Identification of germline cancer predisposition variants during clinical ctDNA testing

Abstract Next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a non-invasive method to guide therapy selection for cancer patients. ctDNA variant allele frequency (VAF) is commonly reported and may aid in discerning whether a variant is germline or somatic. We report on the fidelity of VAF...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leigh Anne Stout, Nawal Kassem, Cynthia Hunter, Santosh Philips, Milan Radovich, Bryan P. Schneider
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0cc58bca3e134f00802d49538b3886c5
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0cc58bca3e134f00802d49538b3886c5
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0cc58bca3e134f00802d49538b3886c52021-12-02T16:10:50ZIdentification of germline cancer predisposition variants during clinical ctDNA testing10.1038/s41598-021-93084-02045-2322https://doaj.org/article/0cc58bca3e134f00802d49538b3886c52021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93084-0https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a non-invasive method to guide therapy selection for cancer patients. ctDNA variant allele frequency (VAF) is commonly reported and may aid in discerning whether a variant is germline or somatic. We report on the fidelity of VAF in ctDNA as a predictor for germline variant carriage. Two patient cohorts were studied. Cohort 1 included patients with known germline variants. Cohort 2 included patients with any variant detected by the ctDNA assay with VAF of 40–60%. In cohort 1, 36 of 91 (40%) known germline variants were identified through ctDNA analysis with a VAF of 39–87.6%. In cohort 2, 111 of 160 (69%) variants identified by ctDNA analysis with a VAF between 40 and 60% were found to be germline. Therefore, variants with a VAF between 40 and 60% should induce suspicion for germline status but should not be used as a replacement for germline testing.Leigh Anne StoutNawal KassemCynthia HunterSantosh PhilipsMilan RadovichBryan P. SchneiderNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Leigh Anne Stout
Nawal Kassem
Cynthia Hunter
Santosh Philips
Milan Radovich
Bryan P. Schneider
Identification of germline cancer predisposition variants during clinical ctDNA testing
description Abstract Next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a non-invasive method to guide therapy selection for cancer patients. ctDNA variant allele frequency (VAF) is commonly reported and may aid in discerning whether a variant is germline or somatic. We report on the fidelity of VAF in ctDNA as a predictor for germline variant carriage. Two patient cohorts were studied. Cohort 1 included patients with known germline variants. Cohort 2 included patients with any variant detected by the ctDNA assay with VAF of 40–60%. In cohort 1, 36 of 91 (40%) known germline variants were identified through ctDNA analysis with a VAF of 39–87.6%. In cohort 2, 111 of 160 (69%) variants identified by ctDNA analysis with a VAF between 40 and 60% were found to be germline. Therefore, variants with a VAF between 40 and 60% should induce suspicion for germline status but should not be used as a replacement for germline testing.
format article
author Leigh Anne Stout
Nawal Kassem
Cynthia Hunter
Santosh Philips
Milan Radovich
Bryan P. Schneider
author_facet Leigh Anne Stout
Nawal Kassem
Cynthia Hunter
Santosh Philips
Milan Radovich
Bryan P. Schneider
author_sort Leigh Anne Stout
title Identification of germline cancer predisposition variants during clinical ctDNA testing
title_short Identification of germline cancer predisposition variants during clinical ctDNA testing
title_full Identification of germline cancer predisposition variants during clinical ctDNA testing
title_fullStr Identification of germline cancer predisposition variants during clinical ctDNA testing
title_full_unstemmed Identification of germline cancer predisposition variants during clinical ctDNA testing
title_sort identification of germline cancer predisposition variants during clinical ctdna testing
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/0cc58bca3e134f00802d49538b3886c5
work_keys_str_mv AT leighannestout identificationofgermlinecancerpredispositionvariantsduringclinicalctdnatesting
AT nawalkassem identificationofgermlinecancerpredispositionvariantsduringclinicalctdnatesting
AT cynthiahunter identificationofgermlinecancerpredispositionvariantsduringclinicalctdnatesting
AT santoshphilips identificationofgermlinecancerpredispositionvariantsduringclinicalctdnatesting
AT milanradovich identificationofgermlinecancerpredispositionvariantsduringclinicalctdnatesting
AT bryanpschneider identificationofgermlinecancerpredispositionvariantsduringclinicalctdnatesting
_version_ 1718384392359903232