The effect of different soft-tissue management techniques for alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled clinical trial
Abstract Purpose For alveolar ridge preservation, various treatment protocols have been described. While most studies focus on the effect of the bone graft material, the aim of this study was to analyze the influence of different soft-tissue management techniques on the soft and hard tissue. Methods...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
SpringerOpen
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/0a123966e22d450bb6e7b79f93ec50ca |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:0a123966e22d450bb6e7b79f93ec50ca |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:0a123966e22d450bb6e7b79f93ec50ca2021-11-21T12:27:27ZThe effect of different soft-tissue management techniques for alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled clinical trial10.1186/s40729-021-00390-32198-4034https://doaj.org/article/0a123966e22d450bb6e7b79f93ec50ca2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00390-3https://doaj.org/toc/2198-4034Abstract Purpose For alveolar ridge preservation, various treatment protocols have been described. While most studies focus on the effect of the bone graft material, the aim of this study was to analyze the influence of different soft-tissue management techniques on the soft and hard tissue. Methods A total of 20 maxillary extraction sockets were grafted with an anorganic xenogenic bone graft and then randomly treated with either a combined epithelialized-subepithelial connective tissue graft (CECG) or a porcine collagen matrix (CM) placed in labial and palatal tunnels. Measurements of soft-tissue thickness were performed at tooth extraction (T0), implant insertion (T1) and second stage surgery (T2). Results In the CECG group, gingival thickness was 1.18 ± 0.56 mm (T0), 1.29 ± 0.26 mm (T1) and 1.2 ± 0.32 mm (T3). In the CM group, the measurements were 1.24 ± 0.50 mm (T0), 1.6 ± 0.6 mm (T1) and 1.7 ± 1.06 mm. Thus, there was an overall increase in gingival thickness from T0 to T2 of 0.02 ± 0.66 mm (CECG) compared to 0.46 ± 0.89 mm (CM). The thickness of keratinized soft-tissue was 3.91 ± 1.11 mm (CECG) and 4.76 ± 1.48 mm (CM) before extraction and 3.93 ± 1.17 mm (CECG) and 4.22 mm ± 1.26 mm (CM) at implant follow-up. Mean peri-implant probing depths were 3.15 ± 1.39 mm (CECG) and 3.41 ± 0.99 mm (CM). Conclusions After ridge preservation, comparable soft-tissue parameters were observed in both groups, whether treated with a collagen matrix or a combined autologous connective tissue graft.Colline PapaceChristopher BüschOliver RistowMartin KewelohJürgen HoffmannChristian MertensSpringerOpenarticleAlveolar ridge preservationSoft-tissue managementTooth extractionSurgical procedureRandomised controlled clinical trialMedicineRDentistryRK1-715ENInternational Journal of Implant Dentistry, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Alveolar ridge preservation Soft-tissue management Tooth extraction Surgical procedure Randomised controlled clinical trial Medicine R Dentistry RK1-715 |
spellingShingle |
Alveolar ridge preservation Soft-tissue management Tooth extraction Surgical procedure Randomised controlled clinical trial Medicine R Dentistry RK1-715 Colline Papace Christopher Büsch Oliver Ristow Martin Keweloh Jürgen Hoffmann Christian Mertens The effect of different soft-tissue management techniques for alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled clinical trial |
description |
Abstract Purpose For alveolar ridge preservation, various treatment protocols have been described. While most studies focus on the effect of the bone graft material, the aim of this study was to analyze the influence of different soft-tissue management techniques on the soft and hard tissue. Methods A total of 20 maxillary extraction sockets were grafted with an anorganic xenogenic bone graft and then randomly treated with either a combined epithelialized-subepithelial connective tissue graft (CECG) or a porcine collagen matrix (CM) placed in labial and palatal tunnels. Measurements of soft-tissue thickness were performed at tooth extraction (T0), implant insertion (T1) and second stage surgery (T2). Results In the CECG group, gingival thickness was 1.18 ± 0.56 mm (T0), 1.29 ± 0.26 mm (T1) and 1.2 ± 0.32 mm (T3). In the CM group, the measurements were 1.24 ± 0.50 mm (T0), 1.6 ± 0.6 mm (T1) and 1.7 ± 1.06 mm. Thus, there was an overall increase in gingival thickness from T0 to T2 of 0.02 ± 0.66 mm (CECG) compared to 0.46 ± 0.89 mm (CM). The thickness of keratinized soft-tissue was 3.91 ± 1.11 mm (CECG) and 4.76 ± 1.48 mm (CM) before extraction and 3.93 ± 1.17 mm (CECG) and 4.22 mm ± 1.26 mm (CM) at implant follow-up. Mean peri-implant probing depths were 3.15 ± 1.39 mm (CECG) and 3.41 ± 0.99 mm (CM). Conclusions After ridge preservation, comparable soft-tissue parameters were observed in both groups, whether treated with a collagen matrix or a combined autologous connective tissue graft. |
format |
article |
author |
Colline Papace Christopher Büsch Oliver Ristow Martin Keweloh Jürgen Hoffmann Christian Mertens |
author_facet |
Colline Papace Christopher Büsch Oliver Ristow Martin Keweloh Jürgen Hoffmann Christian Mertens |
author_sort |
Colline Papace |
title |
The effect of different soft-tissue management techniques for alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled clinical trial |
title_short |
The effect of different soft-tissue management techniques for alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled clinical trial |
title_full |
The effect of different soft-tissue management techniques for alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled clinical trial |
title_fullStr |
The effect of different soft-tissue management techniques for alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
The effect of different soft-tissue management techniques for alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled clinical trial |
title_sort |
effect of different soft-tissue management techniques for alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled clinical trial |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/0a123966e22d450bb6e7b79f93ec50ca |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT collinepapace theeffectofdifferentsofttissuemanagementtechniquesforalveolarridgepreservationarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT christopherbusch theeffectofdifferentsofttissuemanagementtechniquesforalveolarridgepreservationarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT oliverristow theeffectofdifferentsofttissuemanagementtechniquesforalveolarridgepreservationarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT martinkeweloh theeffectofdifferentsofttissuemanagementtechniquesforalveolarridgepreservationarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT jurgenhoffmann theeffectofdifferentsofttissuemanagementtechniquesforalveolarridgepreservationarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT christianmertens theeffectofdifferentsofttissuemanagementtechniquesforalveolarridgepreservationarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT collinepapace effectofdifferentsofttissuemanagementtechniquesforalveolarridgepreservationarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT christopherbusch effectofdifferentsofttissuemanagementtechniquesforalveolarridgepreservationarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT oliverristow effectofdifferentsofttissuemanagementtechniquesforalveolarridgepreservationarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT martinkeweloh effectofdifferentsofttissuemanagementtechniquesforalveolarridgepreservationarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT jurgenhoffmann effectofdifferentsofttissuemanagementtechniquesforalveolarridgepreservationarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT christianmertens effectofdifferentsofttissuemanagementtechniquesforalveolarridgepreservationarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial |
_version_ |
1718418984893677568 |