Applicability analysis of cyclic plasticity constitutive model for superalloy foils
Superalloy has excellent comprehensive properties and is the preferred material for high performance components of aeroengine. Due to its high yield strength and obvious springback, it is difficult to control the forming precision of superalloy component. Therefore, it is crucial to study the applic...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | ZH |
Publicado: |
Journal of Materials Engineering
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/0c5d142e7acd4d4ab6718bb96ff72b79 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:0c5d142e7acd4d4ab6718bb96ff72b79 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:0c5d142e7acd4d4ab6718bb96ff72b792021-11-12T03:01:54ZApplicability analysis of cyclic plasticity constitutive model for superalloy foils1001-438110.11868/j.issn.1001-4381.2021.000372https://doaj.org/article/0c5d142e7acd4d4ab6718bb96ff72b792021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://jme.biam.ac.cn/CN/10.11868/j.issn.1001-4381.2021.000372https://doaj.org/toc/1001-4381Superalloy has excellent comprehensive properties and is the preferred material for high performance components of aeroengine. Due to its high yield strength and obvious springback, it is difficult to control the forming precision of superalloy component. Therefore, it is crucial to study the applicability of cyclic constitutive models in the deformation simulation of superalloy foils. Based on the cyclic shearing test, the characterization effects of different cyclic plastic constitutive models on the cyclic plastic deformation response of superalloy were studied. By comparing the results of U-bending test with the simulation results of finite element software, the accuracy of springback prediction of different yield criteria combined with different cyclic plastic constitutive models was analyzed. The results show that Y-U (Yoshida-Uemori) model has the best characterizing effect on the response of cyclic plastic deformation, while A-F (Armstrong-Frederick) model and ANK (the anisotropic nonlinear kinematic) model have close characterizing effect. For the prediction accuracy of springback, the fitting accuracy of Y-U model is higher than that of isotropic model and A-F model. However, the yield criterion has little influence on the prediction accuracy of springback. The prediction deviation of Y-U model based on Hill48 yield criterion and YLD-2000 yield criterion can be controlled within 5%.WANG Yan-juLI Shen-longHE Wei-linSHA Ai-xueJIA Chong-linMENG BaoWAN MinJournal of Materials Engineeringarticlesuperalloycyclic plastic constitutive modelcyclic shearing testspringback predictiony-u modelMaterials of engineering and construction. Mechanics of materialsTA401-492ZHJournal of Materials Engineering, Vol 49, Iss 11, Pp 147-155 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
ZH |
topic |
superalloy cyclic plastic constitutive model cyclic shearing test springback prediction y-u model Materials of engineering and construction. Mechanics of materials TA401-492 |
spellingShingle |
superalloy cyclic plastic constitutive model cyclic shearing test springback prediction y-u model Materials of engineering and construction. Mechanics of materials TA401-492 WANG Yan-ju LI Shen-long HE Wei-lin SHA Ai-xue JIA Chong-lin MENG Bao WAN Min Applicability analysis of cyclic plasticity constitutive model for superalloy foils |
description |
Superalloy has excellent comprehensive properties and is the preferred material for high performance components of aeroengine. Due to its high yield strength and obvious springback, it is difficult to control the forming precision of superalloy component. Therefore, it is crucial to study the applicability of cyclic constitutive models in the deformation simulation of superalloy foils. Based on the cyclic shearing test, the characterization effects of different cyclic plastic constitutive models on the cyclic plastic deformation response of superalloy were studied. By comparing the results of U-bending test with the simulation results of finite element software, the accuracy of springback prediction of different yield criteria combined with different cyclic plastic constitutive models was analyzed. The results show that Y-U (Yoshida-Uemori) model has the best characterizing effect on the response of cyclic plastic deformation, while A-F (Armstrong-Frederick) model and ANK (the anisotropic nonlinear kinematic) model have close characterizing effect. For the prediction accuracy of springback, the fitting accuracy of Y-U model is higher than that of isotropic model and A-F model. However, the yield criterion has little influence on the prediction accuracy of springback. The prediction deviation of Y-U model based on Hill48 yield criterion and YLD-2000 yield criterion can be controlled within 5%. |
format |
article |
author |
WANG Yan-ju LI Shen-long HE Wei-lin SHA Ai-xue JIA Chong-lin MENG Bao WAN Min |
author_facet |
WANG Yan-ju LI Shen-long HE Wei-lin SHA Ai-xue JIA Chong-lin MENG Bao WAN Min |
author_sort |
WANG Yan-ju |
title |
Applicability analysis of cyclic plasticity constitutive model for superalloy foils |
title_short |
Applicability analysis of cyclic plasticity constitutive model for superalloy foils |
title_full |
Applicability analysis of cyclic plasticity constitutive model for superalloy foils |
title_fullStr |
Applicability analysis of cyclic plasticity constitutive model for superalloy foils |
title_full_unstemmed |
Applicability analysis of cyclic plasticity constitutive model for superalloy foils |
title_sort |
applicability analysis of cyclic plasticity constitutive model for superalloy foils |
publisher |
Journal of Materials Engineering |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/0c5d142e7acd4d4ab6718bb96ff72b79 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wangyanju applicabilityanalysisofcyclicplasticityconstitutivemodelforsuperalloyfoils AT lishenlong applicabilityanalysisofcyclicplasticityconstitutivemodelforsuperalloyfoils AT heweilin applicabilityanalysisofcyclicplasticityconstitutivemodelforsuperalloyfoils AT shaaixue applicabilityanalysisofcyclicplasticityconstitutivemodelforsuperalloyfoils AT jiachonglin applicabilityanalysisofcyclicplasticityconstitutivemodelforsuperalloyfoils AT mengbao applicabilityanalysisofcyclicplasticityconstitutivemodelforsuperalloyfoils AT wanmin applicabilityanalysisofcyclicplasticityconstitutivemodelforsuperalloyfoils |
_version_ |
1718431272066351104 |