Which technology diversification index should be selected?: Insights for diversification perspectives

The implacable list of diversification indices allows a wide range of selection opportunities for the researchers. The absence of consensus on the selection of suitable technology diversification index, however, may lead to a lack of objectivity with ample grounds. In this study, we focus on the cas...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keungoui Kim, Junseok Hwang, Sungdo Jung, Eungdo Kim
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0ba690e20fff49c6a3f8446cdc3c0dc3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0ba690e20fff49c6a3f8446cdc3c0dc3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0ba690e20fff49c6a3f8446cdc3c0dc32021-12-02T16:42:10ZWhich technology diversification index should be selected?: Insights for diversification perspectives2331-197510.1080/23311975.2019.1643519https://doaj.org/article/0ba690e20fff49c6a3f8446cdc3c0dc32019-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1643519https://doaj.org/toc/2331-1975The implacable list of diversification indices allows a wide range of selection opportunities for the researchers. The absence of consensus on the selection of suitable technology diversification index, however, may lead to a lack of objectivity with ample grounds. In this study, we focus on the case of technology diversification using patent to derive empirical implication for selecting suitable diversification index. To obtain the content validity of diversification index, three cases were tested: cross section, single and multiple time periods. As a result, diversification indices are separated into two groups: HHI, Gini-Simpson, 1/HHI, and Entropy for PC1 and Variety and Rao-Stirling for PC2. In this context, technology diversification can be explained by two perspectives of diversification: balance-centered and hetero-centered diversification. The balance-centered diversification implies the proportion of elements are the target of interest while hetero-centered diversification refers to variety and disparity of diversification, which focuses on the degree of differentiation among elements. In applicant-level technology diversification studies, these two diversification perspectives are recommended to be used. Subject classification codes: include these here if the journal requires themKeungoui KimJunseok HwangSungdo JungEungdo KimTaylor & Francis Grouparticlediversification indextechnology diversificationpatentprincipal component analysisBusinessHF5001-6182Management. Industrial managementHD28-70ENCogent Business & Management, Vol 6, Iss 1 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic diversification index
technology diversification
patent
principal component analysis
Business
HF5001-6182
Management. Industrial management
HD28-70
spellingShingle diversification index
technology diversification
patent
principal component analysis
Business
HF5001-6182
Management. Industrial management
HD28-70
Keungoui Kim
Junseok Hwang
Sungdo Jung
Eungdo Kim
Which technology diversification index should be selected?: Insights for diversification perspectives
description The implacable list of diversification indices allows a wide range of selection opportunities for the researchers. The absence of consensus on the selection of suitable technology diversification index, however, may lead to a lack of objectivity with ample grounds. In this study, we focus on the case of technology diversification using patent to derive empirical implication for selecting suitable diversification index. To obtain the content validity of diversification index, three cases were tested: cross section, single and multiple time periods. As a result, diversification indices are separated into two groups: HHI, Gini-Simpson, 1/HHI, and Entropy for PC1 and Variety and Rao-Stirling for PC2. In this context, technology diversification can be explained by two perspectives of diversification: balance-centered and hetero-centered diversification. The balance-centered diversification implies the proportion of elements are the target of interest while hetero-centered diversification refers to variety and disparity of diversification, which focuses on the degree of differentiation among elements. In applicant-level technology diversification studies, these two diversification perspectives are recommended to be used. Subject classification codes: include these here if the journal requires them
format article
author Keungoui Kim
Junseok Hwang
Sungdo Jung
Eungdo Kim
author_facet Keungoui Kim
Junseok Hwang
Sungdo Jung
Eungdo Kim
author_sort Keungoui Kim
title Which technology diversification index should be selected?: Insights for diversification perspectives
title_short Which technology diversification index should be selected?: Insights for diversification perspectives
title_full Which technology diversification index should be selected?: Insights for diversification perspectives
title_fullStr Which technology diversification index should be selected?: Insights for diversification perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Which technology diversification index should be selected?: Insights for diversification perspectives
title_sort which technology diversification index should be selected?: insights for diversification perspectives
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/0ba690e20fff49c6a3f8446cdc3c0dc3
work_keys_str_mv AT keungouikim whichtechnologydiversificationindexshouldbeselectedinsightsfordiversificationperspectives
AT junseokhwang whichtechnologydiversificationindexshouldbeselectedinsightsfordiversificationperspectives
AT sungdojung whichtechnologydiversificationindexshouldbeselectedinsightsfordiversificationperspectives
AT eungdokim whichtechnologydiversificationindexshouldbeselectedinsightsfordiversificationperspectives
_version_ 1718383555708452864