Efficacy and feasibility of the immunomagnetic separation based diagnosis for detecting sentinel lymph node metastasis from breast cancer

Xiang-Cheng Zhi,1–3,* Min Zhang,1–3,* Ting-Ting Meng,1–3,* Xiao-Bei Zhang,1–3 Zhen-Dong Shi,1–3 Yan Liu,1–3 Jing-Jing Liu,1–3 Sheng Zhang,1–3 Jin Zhang1–3 1Third Department of Breast Cancer, People’...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhi XC, Zhang M, Meng TT, Zhang XB, Shi ZD, Liu Y, Liu JJ, Zhang S, Zhang J
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0a2508e52a2242dcb2511a633710fac9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0a2508e52a2242dcb2511a633710fac9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0a2508e52a2242dcb2511a633710fac92021-12-02T01:01:57ZEfficacy and feasibility of the immunomagnetic separation based diagnosis for detecting sentinel lymph node metastasis from breast cancer1178-2013https://doaj.org/article/0a2508e52a2242dcb2511a633710fac92015-04-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/efficacy-and-feasibility-of-the-immunomagnetic-separation-based-diagno-peer-reviewed-article-IJNhttps://doaj.org/toc/1178-2013 Xiang-Cheng Zhi,1–3,* Min Zhang,1–3,* Ting-Ting Meng,1–3,* Xiao-Bei Zhang,1–3 Zhen-Dong Shi,1–3 Yan Liu,1–3 Jing-Jing Liu,1–3 Sheng Zhang,1–3 Jin Zhang1–3 1Third Department of Breast Cancer, People’s Republic of China Tianjin Breast Cancer Prevention, Treatment and Research Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China; 2Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy of the Ministry of Education, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China; 3Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China *These authors contributed equally to this work Abstract: A purpose of this study was to establish a novel molecular diagnostic model and provide new insight into the intraoperative evaluation of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in breast cancer. A total of 124 breast cancer patients who met the criteria of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and underwent intraoperative biopsy were consecutively enrolled in this study. After the SLNs obtained from each patient were labeled, MOC-31 monoclonal antibody-mediated immunomagnetic separation (IMS) and flow cytometry were used to determine the expressions of breast cancer metastasis-related markers, including Mucin 1 (MUC1), CD44v6, and HER2. Alternatively, conventional intraoperative hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining and cytokeratin immunohistochemistry (CK-IHC) were performed to detect potential SLN metastasis. The sensitivity, specificity, and false-negative rate of the three intraoperative diagnostic methods were compared and analyzed. A total of 55 positive-SLNs were found in 38 breast cancer patients using IMS, yielding a sensitivity of 86.4% (38/44), specificity of 94.7% (36/38), accuracy of 93.5% (116/124), false-positive rate of 2.5% (2/80), false-negative rate of 13.6% (6/44), positive predictive value of 95.5% (42/44), and negative predictive value of 93.0% (80/86). Patients with high expressions of CD44v6, MUC1, and HER2 in SLNs tended to have higher number of positive lymph nodes, among which the MUC1 and HER2 showed significant differences (P<0.05). Therefore, compared with conventional HE staining and CK-IHC, IMS technology has remarkably higher sensitivity and specificity and relative lower false-negative rate, thus making it an effective and feasible intraoperative detection method of SLN for breast cancer diagnosis to some extent. Keywords: immunomagnetic separation, breast cancer, sentinel lymph node, MUC1, CD44v6, HER2Zhi XCZhang MMeng TTZhang XBShi ZDLiu YLiu JJZhang SZhang JDove Medical PressarticleMedicine (General)R5-920ENInternational Journal of Nanomedicine, Vol 2015, Iss default, Pp 2775-2784 (2015)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle Medicine (General)
R5-920
Zhi XC
Zhang M
Meng TT
Zhang XB
Shi ZD
Liu Y
Liu JJ
Zhang S
Zhang J
Efficacy and feasibility of the immunomagnetic separation based diagnosis for detecting sentinel lymph node metastasis from breast cancer
