A study assessing the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of real-time teledermatopathology

Dermatopathology represents the gold standard for the diagnosis of skin diseases and neoplasms that cannot be diagnosed on clinical grounds alone. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility and to assess the accuracy of an Internet-based real-time (live) teledermatopathology consultation. Tw...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elisabeth Riedl, Masoud Asgari, Diana Alvarez, Irina Margaritescu, Geoffrey J. Gottlieb
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Mattioli1885 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0bdaf1d3805748beb4befe3c161c9ab5
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0bdaf1d3805748beb4befe3c161c9ab5
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0bdaf1d3805748beb4befe3c161c9ab52021-11-17T08:33:12ZA study assessing the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of real-time teledermatopathology2160-9381https://doaj.org/article/0bdaf1d3805748beb4befe3c161c9ab52012-04-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dpcj.org/index.php/dpc/article/view/989https://doaj.org/toc/2160-9381 Dermatopathology represents the gold standard for the diagnosis of skin diseases and neoplasms that cannot be diagnosed on clinical grounds alone. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility and to assess the accuracy of an Internet-based real-time (live) teledermatopathology consultation. Twenty teaching cases and 10 randomly selected routine cases were presented to four expert dermatopathologists, first by real-time teledermatopathology and, subsequently, in a blinded fashion, using light microscopy. Throughout the study the overall diagnostic accuracy did not differ for the two methods. However, the mean level of confidence and the mean observation times differed significantly between real-time teledermatopathology and light microscopy (92.6±0.24% versus 99.5±0.02%, and 96.31±11.55 sec versus 25.47±3.85 sec, respectively). Assessment of routine cases did not produce significant diagnostic differences between the two methods. These results prove that real-time teledermatopathology offers an affordable and technically simple technology that lends itself to training as well as to diagnosis of lesions from routine practice by experts situated at remote sites. Elisabeth RiedlMasoud AsgariDiana AlvarezIrina MargaritescuGeoffrey J. GottliebMattioli1885articleDermatologyRL1-803ENDermatology Practical & Conceptual (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Dermatology
RL1-803
spellingShingle Dermatology
RL1-803
Elisabeth Riedl
Masoud Asgari
Diana Alvarez
Irina Margaritescu
Geoffrey J. Gottlieb
A study assessing the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of real-time teledermatopathology
description Dermatopathology represents the gold standard for the diagnosis of skin diseases and neoplasms that cannot be diagnosed on clinical grounds alone. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility and to assess the accuracy of an Internet-based real-time (live) teledermatopathology consultation. Twenty teaching cases and 10 randomly selected routine cases were presented to four expert dermatopathologists, first by real-time teledermatopathology and, subsequently, in a blinded fashion, using light microscopy. Throughout the study the overall diagnostic accuracy did not differ for the two methods. However, the mean level of confidence and the mean observation times differed significantly between real-time teledermatopathology and light microscopy (92.6±0.24% versus 99.5±0.02%, and 96.31±11.55 sec versus 25.47±3.85 sec, respectively). Assessment of routine cases did not produce significant diagnostic differences between the two methods. These results prove that real-time teledermatopathology offers an affordable and technically simple technology that lends itself to training as well as to diagnosis of lesions from routine practice by experts situated at remote sites.
format article
author Elisabeth Riedl
Masoud Asgari
Diana Alvarez
Irina Margaritescu
Geoffrey J. Gottlieb
author_facet Elisabeth Riedl
Masoud Asgari
Diana Alvarez
Irina Margaritescu
Geoffrey J. Gottlieb
author_sort Elisabeth Riedl
title A study assessing the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of real-time teledermatopathology
title_short A study assessing the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of real-time teledermatopathology
title_full A study assessing the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of real-time teledermatopathology
title_fullStr A study assessing the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of real-time teledermatopathology
title_full_unstemmed A study assessing the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of real-time teledermatopathology
title_sort study assessing the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of real-time teledermatopathology
publisher Mattioli1885
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/0bdaf1d3805748beb4befe3c161c9ab5
work_keys_str_mv AT elisabethriedl astudyassessingthefeasibilityanddiagnosticaccuracyofrealtimeteledermatopathology
AT masoudasgari astudyassessingthefeasibilityanddiagnosticaccuracyofrealtimeteledermatopathology
AT dianaalvarez astudyassessingthefeasibilityanddiagnosticaccuracyofrealtimeteledermatopathology
AT irinamargaritescu astudyassessingthefeasibilityanddiagnosticaccuracyofrealtimeteledermatopathology
AT geoffreyjgottlieb astudyassessingthefeasibilityanddiagnosticaccuracyofrealtimeteledermatopathology
AT elisabethriedl studyassessingthefeasibilityanddiagnosticaccuracyofrealtimeteledermatopathology
AT masoudasgari studyassessingthefeasibilityanddiagnosticaccuracyofrealtimeteledermatopathology
AT dianaalvarez studyassessingthefeasibilityanddiagnosticaccuracyofrealtimeteledermatopathology
AT irinamargaritescu studyassessingthefeasibilityanddiagnosticaccuracyofrealtimeteledermatopathology
AT geoffreyjgottlieb studyassessingthefeasibilityanddiagnosticaccuracyofrealtimeteledermatopathology
_version_ 1718425652535754752