Patient and provider experiences with relationship, information, and management continuity

From 2003 to 2014, the Health Quality Council of Alberta (HQCA) monitored patient experiences with healthcare services through a biennial Satisfaction and Experience with Healthcare Services (SEHCS) survey. The findings consistently showed a direct link between coordination of care, an aspect of con...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeanette Jackson, Gail MacKean, Tim Cooke, Markus Lahtinen
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: The Beryl Institute 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0ccb42e297154ae58dfd49d29b91e314
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0ccb42e297154ae58dfd49d29b91e314
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0ccb42e297154ae58dfd49d29b91e3142021-11-15T04:22:14ZPatient and provider experiences with relationship, information, and management continuity2372-0247https://doaj.org/article/0ccb42e297154ae58dfd49d29b91e3142017-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://pxjournal.org/journal/vol4/iss3/8https://doaj.org/toc/2372-0247From 2003 to 2014, the Health Quality Council of Alberta (HQCA) monitored patient experiences with healthcare services through a biennial Satisfaction and Experience with Healthcare Services (SEHCS) survey. The findings consistently showed a direct link between coordination of care, an aspect of continuity of care, and healthcare outcomes. Specifically, it showed that better coordination is linked to positive outcomes; the reverse is also true. Given the critical role continuity of care plays in the healthcare system, the HQCA conducted in-depth interviews, interactive feedback sessions and focus groups with patients and providers to explore factors that influence both seamless and fragmented patient journeys. Continuity of care refers to “the degree to which a series of discrete healthcare events is experienced as coherent and connected and consistent with the patient’s healthcare needs and personal context”. Reviews of international literature have identified three major subtypes of continuity across healthcare settings: relationship, information, and management continuity. This study showed that from the patient perspective, relationship continuity is most valued and is foundational for experiencing information and management continuity. A trusting, patient-centred, and respectful relationship with a primary healthcare provider is central to this. From the provider perspective, information continuity is most important. Primary care providers get frustrated if information is withheld or delayed, and if other providers change treatment plans or medications. Patients highly value timely access to their own information. They also value having enough time during an appointment with a family doctor who listens and communicates effectively. Both patients and providers value and benefit from management continuity, which was described by many as a partnership or shared responsibility for managing and coordinating healthcare services. Future conversations about health system design should focus on how all providers and services can work together, and engage patients, to co-design a system that is built around patient-centred relationships.Jeanette JacksonGail MacKeanTim CookeMarkus LahtinenThe Beryl Institutearticlecontinuity of carepatient and provider experienceprimary healthcareteamworkcommunicationquality improvementMedicine (General)R5-920Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENPatient Experience Journal (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic continuity of care
patient and provider experience
primary healthcare
teamwork
communication
quality improvement
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle continuity of care
patient and provider experience
primary healthcare
teamwork
communication
quality improvement
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Jeanette Jackson
Gail MacKean
Tim Cooke
Markus Lahtinen
Patient and provider experiences with relationship, information, and management continuity
description From 2003 to 2014, the Health Quality Council of Alberta (HQCA) monitored patient experiences with healthcare services through a biennial Satisfaction and Experience with Healthcare Services (SEHCS) survey. The findings consistently showed a direct link between coordination of care, an aspect of continuity of care, and healthcare outcomes. Specifically, it showed that better coordination is linked to positive outcomes; the reverse is also true. Given the critical role continuity of care plays in the healthcare system, the HQCA conducted in-depth interviews, interactive feedback sessions and focus groups with patients and providers to explore factors that influence both seamless and fragmented patient journeys. Continuity of care refers to “the degree to which a series of discrete healthcare events is experienced as coherent and connected and consistent with the patient’s healthcare needs and personal context”. Reviews of international literature have identified three major subtypes of continuity across healthcare settings: relationship, information, and management continuity. This study showed that from the patient perspective, relationship continuity is most valued and is foundational for experiencing information and management continuity. A trusting, patient-centred, and respectful relationship with a primary healthcare provider is central to this. From the provider perspective, information continuity is most important. Primary care providers get frustrated if information is withheld or delayed, and if other providers change treatment plans or medications. Patients highly value timely access to their own information. They also value having enough time during an appointment with a family doctor who listens and communicates effectively. Both patients and providers value and benefit from management continuity, which was described by many as a partnership or shared responsibility for managing and coordinating healthcare services. Future conversations about health system design should focus on how all providers and services can work together, and engage patients, to co-design a system that is built around patient-centred relationships.
format article
author Jeanette Jackson
Gail MacKean
Tim Cooke
Markus Lahtinen
author_facet Jeanette Jackson
Gail MacKean
Tim Cooke
Markus Lahtinen
author_sort Jeanette Jackson
title Patient and provider experiences with relationship, information, and management continuity
title_short Patient and provider experiences with relationship, information, and management continuity
title_full Patient and provider experiences with relationship, information, and management continuity
title_fullStr Patient and provider experiences with relationship, information, and management continuity
title_full_unstemmed Patient and provider experiences with relationship, information, and management continuity
title_sort patient and provider experiences with relationship, information, and management continuity
publisher The Beryl Institute
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/0ccb42e297154ae58dfd49d29b91e314
work_keys_str_mv AT jeanettejackson patientandproviderexperienceswithrelationshipinformationandmanagementcontinuity
AT gailmackean patientandproviderexperienceswithrelationshipinformationandmanagementcontinuity
AT timcooke patientandproviderexperienceswithrelationshipinformationandmanagementcontinuity
AT markuslahtinen patientandproviderexperienceswithrelationshipinformationandmanagementcontinuity
_version_ 1718428847853010944