Is the 4.5-F ureteroscope (Ultra-Thin) an alternative in the management of ureteric and renal pelvic stones?
Objectives: To compare the 7.5–9.5F ureteroscope (URS) with the 4.5–6.5F URS (Ultra-Thin) in terms of success and complication rates in adult patients with ureteric and renal pelvic stones. Patients and methods: In all, 41 patients treated with 7.5–9.5F semi-rigid URS (Group 1) and 33 patients treat...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Hakkı Uzun, Nezih Akça |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/0c6fcbf1809a4a668d1fb4c1ba2d20b6 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Bilateral same-session flexible ureterorenoscopy for renal and/or ureteric stone disease treatment
por: Ersan Arda, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
[30] Outcomes of emergency vs elective ureteroscopy for a single ureteric stone
por: Majd Alkabbani, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Commentary in response to BMC Urology publication entitled “Infection-related hospitalization following ureteroscopic stone treatment: results from a surgical collaborative”
por: Wesley A. Mayer
Publicado: (2021) -
[18] Fluoroscopy free JJ stent placement through ureteroscope working channel after uncomplicated ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy: A novel technique
por: Hamdy Aboutaleb, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Efficacy of silodosin on the outcome of semi-rigid ureteroscopy for the management of large distal ureteric stones: blinded randomised trial
por: Ahmed Mohey, et al.
Publicado: (2018)