Disturbance Mapping in Arctic Tundra Improved by a Planning Workflow for Drone Studies: Advancing Tools for Future Ecosystem Monitoring

The Arctic is under great pressure due to climate change. Drones are increasingly used as a tool in ecology and may be especially valuable in rapidly changing and remote landscapes, as can be found in the Arctic. For effective applications of drones, decisions of both ecological and technical charac...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Isabell Eischeid, Eeva M. Soininen, Jakob J. Assmann, Rolf A. Ims, Jesper Madsen, Åshild Ø. Pedersen, Francesco Pirotti, Nigel G. Yoccoz, Virve T. Ravolainen
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0a4bff786604402896281db7f08f5ca9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0a4bff786604402896281db7f08f5ca9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0a4bff786604402896281db7f08f5ca92021-11-11T18:58:15ZDisturbance Mapping in Arctic Tundra Improved by a Planning Workflow for Drone Studies: Advancing Tools for Future Ecosystem Monitoring10.3390/rs132144662072-4292https://doaj.org/article/0a4bff786604402896281db7f08f5ca92021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/21/4466https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292The Arctic is under great pressure due to climate change. Drones are increasingly used as a tool in ecology and may be especially valuable in rapidly changing and remote landscapes, as can be found in the Arctic. For effective applications of drones, decisions of both ecological and technical character are needed. Here, we provide our method planning workflow for generating ground-cover maps with drones for ecological monitoring purposes. The workflow includes the selection of variables, layer resolutions, ground-cover classes and the development and validation of models. We implemented this workflow in a case study of the Arctic tundra to develop vegetation maps, including disturbed vegetation, at three study sites in Svalbard. For each site, we generated a high-resolution map of tundra vegetation using supervised random forest (RF) classifiers based on four spectral bands, the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and three types of terrain variables—all derived from drone imagery. Our classifiers distinguished up to 15 different ground-cover classes, including two classes that identify vegetation state changes due to disturbance caused by herbivory (i.e., goose grubbing) and winter damage (i.e., ‘rain-on-snow’ and thaw-freeze). Areas classified as goose grubbing or winter damage had lower NDVI values than their undisturbed counterparts. The predictive ability of site-specific RF models was good (macro-F1 scores between 83% and 85%), but the area of the grubbing class was overestimated in parts of the moss tundra. A direct transfer of the models between study sites was not possible (macro-F1 scores under 50%). We show that drone image analysis can be an asset for studying future vegetation state changes on local scales in Arctic tundra ecosystems and encourage ecologists to use our tailored workflow to integrate drone mapping into long-term monitoring programs.Isabell EischeidEeva M. SoininenJakob J. AssmannRolf A. ImsJesper MadsenÅshild Ø. PedersenFrancesco PirottiNigel G. YoccozVirve T. RavolainenMDPI AGarticleclassifierdisturbancedroneecological monitoringGLCMherbivoreScienceQENRemote Sensing, Vol 13, Iss 4466, p 4466 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic classifier
disturbance
drone
ecological monitoring
GLCM
herbivore
Science
Q
spellingShingle classifier
disturbance
drone
ecological monitoring
GLCM
herbivore
Science
Q
Isabell Eischeid
Eeva M. Soininen
Jakob J. Assmann
Rolf A. Ims
Jesper Madsen
Åshild Ø. Pedersen
Francesco Pirotti
Nigel G. Yoccoz
Virve T. Ravolainen
Disturbance Mapping in Arctic Tundra Improved by a Planning Workflow for Drone Studies: Advancing Tools for Future Ecosystem Monitoring
description The Arctic is under great pressure due to climate change. Drones are increasingly used as a tool in ecology and may be especially valuable in rapidly changing and remote landscapes, as can be found in the Arctic. For effective applications of drones, decisions of both ecological and technical character are needed. Here, we provide our method planning workflow for generating ground-cover maps with drones for ecological monitoring purposes. The workflow includes the selection of variables, layer resolutions, ground-cover classes and the development and validation of models. We implemented this workflow in a case study of the Arctic tundra to develop vegetation maps, including disturbed vegetation, at three study sites in Svalbard. For each site, we generated a high-resolution map of tundra vegetation using supervised random forest (RF) classifiers based on four spectral bands, the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and three types of terrain variables—all derived from drone imagery. Our classifiers distinguished up to 15 different ground-cover classes, including two classes that identify vegetation state changes due to disturbance caused by herbivory (i.e., goose grubbing) and winter damage (i.e., ‘rain-on-snow’ and thaw-freeze). Areas classified as goose grubbing or winter damage had lower NDVI values than their undisturbed counterparts. The predictive ability of site-specific RF models was good (macro-F1 scores between 83% and 85%), but the area of the grubbing class was overestimated in parts of the moss tundra. A direct transfer of the models between study sites was not possible (macro-F1 scores under 50%). We show that drone image analysis can be an asset for studying future vegetation state changes on local scales in Arctic tundra ecosystems and encourage ecologists to use our tailored workflow to integrate drone mapping into long-term monitoring programs.
