoscopic spine surgery, MISS
format article
author Gatam AR
Gatam L
Mahadhipta H
Ajiantoro A
Luthfi O
Aprilya D
author_facet Gatam AR
Gatam L
Mahadhipta H
Ajiantoro A
Luthfi O
Aprilya D
author_sort Gatam AR
title Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note and an Outcome Comparison with the Conventional Minimally Invasive Fusion
title_short Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note and an Outcome Comparison with the Conventional Minimally Invasive Fusion
title_full Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note and an Outcome Comparison with the Conventional Minimally Invasive Fusion
title_fullStr Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note and an Outcome Comparison with the Conventional Minimally Invasive Fusion
title_full_unstemmed Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note and an Outcome Comparison with the Conventional Minimally Invasive Fusion
title_sort unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion: a technical note and an outcome comparison with the conventional minimally invasive fusion
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/09a8072e9c6e4a97ba463511e6f1b748
work_keys_str_mv AT gatamar unilateralbiportalendoscopiclumbarinterbodyfusionatechnicalnoteandanoutcomecomparisonwiththeconventionalminimallyinvasivefusion
AT gataml unilateralbiportalendoscopiclumbarinterbodyfusionatechnicalnoteandanoutcomecomparisonwiththeconventionalminimallyinvasivefusion
AT mahadhiptah unilateralbiportalendoscopiclumbarinterbodyfusionatechnicalnoteandanoutcomecomparisonwiththeconventionalminimallyinvasivefusion
AT ajiantoroa unilateralbiportalendoscopiclumbarinterbodyfusionatechnicalnoteandanoutcomecomparisonwiththeconventionalminimallyinvasivefusion
AT luthfio unilateralbiportalendoscopiclumbarinterbodyfusionatechnicalnoteandanoutcomecomparisonwiththeconventionalminimallyinvasivefusion
AT aprilyad unilateralbiportalendoscopiclumbarinterbodyfusionatechnicalnoteandanoutcomecomparisonwiththeconventionalminimallyinvasivefusion
_version_ 1718416134688997376