The effect of different soft-tissue management techniques for alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Abstract Purpose For alveolar ridge preservation, various treatment protocols have been described. While most studies focus on the effect of the bone graft material, the aim of this study was to analyze the influence of different soft-tissue management techniques on the soft and hard tissue. Methods...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colline Papace, Christopher Büsch, Oliver Ristow, Martin Keweloh, Jürgen Hoffmann, Christian Mertens
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: SpringerOpen 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0a123966e22d450bb6e7b79f93ec50ca
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0a123966e22d450bb6e7b79f93ec50ca
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0a123966e22d450bb6e7b79f93ec50ca2021-11-21T12:27:27ZThe effect of different soft-tissue management techniques for alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled clinical trial10.1186/s40729-021-00390-32198-4034https://doaj.org/article/0a123966e22d450bb6e7b79f93ec50ca2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00390-3https://doaj.org/toc/2198-4034Abstract Purpose For alveolar ridge preservation, various treatment protocols have been described. While most studies focus on the effect of the bone graft material, the aim of this study was to analyze the influence of different soft-tissue management techniques on the soft and hard tissue. Methods A total of 20 maxillary extraction sockets were grafted with an anorganic xenogenic bone graft and then randomly treated with either a combined epithelialized-subepithelial connective tissue graft (CECG) or a porcine collagen matrix (CM) placed in labial and palatal tunnels. Measurements of soft-tissue thickness were performed at tooth extraction (T0), implant insertion (T1) and second stage surgery (T2). Results In the CECG group, gingival thickness was 1.18 ± 0.56 mm (T0), 1.29 ± 0.26 mm (T1) and 1.2 ± 0.32 mm (T3). In the CM group, the measurements were 1.24 ± 0.50 mm (T0), 1.6 ± 0.6 mm (T1) and 1.7 ± 1.06 mm. Thus, there was an overall increase in gingival thickness from T0 to T2 of 0.02 ± 0.66 mm (CECG) compared to 0.46 ± 0.89 mm (CM). The thickness of keratinized soft-tissue was 3.91 ± 1.11 mm (CECG) and 4.76 ± 1.48 mm (CM) before extraction and 3.93 ± 1.17 mm (CECG) and 4.22 mm ± 1.26 mm (CM) at implant follow-up. Mean peri-implant probing depths were 3.15 ± 1.39 mm (CECG) and 3.41 ± 0.99 mm (CM). Conclusions After ridge preservation, comparable soft-tissue parameters were observed in both groups, whether treated with a collagen matrix or a combined autologous connective tissue graft.Colline PapaceChristopher BüschOliver RistowMartin KewelohJürgen HoffmannChristian MertensSpringerOpenarticleAlveolar ridge preservationSoft-tissue managementTooth extractionSurgical procedureRandomised controlled clinical trialMedicineRDentistryRK1-715ENInternational Journal of Implant Dentistry, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Alveolar ridge preservation
Soft-tissue management
Tooth extraction
Surgical procedure
Randomised controlled clinical trial
Medicine
R
Dentistry
RK1-715
spellingShingle Alveolar ridge preservation
Soft-tissue management
Tooth extraction
Surgical procedure
Randomised controlled clinical trial
Medicine
R
Dentistry
RK1-715
Colline Papace
Christopher Büsch
Oliver Ristow
Martin Keweloh
Jürgen Hoffmann
Christian Mertens
The effect of different soft-tissue management techniques for alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled clinical trial
description Abstract Purpose For alveolar ridge preservation, various treatment protocols have been described. While most studies focus on the effect of the bone graft material, the aim of this study was to analyze the influence of different soft-tissue management techniques on the soft and hard tissue. Methods A total of 20 maxillary extraction sockets were grafted with an anorganic xenogenic bone graft and then randomly treated with either a combined epithelialized-subepithelial connective tissue graft (CECG) or a porcine collagen matrix (CM) placed in labial and palatal tunnels. Measurements of soft-tissue thickness were performed at tooth extraction (T0), implant insertion (T1) and second stage surgery (T2). Results In the CECG group, gingival thickness was 1.18 ± 0.56 mm (T0), 1.29 ± 0.26 mm (T1) and 1.2 ± 0.32 mm (T3). In the CM group, the measurements were 1.24 ± 0.50 mm (T0), 1.6 ± 0.6 mm (T1) and 1.7 ± 1.06 mm. Thus, there was an overall increase in gingival thickness from T0 to T2 of 0.02 ± 0.66 mm (CECG) compared to 0.46 ± 0.89 mm (CM). The thickness of keratinized soft-tissue was 3.91 ± 1.11 mm (CECG) and 4.76 ± 1.48 mm (CM) before extraction and 3.93 ± 1.17 mm (CECG) and 4.22 mm ± 1.26 mm (CM) at implant follow-up. Mean peri-implant probing depths were 3.15 ± 1.39 mm (CECG) and 3.41 ± 0.99 mm (CM). Conclusions After ridge preservation, comparable soft-tissue parameters were observed in both groups, whether treated with a collagen matrix or a combined autologous connective tissue graft.
format article
author Colline Papace
Christopher Büsch
Oliver Ristow
Martin Keweloh
Jürgen Hoffmann
Christian Mertens
author_facet Colline Papace
Christopher Büsch
Oliver Ristow
Martin Keweloh
Jürgen Hoffmann
Christian Mertens
author_sort Colline Papace
title The effect of different soft-tissue management techniques for alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_short The effect of different soft-tissue management techniques for alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full The effect of different soft-tissue management techniques for alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr The effect of different soft-tissue management techniques for alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed The effect of different soft-tissue management techniques for alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_sort effect of different soft-tissue management techniques for alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled clinical trial
publisher SpringerOpen
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/0a123966e22d450bb6e7b79f93ec50ca
work_keys_str_mv AT collinepapace theeffectofdifferentsofttissuemanagementtechniquesforalveolarridgepreservationarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT christopherbusch theeffectofdifferentsofttissuemanagementtechniquesforalveolarridgepreservationarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT oliverristow theeffectofdifferentsofttissuemanagementtechniquesforalveolarridgepreservationarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT martinkeweloh theeffectofdifferentsofttissuemanagementtechniquesforalveolarridgepreservationarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT jurgenhoffmann theeffectofdifferentsofttissuemanagementtechniquesforalveolarridgepreservationarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT christianmertens theeffectofdifferentsofttissuemanagementtechniquesforalveolarridgepreservationarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT collinepapace effectofdifferentsofttissuemanagementtechniquesforalveolarridgepreservationarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT christopherbusch effectofdifferentsofttissuemanagementtechniquesforalveolarridgepreservationarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT oliverristow effectofdifferentsofttissuemanagementtechniquesforalveolarridgepreservationarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT martinkeweloh effectofdifferentsofttissuemanagementtechniquesforalveolarridgepreservationarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT jurgenhoffmann effectofdifferentsofttissuemanagementtechniquesforalveolarridgepreservationarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT christianmertens effectofdifferentsofttissuemanagementtechniquesforalveolarridgepreservationarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
_version_ 1718418984893677568