The association between self-reported stress and cardiovascular measures in daily life: A systematic review.

<h4>Background</h4>Stress plays an important role in the development of mental illness, and an increasing number of studies is trying to detect moments of perceived stress in everyday life based on physiological data gathered using ambulatory devices. However, based on laboratory studies...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas Vaessen, Aki Rintala, Natalya Otsabryk, Wolfgang Viechtbauer, Martien Wampers, Stephan Claes, Inez Myin-Germeys
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0b21c59f5fbb410298af336cb9dcf58a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0b21c59f5fbb410298af336cb9dcf58a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0b21c59f5fbb410298af336cb9dcf58a2021-12-02T20:12:40ZThe association between self-reported stress and cardiovascular measures in daily life: A systematic review.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0259557https://doaj.org/article/0b21c59f5fbb410298af336cb9dcf58a2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259557https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Stress plays an important role in the development of mental illness, and an increasing number of studies is trying to detect moments of perceived stress in everyday life based on physiological data gathered using ambulatory devices. However, based on laboratory studies, there is only modest evidence for a relationship between self-reported stress and physiological ambulatory measures. This descriptive systematic review evaluates the evidence for studies investigating an association between self-reported stress and physiological measures under daily life conditions.<h4>Methods</h4>Three databases were searched for articles assessing an association between self-reported stress and cardiovascular and skin conductance measures simultaneously over the course of at least a day.<h4>Results</h4>We reviewed findings of 36 studies investigating an association between self-reported stress and cardiovascular measures with overall 135 analyses of associations between self-reported stress and cardiovascular measures. Overall, 35% of all analyses showed a significant or marginally significant association in the expected direction. The most consistent results were found for perceived stress, high-arousal negative affect scales, and event-related self-reported stress measures, and for frequency-domain heart rate variability physiological measures. There was much heterogeneity in measures and methods.<h4>Conclusion</h4>These findings confirm that daily-life stress-dynamics are complex and require a better understanding. Choices in design and measurement seem to play a role. We provide some guidance for future studies.Thomas VaessenAki RintalaNatalya OtsabrykWolfgang ViechtbauerMartien WampersStephan ClaesInez Myin-GermeysPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 11, p e0259557 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Thomas Vaessen
Aki Rintala
Natalya Otsabryk
Wolfgang Viechtbauer
Martien Wampers
Stephan Claes
Inez Myin-Germeys
The association between self-reported stress and cardiovascular measures in daily life: A systematic review.
description <h4>Background</h4>Stress plays an important role in the development of mental illness, and an increasing number of studies is trying to detect moments of perceived stress in everyday life based on physiological data gathered using ambulatory devices. However, based on laboratory studies, there is only modest evidence for a relationship between self-reported stress and physiological ambulatory measures. This descriptive systematic review evaluates the evidence for studies investigating an association between self-reported stress and physiological measures under daily life conditions.<h4>Methods</h4>Three databases were searched for articles assessing an association between self-reported stress and cardiovascular and skin conductance measures simultaneously over the course of at least a day.<h4>Results</h4>We reviewed findings of 36 studies investigating an association between self-reported stress and cardiovascular measures with overall 135 analyses of associations between self-reported stress and cardiovascular measures. Overall, 35% of all analyses showed a significant or marginally significant association in the expected direction. The most consistent results were found for perceived stress, high-arousal negative affect scales, and event-related self-reported stress measures, and for frequency-domain heart rate variability physiological measures. There was much heterogeneity in measures and methods.<h4>Conclusion</h4>These findings confirm that daily-life stress-dynamics are complex and require a better understanding. Choices in design and measurement seem to play a role. We provide some guidance for future studies.
format article
author Thomas Vaessen
Aki Rintala
Natalya Otsabryk
Wolfgang Viechtbauer
Martien Wampers
Stephan Claes
Inez Myin-Germeys
author_facet Thomas Vaessen
Aki Rintala
Natalya Otsabryk
Wolfgang Viechtbauer
Martien Wampers
Stephan Claes
Inez Myin-Germeys
author_sort Thomas Vaessen
title The association between self-reported stress and cardiovascular measures in daily life: A systematic review.
title_short The association between self-reported stress and cardiovascular measures in daily life: A systematic review.
title_full The association between self-reported stress and cardiovascular measures in daily life: A systematic review.
title_fullStr The association between self-reported stress and cardiovascular measures in daily life: A systematic review.
title_full_unstemmed The association between self-reported stress and cardiovascular measures in daily life: A systematic review.
title_sort association between self-reported stress and cardiovascular measures in daily life: a systematic review.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/0b21c59f5fbb410298af336cb9dcf58a
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasvaessen theassociationbetweenselfreportedstressandcardiovascularmeasuresindailylifeasystematicreview
AT akirintala theassociationbetweenselfreportedstressandcardiovascularmeasuresindailylifeasystematicreview
AT natalyaotsabryk theassociationbetweenselfreportedstressandcardiovascularmeasuresindailylifeasystematicreview
AT wolfgangviechtbauer theassociationbetweenselfreportedstressandcardiovascularmeasuresindailylifeasystematicreview
AT martienwampers theassociationbetweenselfreportedstressandcardiovascularmeasuresindailylifeasystematicreview
AT stephanclaes theassociationbetweenselfreportedstressandcardiovascularmeasuresindailylifeasystematicreview
AT inezmyingermeys theassociationbetweenselfreportedstressandcardiovascularmeasuresindailylifeasystematicreview
AT thomasvaessen associationbetweenselfreportedstressandcardiovascularmeasuresindailylifeasystematicreview
AT akirintala associationbetweenselfreportedstressandcardiovascularmeasuresindailylifeasystematicreview
AT natalyaotsabryk associationbetweenselfreportedstressandcardiovascularmeasuresindailylifeasystematicreview
AT wolfgangviechtbauer associationbetweenselfreportedstressandcardiovascularmeasuresindailylifeasystematicreview
AT martienwampers associationbetweenselfreportedstressandcardiovascularmeasuresindailylifeasystematicreview
AT stephanclaes associationbetweenselfreportedstressandcardiovascularmeasuresindailylifeasystematicreview
AT inezmyingermeys associationbetweenselfreportedstressandcardiovascularmeasuresindailylifeasystematicreview
_version_ 1718374866382487552