description Xiang-Cheng Zhi,1–3,* Min Zhang,1–3,* Ting-Ting Meng,1–3,* Xiao-Bei Zhang,1–3 Zhen-Dong Shi,1–3 Yan Liu,1–3 Jing-Jing Liu,1–3 Sheng Zhang,1–3 Jin Zhang1–3 1Third Department of Breast Cancer, People’s Republic of China Tianjin Breast Cancer Prevention, Treatment and Research Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China; 2Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy of the Ministry of Education, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China; 3Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China *These authors contributed equally to this work Abstract: A purpose of this study was to establish a novel molecular diagnostic model and provide new insight into the intraoperative evaluation of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in breast cancer. A total of 124 breast cancer patients who met the criteria of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and underwent intraoperative biopsy were consecutively enrolled in this study. After the SLNs obtained from each patient were labeled, MOC-31 monoclonal antibody-mediated immunomagnetic separation (IMS) and flow cytometry were used to determine the expressions of breast cancer metastasis-related markers, including Mucin 1 (MUC1), CD44v6, and HER2. Alternatively, conventional intraoperative hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining and cytokeratin immunohistochemistry (CK-IHC) were performed to detect potential SLN metastasis. The sensitivity, specificity, and false-negative rate of the three intraoperative diagnostic methods were compared and analyzed. A total of 55 positive-SLNs were found in 38 breast cancer patients using IMS, yielding a sensitivity of 86.4% (38/44), specificity of 94.7% (36/38), accuracy of 93.5% (116/124), false-positive rate of 2.5% (2/80), false-negative rate of 13.6% (6/44), positive predictive value of 95.5% (42/44), and negative predictive value of 93.0% (80/86). Patients with high expressions of CD44v6, MUC1, and HER2 in SLNs tended to have higher number of positive lymph nodes, among which the MUC1 and HER2 showed significant differences (P<0.05). Therefore, compared with conventional HE staining and CK-IHC, IMS technology has remarkably higher sensitivity and specificity and relative lower false-negative rate, thus making it an effective and feasible intraoperative detection method of SLN for breast cancer diagnosis to some extent. Keywords: immunomagnetic separation, breast cancer, sentinel lymph node, MUC1, CD44v6, HER2
format article
author Zhi XC
Zhang M
Meng TT
Zhang XB
Shi ZD
Liu Y
Liu JJ
Zhang S
Zhang J
author_facet Zhi XC
Zhang M
Meng TT
Zhang XB
Shi ZD
Liu Y
Liu JJ
Zhang S
Zhang J
author_sort Zhi XC
title Efficacy and feasibility of the immunomagnetic separation based diagnosis for detecting sentinel lymph node metastasis from breast cancer
title_short Efficacy and feasibility of the immunomagnetic separation based diagnosis for detecting sentinel lymph node metastasis from breast cancer
title_full Efficacy and feasibility of the immunomagnetic separation based diagnosis for detecting sentinel lymph node metastasis from breast cancer
title_fullStr Efficacy and feasibility of the immunomagnetic separation based diagnosis for detecting sentinel lymph node metastasis from breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and feasibility of the immunomagnetic separation based diagnosis for detecting sentinel lymph node metastasis from breast cancer
title_sort efficacy and feasibility of the immunomagnetic separation based diagnosis for detecting sentinel lymph node metastasis from breast cancer
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2015
url https://doaj.org/article/0a2508e52a2242dcb2511a633710fac9
work_keys_str_mv AT zhixc efficacyandfeasibilityoftheimmunomagneticseparationbaseddiagnosisfordetectingsentinellymphnodemetastasisfrombreastcancer
AT zhangm efficacyandfeasibilityoftheimmunomagneticseparationbaseddiagnosisfordetectingsentinellymphnodemetastasisfrombreastcancer
AT mengtt efficacyandfeasibilityoftheimmunomagneticseparationbaseddiagnosisfordetectingsentinellymphnodemetastasisfrombreastcancer
AT zhangxb efficacyandfeasibilityoftheimmunomagneticseparationbaseddiagnosisfordetectingsentinellymphnodemetastasisfrombreastcancer
AT shizd efficacyandfeasibilityoftheimmunomagneticseparationbaseddiagnosisfordetectingsentinellymphnodemetastasisfrombreastcancer
AT liuy efficacyandfeasibilityoftheimmunomagneticseparationbaseddiagnosisfordetectingsentinellymphnodemetastasisfrombreastcancer
AT liujj efficacyandfeasibilityoftheimmunomagneticseparationbaseddiagnosisfordetectingsentinellymphnodemetastasisfrombreastcancer
AT zhangs efficacyandfeasibilityoftheimmunomagneticseparationbaseddiagnosisfordetectingsentinellymphnodemetastasisfrombreastcancer
AT zhangj efficacyandfeasibilityoftheimmunomagneticseparationbaseddiagnosisfordetectingsentinellymphnodemetastasisfrombreastcancer
_version_ 1718403297890533376