Chapter 39 of the Magna Carta in the Interpretation of Russian Historians Alexander N. Savin and Paul G. Vinogradoff
The analysis of interpretations of chapter 39 of the Magna Carta proposed by two prominent Russian historians A. N. Savin and P. G. Vinogradov is carried out. It is shown that, although the editors of the Magna Carta of 1225 were of great importance in the constitutional development of England, the...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | RU |
| Publicado: |
Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/0aa6277bb3c34afe86d9d3deaa41c51f |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:0aa6277bb3c34afe86d9d3deaa41c51f |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:0aa6277bb3c34afe86d9d3deaa41c51f2021-12-02T07:58:08ZChapter 39 of the Magna Carta in the Interpretation of Russian Historians Alexander N. Savin and Paul G. Vinogradoff2225-756X2227-129510.24224/2227-1295-2019-9-336-348https://doaj.org/article/0aa6277bb3c34afe86d9d3deaa41c51f2019-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/1314https://doaj.org/toc/2225-756Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2227-1295The analysis of interpretations of chapter 39 of the Magna Carta proposed by two prominent Russian historians A. N. Savin and P. G. Vinogradov is carried out. It is shown that, although the editors of the Magna Carta of 1225 were of great importance in the constitutional development of England, the authors used the edition of 1215. It is noted that A. N. Savin was interested in the social realities hidden behind the words and formulas of chapter 39: in his opinion, the article reflected the interests of the baronial opposition of the royal power, the feudal lords under “free” meant themselves and wanted to fix guarantees against arbitrariness, while one of instruments to protect the rights and privileges of tycoons was to become a class court - the “court of equals”, or “the court of peers”. The opinion of another historian, P. G. Vinograd, who focused on the adaptive capabilities of chapter 39 of the Magna Charter, is presented: the term free , which in this article refers to barons, was later transferred to other categories of the population, including the Villans; the term country law , which means “customs and laws”, later came to mean “legality, and the further interpretation of "legality” and “law” led to the king’s prerogative of arbitrary arrests being more and more perceived as an exception, but not a rule.S. V. KondratievTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovarticle39 статьяmagna cartachapter 39alexander n. savinpaul g. vinogradoffreceptionadaptationSlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665RUНаучный диалог, Vol 0, Iss 9, Pp 336-348 (2019) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
RU |
| topic |
39 статья magna carta chapter 39 alexander n. savin paul g. vinogradoff reception adaptation Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 |
| spellingShingle |
39 статья magna carta chapter 39 alexander n. savin paul g. vinogradoff reception adaptation Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 S. V. Kondratiev Chapter 39 of the Magna Carta in the Interpretation of Russian Historians Alexander N. Savin and Paul G. Vinogradoff |
| description |
The analysis of interpretations of chapter 39 of the Magna Carta proposed by two prominent Russian historians A. N. Savin and P. G. Vinogradov is carried out. It is shown that, although the editors of the Magna Carta of 1225 were of great importance in the constitutional development of England, the authors used the edition of 1215. It is noted that A. N. Savin was interested in the social realities hidden behind the words and formulas of chapter 39: in his opinion, the article reflected the interests of the baronial opposition of the royal power, the feudal lords under “free” meant themselves and wanted to fix guarantees against arbitrariness, while one of instruments to protect the rights and privileges of tycoons was to become a class court - the “court of equals”, or “the court of peers”. The opinion of another historian, P. G. Vinograd, who focused on the adaptive capabilities of chapter 39 of the Magna Charter, is presented: the term free , which in this article refers to barons, was later transferred to other categories of the population, including the Villans; the term country law , which means “customs and laws”, later came to mean “legality, and the further interpretation of "legality” and “law” led to the king’s prerogative of arbitrary arrests being more and more perceived as an exception, but not a rule. |
| format |
article |
| author |
S. V. Kondratiev |
| author_facet |
S. V. Kondratiev |
| author_sort |
S. V. Kondratiev |
| title |
Chapter 39 of the Magna Carta in the Interpretation of Russian Historians Alexander N. Savin and Paul G. Vinogradoff |
| title_short |
Chapter 39 of the Magna Carta in the Interpretation of Russian Historians Alexander N. Savin and Paul G. Vinogradoff |
| title_full |
Chapter 39 of the Magna Carta in the Interpretation of Russian Historians Alexander N. Savin and Paul G. Vinogradoff |
| title_fullStr |
Chapter 39 of the Magna Carta in the Interpretation of Russian Historians Alexander N. Savin and Paul G. Vinogradoff |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Chapter 39 of the Magna Carta in the Interpretation of Russian Historians Alexander N. Savin and Paul G. Vinogradoff |
| title_sort |
chapter 39 of the magna carta in the interpretation of russian historians alexander n. savin and paul g. vinogradoff |
| publisher |
Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/0aa6277bb3c34afe86d9d3deaa41c51f |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT svkondratiev chapter39ofthemagnacartaintheinterpretationofrussianhistoriansalexandernsavinandpaulgvinogradoff |
| _version_ |
1718398894852800512 |