format article
author Isabell Eischeid
Eeva M. Soininen
Jakob J. Assmann
Rolf A. Ims
Jesper Madsen
Åshild Ø. Pedersen
Francesco Pirotti
Nigel G. Yoccoz
Virve T. Ravolainen
author_facet Isabell Eischeid
Eeva M. Soininen
Jakob J. Assmann
Rolf A. Ims
Jesper Madsen
Åshild Ø. Pedersen
Francesco Pirotti
Nigel G. Yoccoz
Virve T. Ravolainen
author_sort Isabell Eischeid
title Disturbance Mapping in Arctic Tundra Improved by a Planning Workflow for Drone Studies: Advancing Tools for Future Ecosystem Monitoring
title_short Disturbance Mapping in Arctic Tundra Improved by a Planning Workflow for Drone Studies: Advancing Tools for Future Ecosystem Monitoring
title_full Disturbance Mapping in Arctic Tundra Improved by a Planning Workflow for Drone Studies: Advancing Tools for Future Ecosystem Monitoring
title_fullStr Disturbance Mapping in Arctic Tundra Improved by a Planning Workflow for Drone Studies: Advancing Tools for Future Ecosystem Monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Disturbance Mapping in Arctic Tundra Improved by a Planning Workflow for Drone Studies: Advancing Tools for Future Ecosystem Monitoring
title_sort disturbance mapping in arctic tundra improved by a planning workflow for drone studies: advancing tools for future ecosystem monitoring
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/0a4bff786604402896281db7f08f5ca9
work_keys_str_mv AT isabelleischeid disturbancemappinginarctictundraimprovedbyaplanningworkflowfordronestudiesadvancingtoolsforfutureecosystemmonitoring
AT eevamsoininen disturbancemappinginarctictundraimprovedbyaplanningworkflowfordronestudiesadvancingtoolsforfutureecosystemmonitoring
AT jakobjassmann disturbancemappinginarctictundraimprovedbyaplanningworkflowfordronestudiesadvancingtoolsforfutureecosystemmonitoring
AT rolfaims disturbancemappinginarctictundraimprovedbyaplanningworkflowfordronestudiesadvancingtoolsforfutureecosystemmonitoring
AT jespermadsen disturbancemappinginarctictundraimprovedbyaplanningworkflowfordronestudiesadvancingtoolsforfutureecosystemmonitoring
AT ashildøpedersen disturbancemappinginarctictundraimprovedbyaplanningworkflowfordronestudiesadvancingtoolsforfutureecosystemmonitoring
AT francescopirotti disturbancemappinginarctictundraimprovedbyaplanningworkflowfordronestudiesadvancingtoolsforfutureecosystemmonitoring
AT nigelgyoccoz disturbancemappinginarctictundraimprovedbyaplanningworkflowfordronestudiesadvancingtoolsforfutureecosystemmonitoring
AT virvetravolainen disturbancemappinginarctictundraimprovedbyaplanningworkflowfordronestudiesadvancingtoolsforfutureecosystemmonitoring
_version_ 1718431626750328832