Deconstructing Buddhist Extremism: Lessons from Sri Lanka

This article argues that it is not Buddhism, per se, but rather Buddhist extremism, that is responsible for violence against relevant out-groups. Moreover, it suggests that the causes of Buddhist extremism, rather than being determined solely by textual and scriptural justifications for out-group vi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kumar Ramakrishna
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0ac9851abc174501bdeb8c81c38da205
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0ac9851abc174501bdeb8c81c38da205
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0ac9851abc174501bdeb8c81c38da2052021-11-25T18:52:59ZDeconstructing Buddhist Extremism: Lessons from Sri Lanka10.3390/rel121109702077-1444https://doaj.org/article/0ac9851abc174501bdeb8c81c38da2052021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/11/970https://doaj.org/toc/2077-1444This article argues that it is not Buddhism, per se, but rather Buddhist extremism, that is responsible for violence against relevant out-groups. Moreover, it suggests that the causes of Buddhist extremism, rather than being determined solely by textual and scriptural justifications for out-group violence, are rooted instead in the intersection between social psychology and theology, rather than organically arising from the latter, per se. This article unpacks this argument by a deeper exploration of Theravada Buddhist extremism in Sri Lanka. It argues that religious extremism, including its Buddhist variant, is best understood as a fundamentalist belief system that justifies structural violence against relevant out-groups. A total of seven of the core characteristics of the religious extremist are identified and employed to better grasp how Buddhist extremism in Sri Lanka manifests itself on the ground. These are: the fixation with maintaining identity supremacy; in-group bias; out-group prejudice; emphasis on preserving in-group purity via avoidance of commingling with the out-group; low integrative complexity expressed in binary thinking; dangerous speech in both soft- and hard-modes; and finally, the quest for political power, by force if needed. Future research could, inter alia, explore how these seven characteristics also adequately describe other types of religious extremism.Kumar RamakrishnaMDPI AGarticlereligious extremismBuddhist extremism in Sri LankaBuddhist extremismBodu Bala SenaGalagoda Atte Gnanasara TheroReligions. Mythology. RationalismBL1-2790ENReligions, Vol 12, Iss 970, p 970 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic religious extremism
Buddhist extremism in Sri Lanka
Buddhist extremism
Bodu Bala Sena
Galagoda Atte Gnanasara Thero
Religions. Mythology. Rationalism
BL1-2790
spellingShingle religious extremism
Buddhist extremism in Sri Lanka
Buddhist extremism
Bodu Bala Sena
Galagoda Atte Gnanasara Thero
Religions. Mythology. Rationalism
BL1-2790
Kumar Ramakrishna
Deconstructing Buddhist Extremism: Lessons from Sri Lanka
description This article argues that it is not Buddhism, per se, but rather Buddhist extremism, that is responsible for violence against relevant out-groups. Moreover, it suggests that the causes of Buddhist extremism, rather than being determined solely by textual and scriptural justifications for out-group violence, are rooted instead in the intersection between social psychology and theology, rather than organically arising from the latter, per se. This article unpacks this argument by a deeper exploration of Theravada Buddhist extremism in Sri Lanka. It argues that religious extremism, including its Buddhist variant, is best understood as a fundamentalist belief system that justifies structural violence against relevant out-groups. A total of seven of the core characteristics of the religious extremist are identified and employed to better grasp how Buddhist extremism in Sri Lanka manifests itself on the ground. These are: the fixation with maintaining identity supremacy; in-group bias; out-group prejudice; emphasis on preserving in-group purity via avoidance of commingling with the out-group; low integrative complexity expressed in binary thinking; dangerous speech in both soft- and hard-modes; and finally, the quest for political power, by force if needed. Future research could, inter alia, explore how these seven characteristics also adequately describe other types of religious extremism.
format article
author Kumar Ramakrishna
author_facet Kumar Ramakrishna
author_sort Kumar Ramakrishna
title Deconstructing Buddhist Extremism: Lessons from Sri Lanka
title_short Deconstructing Buddhist Extremism: Lessons from Sri Lanka
title_full Deconstructing Buddhist Extremism: Lessons from Sri Lanka
title_fullStr Deconstructing Buddhist Extremism: Lessons from Sri Lanka
title_full_unstemmed Deconstructing Buddhist Extremism: Lessons from Sri Lanka
title_sort deconstructing buddhist extremism: lessons from sri lanka
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/0ac9851abc174501bdeb8c81c38da205
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarramakrishna deconstructingbuddhistextremismlessonsfromsrilanka
_version_ 1718410569931816960