The Influence of Missing Data on Disabilities in Patients Treated with High-Dose Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Tipping Point Sensitivity Analysis

New waveforms have changed the field of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) to optimize therapy outcomes, among which is High-Dose SCS (HD-SCS). Missing observations are often encountered when conducting clinical trials in this field. In this study, different approaches with varying assumptions were const...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lisa Goudman, Geert Molenberghs, Rui V. Duarte, Maarten Moens
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0c977a707b67444da8755a828d9d4020
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0c977a707b67444da8755a828d9d4020
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0c977a707b67444da8755a828d9d40202021-11-11T17:32:51ZThe Influence of Missing Data on Disabilities in Patients Treated with High-Dose Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Tipping Point Sensitivity Analysis10.3390/jcm102148972077-0383https://doaj.org/article/0c977a707b67444da8755a828d9d40202021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/21/4897https://doaj.org/toc/2077-0383New waveforms have changed the field of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) to optimize therapy outcomes, among which is High-Dose SCS (HD-SCS). Missing observations are often encountered when conducting clinical trials in this field. In this study, different approaches with varying assumptions were constructed to evaluate how conclusions may be influenced by these assumptions. The aim is to perform a tipping point sensitivity analysis to evaluate the influence of missing data on the overall conclusion regarding the effectiveness of HD-SCS on disability. Data from the Discover study were used, in which 185 patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome were included. Disability was evaluated before SCS and after 1, 3 and 12 months of HD-SCS. During the second, third and fourth visit, data from 130, 114 and 90 patients were available, respectively. HD-SCS resulted in a significant decrease in disability scores based on the analysis of observed data and with multiple imputations. The tipping point sensitivity analysis revealed that the shift parameter was 17. Thus, the conclusion concerning the time effect under a “missing at random” mechanism is robust when the shift parameter for the disability score is 17. From a clinical point of view, a shift of 17 points on disability is not very plausible. Therefore we tend to consider the conclusions drawn under “missing at random” as being robust.Lisa GoudmanGeert MolenberghsRui V. DuarteMaarten MoensMDPI AGarticlemissing data mechanismssensitivity analysismultiple imputationsneuromodulationMedicineRENJournal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 10, Iss 4897, p 4897 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic missing data mechanisms
sensitivity analysis
multiple imputations
neuromodulation
Medicine
R
spellingShingle missing data mechanisms
sensitivity analysis
multiple imputations
neuromodulation
Medicine
R
Lisa Goudman
Geert Molenberghs
Rui V. Duarte
Maarten Moens
The Influence of Missing Data on Disabilities in Patients Treated with High-Dose Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Tipping Point Sensitivity Analysis
description New waveforms have changed the field of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) to optimize therapy outcomes, among which is High-Dose SCS (HD-SCS). Missing observations are often encountered when conducting clinical trials in this field. In this study, different approaches with varying assumptions were constructed to evaluate how conclusions may be influenced by these assumptions. The aim is to perform a tipping point sensitivity analysis to evaluate the influence of missing data on the overall conclusion regarding the effectiveness of HD-SCS on disability. Data from the Discover study were used, in which 185 patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome were included. Disability was evaluated before SCS and after 1, 3 and 12 months of HD-SCS. During the second, third and fourth visit, data from 130, 114 and 90 patients were available, respectively. HD-SCS resulted in a significant decrease in disability scores based on the analysis of observed data and with multiple imputations. The tipping point sensitivity analysis revealed that the shift parameter was 17. Thus, the conclusion concerning the time effect under a “missing at random” mechanism is robust when the shift parameter for the disability score is 17. From a clinical point of view, a shift of 17 points on disability is not very plausible. Therefore we tend to consider the conclusions drawn under “missing at random” as being robust.
format article
author Lisa Goudman
Geert Molenberghs
Rui V. Duarte
Maarten Moens
author_facet Lisa Goudman
Geert Molenberghs
Rui V. Duarte
Maarten Moens
author_sort Lisa Goudman
title The Influence of Missing Data on Disabilities in Patients Treated with High-Dose Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Tipping Point Sensitivity Analysis
title_short The Influence of Missing Data on Disabilities in Patients Treated with High-Dose Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Tipping Point Sensitivity Analysis
title_full The Influence of Missing Data on Disabilities in Patients Treated with High-Dose Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Tipping Point Sensitivity Analysis
title_fullStr The Influence of Missing Data on Disabilities in Patients Treated with High-Dose Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Tipping Point Sensitivity Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Missing Data on Disabilities in Patients Treated with High-Dose Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Tipping Point Sensitivity Analysis
title_sort influence of missing data on disabilities in patients treated with high-dose spinal cord stimulation: a tipping point sensitivity analysis
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/0c977a707b67444da8755a828d9d4020
work_keys_str_mv AT lisagoudman theinfluenceofmissingdataondisabilitiesinpatientstreatedwithhighdosespinalcordstimulationatippingpointsensitivityanalysis
AT geertmolenberghs theinfluenceofmissingdataondisabilitiesinpatientstreatedwithhighdosespinalcordstimulationatippingpointsensitivityanalysis
AT ruivduarte theinfluenceofmissingdataondisabilitiesinpatientstreatedwithhighdosespinalcordstimulationatippingpointsensitivityanalysis
AT maartenmoens theinfluenceofmissingdataondisabilitiesinpatientstreatedwithhighdosespinalcordstimulationatippingpointsensitivityanalysis
AT lisagoudman influenceofmissingdataondisabilitiesinpatientstreatedwithhighdosespinalcordstimulationatippingpointsensitivityanalysis
AT geertmolenberghs influenceofmissingdataondisabilitiesinpatientstreatedwithhighdosespinalcordstimulationatippingpointsensitivityanalysis
AT ruivduarte influenceofmissingdataondisabilitiesinpatientstreatedwithhighdosespinalcordstimulationatippingpointsensitivityanalysis
AT maartenmoens influenceofmissingdataondisabilitiesinpatientstreatedwithhighdosespinalcordstimulationatippingpointsensitivityanalysis
_version_ 1718432043694555136