Explanation of Stephen Hawking’s fallacy of the Big Bang Theory and denial of the existence of God

Hawking emphasizes the big bang theory as a practical theory, thus answering the question of how the universe began. It has been emphasized by Stephan Hawking. He, according to this ideology has had various outcomes related to the concept of God and the beginning of existence. He believes that all o...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mikaeel Jamalpoor, Mir Mehdi Behboodi Tolon
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FA
Publicado: University of Tabriz 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0abe546957ff40688ad971f1f331c141
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0abe546957ff40688ad971f1f331c141
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0abe546957ff40688ad971f1f331c1412021-11-29T06:23:05ZExplanation of Stephen Hawking’s fallacy of the Big Bang Theory and denial of the existence of God2251-79602423-441910.22034/jpiut.2021.47386.2933https://doaj.org/article/0abe546957ff40688ad971f1f331c1412021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_13859_240f64e55922f399abb013eb9afb9184.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2251-7960https://doaj.org/toc/2423-4419Hawking emphasizes the big bang theory as a practical theory, thus answering the question of how the universe began. It has been emphasized by Stephan Hawking. He, according to this ideology has had various outcomes related to the concept of God and the beginning of existence. He believes that all of Universal Existence is comprised of Material, Energy, and Laws of Physics, eventually leading to the independence of a Metaphysical God's existence for creation of the universe. This logical-fallacy study is based on the hypothesis that the Big Bang theory cannot be positive about the existence or non-existence of God. The main issue is the possibility of replacing God in the big bang. Since Hawking's expression of such an argument is distorted by the fallacy of detailed composition or co-authorship, it lacks philosophical rationality from a philosophical point of view. The explanation of what Hawking’s -with inconsistent differences- has expressed about this topic sheds light on the big bang being termed as the starting point of the creation of the universe cannot be convincing. This article seeks to explore the argument for the Big Bang theory to prove the non-existence of God and to apply rationality and the laws of logic to achieve the designated goal.Mikaeel JamalpoorMir Mehdi Behboodi TolonUniversity of Tabrizarticlebig bang theorystephan hawkinglogical fallacystart of creationdenial of the existence of godPhilosophy (General)B1-5802ENFAPhilosophical Investigations, Vol 15, Iss 36, Pp 307-318 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FA
topic big bang theory
stephan hawking
logical fallacy
start of creation
denial of the existence of god
Philosophy (General)
B1-5802
spellingShingle big bang theory
stephan hawking
logical fallacy
start of creation
denial of the existence of god
Philosophy (General)
B1-5802
Mikaeel Jamalpoor
Mir Mehdi Behboodi Tolon
Explanation of Stephen Hawking’s fallacy of the Big Bang Theory and denial of the existence of God
description Hawking emphasizes the big bang theory as a practical theory, thus answering the question of how the universe began. It has been emphasized by Stephan Hawking. He, according to this ideology has had various outcomes related to the concept of God and the beginning of existence. He believes that all of Universal Existence is comprised of Material, Energy, and Laws of Physics, eventually leading to the independence of a Metaphysical God's existence for creation of the universe. This logical-fallacy study is based on the hypothesis that the Big Bang theory cannot be positive about the existence or non-existence of God. The main issue is the possibility of replacing God in the big bang. Since Hawking's expression of such an argument is distorted by the fallacy of detailed composition or co-authorship, it lacks philosophical rationality from a philosophical point of view. The explanation of what Hawking’s -with inconsistent differences- has expressed about this topic sheds light on the big bang being termed as the starting point of the creation of the universe cannot be convincing. This article seeks to explore the argument for the Big Bang theory to prove the non-existence of God and to apply rationality and the laws of logic to achieve the designated goal.
format article
author Mikaeel Jamalpoor
Mir Mehdi Behboodi Tolon
author_facet Mikaeel Jamalpoor
Mir Mehdi Behboodi Tolon
author_sort Mikaeel Jamalpoor
title Explanation of Stephen Hawking’s fallacy of the Big Bang Theory and denial of the existence of God
title_short Explanation of Stephen Hawking’s fallacy of the Big Bang Theory and denial of the existence of God
title_full Explanation of Stephen Hawking’s fallacy of the Big Bang Theory and denial of the existence of God
title_fullStr Explanation of Stephen Hawking’s fallacy of the Big Bang Theory and denial of the existence of God
title_full_unstemmed Explanation of Stephen Hawking’s fallacy of the Big Bang Theory and denial of the existence of God
title_sort explanation of stephen hawking’s fallacy of the big bang theory and denial of the existence of god
publisher University of Tabriz
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/0abe546957ff40688ad971f1f331c141
work_keys_str_mv AT mikaeeljamalpoor explanationofstephenhawkingsfallacyofthebigbangtheoryanddenialoftheexistenceofgod
AT mirmehdibehbooditolon explanationofstephenhawkingsfallacyofthebigbangtheoryanddenialoftheexistenceofgod
_version_ 1718407506118574080