Greenland and Denmark: Arctic Secessionism in a Global Powerplay

Greenland, the biggest island in the world inhabited predominantly by Inuits, was a Danish colony before 1953 and has since then been a part of the Danish realm with a gradually increasing autonomy. Some 2/3 of its population favor a complete secession, but the heavy dependence upon Danish budget su...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: A. A. Krivorotov
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
RU
Publicado: Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”) 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0c7dc437bf134b558ef1258301ef8fcb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0c7dc437bf134b558ef1258301ef8fcb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0c7dc437bf134b558ef1258301ef8fcb2021-11-07T14:45:05ZGreenland and Denmark: Arctic Secessionism in a Global Powerplay2542-02402587-932410.23932/2542-0240-2021-14-1-6https://doaj.org/article/0c7dc437bf134b558ef1258301ef8fcb2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/721https://doaj.org/toc/2542-0240https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9324Greenland, the biggest island in the world inhabited predominantly by Inuits, was a Danish colony before 1953 and has since then been a part of the Danish realm with a gradually increasing autonomy. Some 2/3 of its population favor a complete secession, but the heavy dependence upon Danish budget subsidies is the main challenge. The Chinese government and companies have since 2005 maintained a close dialogue with Greenland as an entry point to the Arctic and a rich base of natural resources (including rare earth elements), though there has not been major investments yet. The U.S. have lately tried to halt this cooperation for the reasons of foreign, security and resource policy, and to put Greenland under a tighter American control. President Trump’s purchase offer in 2019 was the most publicized initiative. Denmark, despite its close alliance with the United States, is worried by either American or Chinese involvement and tries to become a good patron for Greenland to prevent its secession. Meanwhile, the Greenlandic authorities confirm their political will to struggle for a complete independence from Denmark. The article suggests three medium-term scenarios, with Greenland remaining in an gradually looser union with Denmark, moving into the U.S. domain and acquiring a full statehood with a subsequent competition of great powers. Whatever the outcome, Russia shall monitor the development closely and play an active role in the Arctic, not taking a part in the US-China rivalry.A. A. KrivorotovАссоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)articlegreenlandself-rulesecessionismdenmarkchina-us confrontationarcticrare earth elementsscenariosrussiaInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUКонтуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 118-134 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
RU
topic greenland
self-rule
secessionism
denmark
china-us confrontation
arctic
rare earth elements
scenarios
russia
International relations
JZ2-6530
spellingShingle greenland
self-rule
secessionism
denmark
china-us confrontation
arctic
rare earth elements
scenarios
russia
International relations
JZ2-6530
A. A. Krivorotov
Greenland and Denmark: Arctic Secessionism in a Global Powerplay
description Greenland, the biggest island in the world inhabited predominantly by Inuits, was a Danish colony before 1953 and has since then been a part of the Danish realm with a gradually increasing autonomy. Some 2/3 of its population favor a complete secession, but the heavy dependence upon Danish budget subsidies is the main challenge. The Chinese government and companies have since 2005 maintained a close dialogue with Greenland as an entry point to the Arctic and a rich base of natural resources (including rare earth elements), though there has not been major investments yet. The U.S. have lately tried to halt this cooperation for the reasons of foreign, security and resource policy, and to put Greenland under a tighter American control. President Trump’s purchase offer in 2019 was the most publicized initiative. Denmark, despite its close alliance with the United States, is worried by either American or Chinese involvement and tries to become a good patron for Greenland to prevent its secession. Meanwhile, the Greenlandic authorities confirm their political will to struggle for a complete independence from Denmark. The article suggests three medium-term scenarios, with Greenland remaining in an gradually looser union with Denmark, moving into the U.S. domain and acquiring a full statehood with a subsequent competition of great powers. Whatever the outcome, Russia shall monitor the development closely and play an active role in the Arctic, not taking a part in the US-China rivalry.
format article
author A. A. Krivorotov
author_facet A. A. Krivorotov
author_sort A. A. Krivorotov
title Greenland and Denmark: Arctic Secessionism in a Global Powerplay
title_short Greenland and Denmark: Arctic Secessionism in a Global Powerplay
title_full Greenland and Denmark: Arctic Secessionism in a Global Powerplay
title_fullStr Greenland and Denmark: Arctic Secessionism in a Global Powerplay
title_full_unstemmed Greenland and Denmark: Arctic Secessionism in a Global Powerplay
title_sort greenland and denmark: arctic secessionism in a global powerplay
publisher Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/0c7dc437bf134b558ef1258301ef8fcb
work_keys_str_mv AT aakrivorotov greenlandanddenmarkarcticsecessionisminaglobalpowerplay
_version_ 1718443332554719232