Soft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study
This study aimed to evaluate the airborne-particle abrasion surface treatment effects on the tensile bond strength (TBS) between resilient denture liner and CAD/CAM or conventional heat polymerized poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) acrylic denture resins. A total of 48 dumbbell-shaped specimens (70...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/0d281d44fc7e4302acda865cd2388030 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:0d281d44fc7e4302acda865cd2388030 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:0d281d44fc7e4302acda865cd23880302021-11-11T18:08:57ZSoft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study10.3390/ma142166141996-1944https://doaj.org/article/0d281d44fc7e4302acda865cd23880302021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/21/6614https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1944This study aimed to evaluate the airborne-particle abrasion surface treatment effects on the tensile bond strength (TBS) between resilient denture liner and CAD/CAM or conventional heat polymerized poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) acrylic denture resins. A total of 48 dumbbell-shaped specimens (70 mm in total length, and 12 mm and 7 mm in diameter at the thickest and thinnest section, respectively) were prepared from CAD/CAM and conventional acrylic resins. Before relining with denture liner, 12 specimens from each material were surface-treated by 110 µm Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> airborne-particle abrasion, and the remaining specimens served as control (no treatment). Following relining, all the specimens were aged by thermal cycling (1000 cycles, 5–55 °C). The TBS of denture liner to acrylic denture resins was tested in a universal testing apparatus at a 5 mm/min crosshead speed. The debonded surfaces were visually examined for the failure modes. ANOVA and multiple comparisons posthoc analysis tests were applied to determine the significant difference in TBS between the study groups (α = 0.05). A significant difference in TBS was observed between the control and surface treated groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001) for both acrylic resins materials. However, there was no statistically significant difference in bond strength between the acrylic resins materials (<i>p</i> = 0.739). Surface treatment with airborne-particle abrasion demonstrated increased TBS of the soft denture liners to acrylic resins. The TBS of conventional and CAD/CAM acrylic resins to soft denture liners were not considerably different.Sara Mohammad Al TaweelHanan Nejer Al-OtaibiNawaf LabbanAfnan AlFouzanHuda Al ShehriMDPI AGarticleacrylic resinsair-particle abrasionCAD/CAM technologiessoft linerstensile bond strengthTechnologyTElectrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineeringTK1-9971Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040MicroscopyQH201-278.5Descriptive and experimental mechanicsQC120-168.85ENMaterials, Vol 14, Iss 6614, p 6614 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
acrylic resins air-particle abrasion CAD/CAM technologies soft liners tensile bond strength Technology T Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering TK1-9971 Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Microscopy QH201-278.5 Descriptive and experimental mechanics QC120-168.85 |
spellingShingle |
acrylic resins air-particle abrasion CAD/CAM technologies soft liners tensile bond strength Technology T Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering TK1-9971 Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Microscopy QH201-278.5 Descriptive and experimental mechanics QC120-168.85 Sara Mohammad Al Taweel Hanan Nejer Al-Otaibi Nawaf Labban Afnan AlFouzan Huda Al Shehri Soft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study |
description |
This study aimed to evaluate the airborne-particle abrasion surface treatment effects on the tensile bond strength (TBS) between resilient denture liner and CAD/CAM or conventional heat polymerized poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) acrylic denture resins. A total of 48 dumbbell-shaped specimens (70 mm in total length, and 12 mm and 7 mm in diameter at the thickest and thinnest section, respectively) were prepared from CAD/CAM and conventional acrylic resins. Before relining with denture liner, 12 specimens from each material were surface-treated by 110 µm Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> airborne-particle abrasion, and the remaining specimens served as control (no treatment). Following relining, all the specimens were aged by thermal cycling (1000 cycles, 5–55 °C). The TBS of denture liner to acrylic denture resins was tested in a universal testing apparatus at a 5 mm/min crosshead speed. The debonded surfaces were visually examined for the failure modes. ANOVA and multiple comparisons posthoc analysis tests were applied to determine the significant difference in TBS between the study groups (α = 0.05). A significant difference in TBS was observed between the control and surface treated groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001) for both acrylic resins materials. However, there was no statistically significant difference in bond strength between the acrylic resins materials (<i>p</i> = 0.739). Surface treatment with airborne-particle abrasion demonstrated increased TBS of the soft denture liners to acrylic resins. The TBS of conventional and CAD/CAM acrylic resins to soft denture liners were not considerably different. |
format |
article |
author |
Sara Mohammad Al Taweel Hanan Nejer Al-Otaibi Nawaf Labban Afnan AlFouzan Huda Al Shehri |
author_facet |
Sara Mohammad Al Taweel Hanan Nejer Al-Otaibi Nawaf Labban Afnan AlFouzan Huda Al Shehri |
author_sort |
Sara Mohammad Al Taweel |
title |
Soft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study |
title_short |
Soft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study |
title_full |
Soft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study |
title_fullStr |
Soft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Soft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study |
title_sort |
soft denture liner adhesion to conventional and cad/cam processed poly(methyl methacrylate) acrylic denture resins-an in-vitro study |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/0d281d44fc7e4302acda865cd2388030 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT saramohammadaltaweel softdenturelineradhesiontoconventionalandcadcamprocessedpolymethylmethacrylateacrylicdentureresinsaninvitrostudy AT hanannejeralotaibi softdenturelineradhesiontoconventionalandcadcamprocessedpolymethylmethacrylateacrylicdentureresinsaninvitrostudy AT nawaflabban softdenturelineradhesiontoconventionalandcadcamprocessedpolymethylmethacrylateacrylicdentureresinsaninvitrostudy AT afnanalfouzan softdenturelineradhesiontoconventionalandcadcamprocessedpolymethylmethacrylateacrylicdentureresinsaninvitrostudy AT hudaalshehri softdenturelineradhesiontoconventionalandcadcamprocessedpolymethylmethacrylateacrylicdentureresinsaninvitrostudy |
_version_ |
1718431923904184320 |