The Many-Colored Cloak
This articles argues (a) that democratic discourse has already become hegemonic among mainstream Islamist movements in Turkey and the Arab world; (b) that while this development originated in tactical calculations, it constitutes a consequential transformation in Islamist political thought; and (c)...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
International Institute of Islamic Thought
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/0c21fee13fbf49848a56ed99ada8363d |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:0c21fee13fbf49848a56ed99ada8363d |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:0c21fee13fbf49848a56ed99ada8363d2021-12-02T17:49:37ZThe Many-Colored Cloak10.35632/ajis.v27i2.3582690-37332690-3741https://doaj.org/article/0c21fee13fbf49848a56ed99ada8363d2010-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/view/358https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3733https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3741 This articles argues (a) that democratic discourse has already become hegemonic among mainstream Islamist movements in Turkey and the Arab world; (b) that while this development originated in tactical calculations, it constitutes a consequential transformation in Islamist political thought; and (c) that this transformation, in turn, raises critical questions about the interaction of religion and democracy with which contemporary Islamists have not yet grappled adequately but which were anticipated by medieval philosophers such as al-Farabi and Ibn Rushd. The argument is laid out through an analysis (based on textual sources and interviews) of key decisions on electoral participation made by Turkey’s AK Party and the Muslim Brotherhoods in Egypt, Jordan, and Syria. Particular attention is focused on these movements’ gradual embrace of three key democratic principles: pluralism, the people as the source of political authority, and the legitimacy of such procedural mechanisms as multiple parties and regular elections. Malik MuftiInternational Institute of Islamic ThoughtarticleIslamBP1-253ENAmerican Journal of Islam and Society, Vol 27, Iss 2 (2010) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Islam BP1-253 |
spellingShingle |
Islam BP1-253 Malik Mufti The Many-Colored Cloak |
description |
This articles argues (a) that democratic discourse has already become hegemonic among mainstream Islamist movements in Turkey and the Arab world; (b) that while this development originated in tactical calculations, it constitutes a consequential transformation in Islamist political thought; and (c) that this transformation, in turn, raises critical questions about the interaction of religion and democracy with which contemporary Islamists have not yet grappled adequately but which were anticipated by medieval philosophers such as al-Farabi and Ibn Rushd. The argument is laid out through an analysis (based on textual sources and interviews) of key decisions on electoral participation made by Turkey’s AK Party and the Muslim Brotherhoods in Egypt, Jordan, and Syria. Particular attention is focused on these movements’ gradual embrace of three key democratic principles: pluralism, the people as the source of political authority, and the legitimacy of such procedural mechanisms as multiple parties and regular elections.
|
format |
article |
author |
Malik Mufti |
author_facet |
Malik Mufti |
author_sort |
Malik Mufti |
title |
The Many-Colored Cloak |
title_short |
The Many-Colored Cloak |
title_full |
The Many-Colored Cloak |
title_fullStr |
The Many-Colored Cloak |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Many-Colored Cloak |
title_sort |
many-colored cloak |
publisher |
International Institute of Islamic Thought |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/0c21fee13fbf49848a56ed99ada8363d |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT malikmufti themanycoloredcloak AT malikmufti manycoloredcloak |
_version_ |
1718379391146262528 |