Philosophy and Logical Positivism
Logical positivists claim that the whole of human knowledge can be reduced to analytic and synthetic sentences, and this means that the only possible knowledge is provided by science. Metaphysics is thus meaningless, because its sentences do not comply with the rules set forth by logical analysis of...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Academicus
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/0bcf8306155146bea9aa7a9d660580b4 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:0bcf8306155146bea9aa7a9d660580b4 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:0bcf8306155146bea9aa7a9d660580b42021-12-02T15:00:03ZPhilosophy and Logical Positivism2079-37152309-108810.7336/academicus.2019.19.02https://doaj.org/article/0bcf8306155146bea9aa7a9d660580b42019-01-01T00:00:00Z http://www.academicus.edu.al/nr19/Academicus-MMXIX-19-032-036.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/2079-3715https://doaj.org/toc/2309-1088Logical positivists claim that the whole of human knowledge can be reduced to analytic and synthetic sentences, and this means that the only possible knowledge is provided by science. Metaphysics is thus meaningless, because its sentences do not comply with the rules set forth by logical analysis of language. What, then, is the philosopher’s job? The members of the Vienna Circle answer that his task is to clarify the concepts used within empirical and formal sciences, while analytic philosophers stress instead the importance of ordinary language’s analysis. But the outcome is in both cases clear: philosophy is linguistic analysis. Howeber, by reducing the whole of reality to empirical reality, logical positivists do metaphysics. We do not have the “elimination” of metaphysics, but just the proposal of an empiricist brand of metaphysics.Michele MarsonetAcademicusarticlelogical positivism; metaphysics; vienna circle; analytic philosophySocial SciencesHEconomics as a scienceHB71-74ENAcademicus International Scientific Journal, Vol MMXIX, Iss 19, Pp 32-36 (2019) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
logical positivism; metaphysics; vienna circle; analytic philosophy Social Sciences H Economics as a science HB71-74 |
spellingShingle |
logical positivism; metaphysics; vienna circle; analytic philosophy Social Sciences H Economics as a science HB71-74 Michele Marsonet Philosophy and Logical Positivism |
description |
Logical positivists claim that the whole of human knowledge can be reduced to analytic and synthetic sentences, and this means that the only possible knowledge is provided by science. Metaphysics is thus meaningless, because its sentences do not comply with the rules set forth by logical analysis of language. What, then, is the philosopher’s job? The members of the Vienna Circle answer that his task is to clarify the concepts used within empirical and formal sciences, while analytic philosophers stress instead the importance of ordinary language’s analysis. But the outcome is in both cases clear: philosophy is linguistic analysis. Howeber, by reducing the whole of reality to empirical reality, logical positivists do metaphysics. We do not have the “elimination” of metaphysics, but just the proposal of an empiricist brand of metaphysics. |
format |
article |
author |
Michele Marsonet |
author_facet |
Michele Marsonet |
author_sort |
Michele Marsonet |
title |
Philosophy and Logical Positivism |
title_short |
Philosophy and Logical Positivism |
title_full |
Philosophy and Logical Positivism |
title_fullStr |
Philosophy and Logical Positivism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Philosophy and Logical Positivism |
title_sort |
philosophy and logical positivism |
publisher |
Academicus |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/0bcf8306155146bea9aa7a9d660580b4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michelemarsonet philosophyandlogicalpositivism |
_version_ |
1718389182702813184 |