MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATÜRK and OTTO VON BISMARCK AS STATASMEN

Builder of German Union, Bismarck and founder of Turkish Republic, Atatürk had various similarities and differences. One of these leaders served for the establishment of German State by combining separated Germans under Prussia, which was a rooted government, while the other leader saved his country...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sevilay ÖZER
Formato: article
Lenguaje:DE
EN
FR
TR
Publicado: Fırat University 2019
Materias:
H
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0af34754d7664a4199d52c13c91e70e2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0af34754d7664a4199d52c13c91e70e2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0af34754d7664a4199d52c13c91e70e22021-11-24T09:20:58ZMUSTAFA KEMAL ATATÜRK and OTTO VON BISMARCK AS STATASMEN2148-416310.9761/JASSS2404https://doaj.org/article/0af34754d7664a4199d52c13c91e70e22019-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jasstudies.com/index.jsp?mod=tammetin&makaleadi=388857999_27-%20Yrd.%20Do%C3%A7.%20Dr.%20Sevilay%20%C3%96ZER.pdf&key=27145https://doaj.org/toc/2148-4163Builder of German Union, Bismarck and founder of Turkish Republic, Atatürk had various similarities and differences. One of these leaders served for the establishment of German State by combining separated Germans under Prussia, which was a rooted government, while the other leader saved his country from the occupation process started with the signing of Armistice of Mondros and succeeded in establishing the New Turkish State. The remarkable common point of the two leaders at this point is that they were quite farsighted. As they had high foresight ability, they had the chance to carefully calculate and determine the steps to be taken. Their sharp wits were one of the most significant factors of the success of their policies. But besides that, it is crucial to present the difference in the methods they applied in order to reach their goals. Bismarck was a leader who believed in that German Union could be established with sword and blood rather than diplomacy. Before the establishment of German Union, he uttered these words; “If we do nothing in order to become hammer, we will become stake”, He clearly explained his views about his policy through these words. Bismarck followed a different political line starting from the fact that political unity was in a very sensitive period after the completion of German Union and he put a policy into practice which was based on protecting peace in order to strengthen Germany. During this process, Germany didn’t follow colonial policy for its self interest which caused Ottoman Empire think that the Germany is a good country. On the other hand, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, started an armed struggle as a result of the imposition of being invaded, in order to reach independence. He started and followed the policy of “Peace at home, Peace in the world” after establishing the State of the Republic of Turkey. These two leaders, who have a significant place in the world political history, left lasting impressions on their nations and other nations as a result of their successes and strategies they pursued. Historian Hermann Pinnow said these about Bismarck; “Picture of the world changed as soon as he acceded; picture of the world changed when he left the work”. A similar comment about Atatürk was published in the newspaper called News Chronicle issued in England: “He is one of these rare men about whom we can say that if Atatürk had lived today, history would be much different…” This is why, it is significant to reveal the similarSevilay ÖZERFırat UniversityarticleatatürkbismarckgermanyturkeySocial SciencesHSocial sciences (General)H1-99DEENFRTRJournal of Academic Social Science Studies , Vol 7, Iss 27, Pp 437-455 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language DE
EN
FR
TR
topic atatürk
bismarck
germany
turkey
Social Sciences
H
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
spellingShingle atatürk
bismarck
germany
turkey
Social Sciences
H
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
Sevilay ÖZER
MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATÜRK and OTTO VON BISMARCK AS STATASMEN
description Builder of German Union, Bismarck and founder of Turkish Republic, Atatürk had various similarities and differences. One of these leaders served for the establishment of German State by combining separated Germans under Prussia, which was a rooted government, while the other leader saved his country from the occupation process started with the signing of Armistice of Mondros and succeeded in establishing the New Turkish State. The remarkable common point of the two leaders at this point is that they were quite farsighted. As they had high foresight ability, they had the chance to carefully calculate and determine the steps to be taken. Their sharp wits were one of the most significant factors of the success of their policies. But besides that, it is crucial to present the difference in the methods they applied in order to reach their goals. Bismarck was a leader who believed in that German Union could be established with sword and blood rather than diplomacy. Before the establishment of German Union, he uttered these words; “If we do nothing in order to become hammer, we will become stake”, He clearly explained his views about his policy through these words. Bismarck followed a different political line starting from the fact that political unity was in a very sensitive period after the completion of German Union and he put a policy into practice which was based on protecting peace in order to strengthen Germany. During this process, Germany didn’t follow colonial policy for its self interest which caused Ottoman Empire think that the Germany is a good country. On the other hand, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, started an armed struggle as a result of the imposition of being invaded, in order to reach independence. He started and followed the policy of “Peace at home, Peace in the world” after establishing the State of the Republic of Turkey. These two leaders, who have a significant place in the world political history, left lasting impressions on their nations and other nations as a result of their successes and strategies they pursued. Historian Hermann Pinnow said these about Bismarck; “Picture of the world changed as soon as he acceded; picture of the world changed when he left the work”. A similar comment about Atatürk was published in the newspaper called News Chronicle issued in England: “He is one of these rare men about whom we can say that if Atatürk had lived today, history would be much different…” This is why, it is significant to reveal the similar
format article
author Sevilay ÖZER
author_facet Sevilay ÖZER
author_sort Sevilay ÖZER
title MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATÜRK and OTTO VON BISMARCK AS STATASMEN
title_short MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATÜRK and OTTO VON BISMARCK AS STATASMEN
title_full MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATÜRK and OTTO VON BISMARCK AS STATASMEN
title_fullStr MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATÜRK and OTTO VON BISMARCK AS STATASMEN
title_full_unstemmed MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATÜRK and OTTO VON BISMARCK AS STATASMEN
title_sort mustafa kemal atatürk and otto von bismarck as statasmen
publisher Fırat University
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/0af34754d7664a4199d52c13c91e70e2
work_keys_str_mv AT sevilayozer mustafakemalataturkandottovonbismarckasstatasmen
_version_ 1718415337009971200