Comparison between surgery and thermal ablation for adrenal metastases: a retrospective study

Purpose To retrospectively compare the efficacy and safety of surgical resection (SR) and thermal ablation for the treatment of adrenal metastases. Methods From January 2008 to December 2018, 133 patients with adrenal metastases who underwent SR (n = 76) or thermal ablation (n = 57) were enrolled. T...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin Xie, Han Qi, Fei Cao, Lujun Shen, Shuanggang Chen, Ying Wu, Tao Huang, Ze Song, Weijun Fan
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0d0695cb7b1b4bfcab6e6588905058fa
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0d0695cb7b1b4bfcab6e6588905058fa
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0d0695cb7b1b4bfcab6e6588905058fa2021-11-04T15:00:41ZComparison between surgery and thermal ablation for adrenal metastases: a retrospective study0265-67361464-515710.1080/02656736.2021.1993356https://doaj.org/article/0d0695cb7b1b4bfcab6e6588905058fa2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2021.1993356https://doaj.org/toc/0265-6736https://doaj.org/toc/1464-5157Purpose To retrospectively compare the efficacy and safety of surgical resection (SR) and thermal ablation for the treatment of adrenal metastases. Methods From January 2008 to December 2018, 133 patients with adrenal metastases who underwent SR (n = 76) or thermal ablation (n = 57) were enrolled. The mean tumor size was 58.00 ± 10.65 mm (22-80 mm) in the SR group and 58.03 ± 12.76 mm (34–89 mm) in the thermal ablation group. Local progression-free survival (LPFS) and safety were compared between the two groups using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the prognostic factors of LPFS. Complications, hospitalization days, and blood loss were also assessed. Results The median follow-up was 29.0 months (range, 20.4–37.6 months). No treatment-related mortality was observed. The 1-, 3- and 5-year LPFS rates were 74.0%, 62.8%, and 31.4% in the SR group and 72.8%, 68.7%, and 51.5% in the ablation group, with the median LPFS of 41.5 months (95% CI: 9.3–23.4 months) vs. 47.9 months (95% CI 20.6–75.8 months), respectively (p = 0.784). Tumor size ≥3 cm was the only significant risk factor for LPFS (p = 0.031). The ablation group was superior to the SR group with a lower major complication rate (4.1% vs. 14.5%, p = 0.03), less blood loss (1 ml vs. 100 ml, p < 0.001), and a shorter hospital stay (2 d vs. 6 d, p < 0.001). Conclusion Thermal ablation provided a similar LPFS and less comorbidities than SR, indicating that it is an effective and safe treatment for adrenal metastases.Lin XieHan QiFei CaoLujun ShenShuanggang ChenYing WuTao HuangZe SongWeijun FanTaylor & Francis Grouparticleadrenal metastasessurgical resectionthermal ablationcomplicationslocal progression-free survivalMedical technologyR855-855.5ENInternational Journal of Hyperthermia, Vol 38, Iss 1, Pp 1541-1547 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic adrenal metastases
surgical resection
thermal ablation
complications
local progression-free survival
Medical technology
R855-855.5
spellingShingle adrenal metastases
surgical resection
thermal ablation
complications
local progression-free survival
Medical technology
R855-855.5
Lin Xie
Han Qi
Fei Cao
Lujun Shen
Shuanggang Chen
Ying Wu
Tao Huang
Ze Song
Weijun Fan
Comparison between surgery and thermal ablation for adrenal metastases: a retrospective study
description Purpose To retrospectively compare the efficacy and safety of surgical resection (SR) and thermal ablation for the treatment of adrenal metastases. Methods From January 2008 to December 2018, 133 patients with adrenal metastases who underwent SR (n = 76) or thermal ablation (n = 57) were enrolled. The mean tumor size was 58.00 ± 10.65 mm (22-80 mm) in the SR group and 58.03 ± 12.76 mm (34–89 mm) in the thermal ablation group. Local progression-free survival (LPFS) and safety were compared between the two groups using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the prognostic factors of LPFS. Complications, hospitalization days, and blood loss were also assessed. Results The median follow-up was 29.0 months (range, 20.4–37.6 months). No treatment-related mortality was observed. The 1-, 3- and 5-year LPFS rates were 74.0%, 62.8%, and 31.4% in the SR group and 72.8%, 68.7%, and 51.5% in the ablation group, with the median LPFS of 41.5 months (95% CI: 9.3–23.4 months) vs. 47.9 months (95% CI 20.6–75.8 months), respectively (p = 0.784). Tumor size ≥3 cm was the only significant risk factor for LPFS (p = 0.031). The ablation group was superior to the SR group with a lower major complication rate (4.1% vs. 14.5%, p = 0.03), less blood loss (1 ml vs. 100 ml, p < 0.001), and a shorter hospital stay (2 d vs. 6 d, p < 0.001). Conclusion Thermal ablation provided a similar LPFS and less comorbidities than SR, indicating that it is an effective and safe treatment for adrenal metastases.
format article
author Lin Xie
Han Qi
Fei Cao
Lujun Shen
Shuanggang Chen
Ying Wu
Tao Huang
Ze Song
Weijun Fan
author_facet Lin Xie
Han Qi
Fei Cao
Lujun Shen
Shuanggang Chen
Ying Wu
Tao Huang
Ze Song
Weijun Fan
author_sort Lin Xie
title Comparison between surgery and thermal ablation for adrenal metastases: a retrospective study
title_short Comparison between surgery and thermal ablation for adrenal metastases: a retrospective study
title_full Comparison between surgery and thermal ablation for adrenal metastases: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Comparison between surgery and thermal ablation for adrenal metastases: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between surgery and thermal ablation for adrenal metastases: a retrospective study
title_sort comparison between surgery and thermal ablation for adrenal metastases: a retrospective study
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/0d0695cb7b1b4bfcab6e6588905058fa
work_keys_str_mv AT linxie comparisonbetweensurgeryandthermalablationforadrenalmetastasesaretrospectivestudy
AT hanqi comparisonbetweensurgeryandthermalablationforadrenalmetastasesaretrospectivestudy
AT feicao comparisonbetweensurgeryandthermalablationforadrenalmetastasesaretrospectivestudy
AT lujunshen comparisonbetweensurgeryandthermalablationforadrenalmetastasesaretrospectivestudy
AT shuanggangchen comparisonbetweensurgeryandthermalablationforadrenalmetastasesaretrospectivestudy
AT yingwu comparisonbetweensurgeryandthermalablationforadrenalmetastasesaretrospectivestudy
AT taohuang comparisonbetweensurgeryandthermalablationforadrenalmetastasesaretrospectivestudy
AT zesong comparisonbetweensurgeryandthermalablationforadrenalmetastasesaretrospectivestudy
AT weijunfan comparisonbetweensurgeryandthermalablationforadrenalmetastasesaretrospectivestudy
_version_ 1718444755068649472