Lines in the sand: pre-interview rank and probability of receiving admission to medical school

Background: We provide an examination of one medical school’s attempt to determine whether their cut-off point for number of interviews offered is congruent with the probability these applicants’ have for admission post-interview. Methods: Offer probability was determined by organizing pre-intervi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raquel Burgess, Meredith Vanstone, Margo Mountjoy, Lawrence Grierson
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Canadian Medical Education Journal 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0b2f671c1bd54113ac13179d983bf6dc
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0b2f671c1bd54113ac13179d983bf6dc
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0b2f671c1bd54113ac13179d983bf6dc2021-12-01T22:43:48ZLines in the sand: pre-interview rank and probability of receiving admission to medical school10.36834/cmej.612751923-1202https://doaj.org/article/0b2f671c1bd54113ac13179d983bf6dc2019-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cmej/article/view/61275https://doaj.org/toc/1923-1202Background: We provide an examination of one medical school’s attempt to determine whether their cut-off point for number of interviews offered is congruent with the probability these applicants’ have for admission post-interview. Methods: Offer probability was determined by organizing pre-interview rankings from 2013-2017 (n = 2,659) applicant cohorts into bins of 50 applicants and finding the quotient of successful and total applicants in each bin.A linear-by-linear association Chi-square test and adjusted standardized residuals with an applied Bonferroni correction were used to determine if the observed frequencies in each bin were different than expected by chance. A Spearman Correlation analysis between pre- and post-interview ranks was conducted. Results: All applicants have between a 50.0% and 76.4% chance of admission. Observed frequencies are different than chance (χ(1)=50.835, p<.001), with a significantly greater number of offers seen in the bins between 1 and 100 (p<.001 for both bins). There is a weak positive relationship between pre- and post-rank, rs(2657)= 0.258, p<.001. Conclusion: The results indicate the number of interviews conducted does not exceed a threshold wherein individuals with a relatively low chance of admission are interviewed. Findings are interpreted with respect to ethical resource allocation for both programs and applicants. Raquel BurgessMeredith VanstoneMargo MountjoyLawrence GriersonCanadian Medical Education JournalarticleEducation (General)L7-991Medicine (General)R5-920ENCanadian Medical Education Journal, Vol 10, Iss 3 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Education (General)
L7-991
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle Education (General)
L7-991
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Raquel Burgess
Meredith Vanstone
Margo Mountjoy
Lawrence Grierson
Lines in the sand: pre-interview rank and probability of receiving admission to medical school
description Background: We provide an examination of one medical school’s attempt to determine whether their cut-off point for number of interviews offered is congruent with the probability these applicants’ have for admission post-interview. Methods: Offer probability was determined by organizing pre-interview rankings from 2013-2017 (n = 2,659) applicant cohorts into bins of 50 applicants and finding the quotient of successful and total applicants in each bin.A linear-by-linear association Chi-square test and adjusted standardized residuals with an applied Bonferroni correction were used to determine if the observed frequencies in each bin were different than expected by chance. A Spearman Correlation analysis between pre- and post-interview ranks was conducted. Results: All applicants have between a 50.0% and 76.4% chance of admission. Observed frequencies are different than chance (χ(1)=50.835, p<.001), with a significantly greater number of offers seen in the bins between 1 and 100 (p<.001 for both bins). There is a weak positive relationship between pre- and post-rank, rs(2657)= 0.258, p<.001. Conclusion: The results indicate the number of interviews conducted does not exceed a threshold wherein individuals with a relatively low chance of admission are interviewed. Findings are interpreted with respect to ethical resource allocation for both programs and applicants.
format article
author Raquel Burgess
Meredith Vanstone
Margo Mountjoy
Lawrence Grierson
author_facet Raquel Burgess
Meredith Vanstone
Margo Mountjoy
Lawrence Grierson
author_sort Raquel Burgess
title Lines in the sand: pre-interview rank and probability of receiving admission to medical school
title_short Lines in the sand: pre-interview rank and probability of receiving admission to medical school
title_full Lines in the sand: pre-interview rank and probability of receiving admission to medical school
title_fullStr Lines in the sand: pre-interview rank and probability of receiving admission to medical school
title_full_unstemmed Lines in the sand: pre-interview rank and probability of receiving admission to medical school
title_sort lines in the sand: pre-interview rank and probability of receiving admission to medical school
publisher Canadian Medical Education Journal
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/0b2f671c1bd54113ac13179d983bf6dc
work_keys_str_mv AT raquelburgess linesinthesandpreinterviewrankandprobabilityofreceivingadmissiontomedicalschool
AT meredithvanstone linesinthesandpreinterviewrankandprobabilityofreceivingadmissiontomedicalschool
AT margomountjoy linesinthesandpreinterviewrankandprobabilityofreceivingadmissiontomedicalschool
AT lawrencegrierson linesinthesandpreinterviewrankandprobabilityofreceivingadmissiontomedicalschool
_version_ 1718404025203818496