Soft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study

This study aimed to evaluate the airborne-particle abrasion surface treatment effects on the tensile bond strength (TBS) between resilient denture liner and CAD/CAM or conventional heat polymerized poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) acrylic denture resins. A total of 48 dumbbell-shaped specimens (70...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sara Mohammad Al Taweel, Hanan Nejer Al-Otaibi, Nawaf Labban, Afnan AlFouzan, Huda Al Shehri
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
T
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0d281d44fc7e4302acda865cd2388030
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0d281d44fc7e4302acda865cd2388030
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0d281d44fc7e4302acda865cd23880302021-11-11T18:08:57ZSoft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study10.3390/ma142166141996-1944https://doaj.org/article/0d281d44fc7e4302acda865cd23880302021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/21/6614https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1944This study aimed to evaluate the airborne-particle abrasion surface treatment effects on the tensile bond strength (TBS) between resilient denture liner and CAD/CAM or conventional heat polymerized poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) acrylic denture resins. A total of 48 dumbbell-shaped specimens (70 mm in total length, and 12 mm and 7 mm in diameter at the thickest and thinnest section, respectively) were prepared from CAD/CAM and conventional acrylic resins. Before relining with denture liner, 12 specimens from each material were surface-treated by 110 µm Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> airborne-particle abrasion, and the remaining specimens served as control (no treatment). Following relining, all the specimens were aged by thermal cycling (1000 cycles, 5–55 °C). The TBS of denture liner to acrylic denture resins was tested in a universal testing apparatus at a 5 mm/min crosshead speed. The debonded surfaces were visually examined for the failure modes. ANOVA and multiple comparisons posthoc analysis tests were applied to determine the significant difference in TBS between the study groups (α = 0.05). A significant difference in TBS was observed between the control and surface treated groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001) for both acrylic resins materials. However, there was no statistically significant difference in bond strength between the acrylic resins materials (<i>p</i> = 0.739). Surface treatment with airborne-particle abrasion demonstrated increased TBS of the soft denture liners to acrylic resins. The TBS of conventional and CAD/CAM acrylic resins to soft denture liners were not considerably different.Sara Mohammad Al TaweelHanan Nejer Al-OtaibiNawaf LabbanAfnan AlFouzanHuda Al ShehriMDPI AGarticleacrylic resinsair-particle abrasionCAD/CAM technologiessoft linerstensile bond strengthTechnologyTElectrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineeringTK1-9971Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040MicroscopyQH201-278.5Descriptive and experimental mechanicsQC120-168.85ENMaterials, Vol 14, Iss 6614, p 6614 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic acrylic resins
air-particle abrasion
CAD/CAM technologies
soft liners
tensile bond strength
Technology
T
Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering
TK1-9971
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Microscopy
QH201-278.5
Descriptive and experimental mechanics
QC120-168.85
spellingShingle acrylic resins
air-particle abrasion
CAD/CAM technologies
soft liners
tensile bond strength
Technology
T
Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering
TK1-9971
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Microscopy
QH201-278.5
Descriptive and experimental mechanics
QC120-168.85
Sara Mohammad Al Taweel
Hanan Nejer Al-Otaibi
Nawaf Labban
Afnan AlFouzan
Huda Al Shehri
Soft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study
description This study aimed to evaluate the airborne-particle abrasion surface treatment effects on the tensile bond strength (TBS) between resilient denture liner and CAD/CAM or conventional heat polymerized poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) acrylic denture resins. A total of 48 dumbbell-shaped specimens (70 mm in total length, and 12 mm and 7 mm in diameter at the thickest and thinnest section, respectively) were prepared from CAD/CAM and conventional acrylic resins. Before relining with denture liner, 12 specimens from each material were surface-treated by 110 µm Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> airborne-particle abrasion, and the remaining specimens served as control (no treatment). Following relining, all the specimens were aged by thermal cycling (1000 cycles, 5–55 °C). The TBS of denture liner to acrylic denture resins was tested in a universal testing apparatus at a 5 mm/min crosshead speed. The debonded surfaces were visually examined for the failure modes. ANOVA and multiple comparisons posthoc analysis tests were applied to determine the significant difference in TBS between the study groups (α = 0.05). A significant difference in TBS was observed between the control and surface treated groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001) for both acrylic resins materials. However, there was no statistically significant difference in bond strength between the acrylic resins materials (<i>p</i> = 0.739). Surface treatment with airborne-particle abrasion demonstrated increased TBS of the soft denture liners to acrylic resins. The TBS of conventional and CAD/CAM acrylic resins to soft denture liners were not considerably different.
format article
author Sara Mohammad Al Taweel
Hanan Nejer Al-Otaibi
Nawaf Labban
Afnan AlFouzan
Huda Al Shehri
author_facet Sara Mohammad Al Taweel
Hanan Nejer Al-Otaibi
Nawaf Labban
Afnan AlFouzan
Huda Al Shehri
author_sort Sara Mohammad Al Taweel
title Soft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study
title_short Soft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study
title_full Soft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study
title_fullStr Soft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Soft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study
title_sort soft denture liner adhesion to conventional and cad/cam processed poly(methyl methacrylate) acrylic denture resins-an in-vitro study
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/0d281d44fc7e4302acda865cd2388030
work_keys_str_mv AT saramohammadaltaweel softdenturelineradhesiontoconventionalandcadcamprocessedpolymethylmethacrylateacrylicdentureresinsaninvitrostudy
AT hanannejeralotaibi softdenturelineradhesiontoconventionalandcadcamprocessedpolymethylmethacrylateacrylicdentureresinsaninvitrostudy
AT nawaflabban softdenturelineradhesiontoconventionalandcadcamprocessedpolymethylmethacrylateacrylicdentureresinsaninvitrostudy
AT afnanalfouzan softdenturelineradhesiontoconventionalandcadcamprocessedpolymethylmethacrylateacrylicdentureresinsaninvitrostudy
AT hudaalshehri softdenturelineradhesiontoconventionalandcadcamprocessedpolymethylmethacrylateacrylicdentureresinsaninvitrostudy
_version_ 1718431923904184320