Use of DNA barcode in the identification of catfishes (Siluriformes: Ariidae) from Malaysia

Abdullah ML, Nor SAM, Naim DMd. 2017. Use of DNA barcode in the identification of catfishes (Siluriformes: Ariidae) from Malaysia. Biodiversitas 18: 1358-1366. The genus Ariidae contains many valuable fish species threatened by overfishing, but knowledge on distribution and threats is still limited...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MOHD LUTFI ABDULLAH, SITI AZIZAH MOHD NOR, DARLINA MD. NAIM
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MBI & UNS Solo 2017
Materias:
coi
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0d903435ecdf49e598538132d90b491b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0d903435ecdf49e598538132d90b491b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0d903435ecdf49e598538132d90b491b2021-11-16T14:00:13ZUse of DNA barcode in the identification of catfishes (Siluriformes: Ariidae) from Malaysia1412-033X2085-472210.13057/biodiv/d180411https://doaj.org/article/0d903435ecdf49e598538132d90b491b2017-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://smujo.id/biodiv/article/view/2066https://doaj.org/toc/1412-033Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2085-4722Abdullah ML, Nor SAM, Naim DMd. 2017. Use of DNA barcode in the identification of catfishes (Siluriformes: Ariidae) from Malaysia. Biodiversitas 18: 1358-1366. The genus Ariidae contains many valuable fish species threatened by overfishing, but knowledge on distribution and threats is still limited due to taxonomic ambiguities. The aim of this study was to apply DNA barcoding techniques to establish a resource of DNA for identification of Ariidae species in Malaysia. A 621 bp of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene was utilized to resolve phylogenetic relationships and molecular taxonomy of eight presumed Malaysian Ariid species. We found the monophyly of most species was well established with a mean Kimura-2 parameter (K2P) interspecies distance of 9.6% except for two species, Arius venosus, and Nemapteryx caelata that have very low interspecies genetic distance. The BLAST result shows only two species matched the presumably eight identified fish species. Such discrepancies could arise as a result of misidentifications or errors in GenBank database input, hybridization or incomplete lineage sorting. We suggest the use of DNA barcoding is integrated into the workflow during taxonomic studies as it could significantly increase knowledge about species distributions.MOHD LUTFI ABDULLAHSITI AZIZAH MOHD NORDARLINA MD. NAIMMBI & UNS Soloarticleariidaecoidna barcodingphylogeneticconservationBiology (General)QH301-705.5ENBiodiversitas, Vol 18, Iss 4, Pp 1358-1366 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic ariidae
coi
dna barcoding
phylogenetic
conservation
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle ariidae
coi
dna barcoding
phylogenetic
conservation
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
MOHD LUTFI ABDULLAH
SITI AZIZAH MOHD NOR
DARLINA MD. NAIM
Use of DNA barcode in the identification of catfishes (Siluriformes: Ariidae) from Malaysia
description Abdullah ML, Nor SAM, Naim DMd. 2017. Use of DNA barcode in the identification of catfishes (Siluriformes: Ariidae) from Malaysia. Biodiversitas 18: 1358-1366. The genus Ariidae contains many valuable fish species threatened by overfishing, but knowledge on distribution and threats is still limited due to taxonomic ambiguities. The aim of this study was to apply DNA barcoding techniques to establish a resource of DNA for identification of Ariidae species in Malaysia. A 621 bp of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene was utilized to resolve phylogenetic relationships and molecular taxonomy of eight presumed Malaysian Ariid species. We found the monophyly of most species was well established with a mean Kimura-2 parameter (K2P) interspecies distance of 9.6% except for two species, Arius venosus, and Nemapteryx caelata that have very low interspecies genetic distance. The BLAST result shows only two species matched the presumably eight identified fish species. Such discrepancies could arise as a result of misidentifications or errors in GenBank database input, hybridization or incomplete lineage sorting. We suggest the use of DNA barcoding is integrated into the workflow during taxonomic studies as it could significantly increase knowledge about species distributions.
format article
author MOHD LUTFI ABDULLAH
SITI AZIZAH MOHD NOR
DARLINA MD. NAIM
author_facet MOHD LUTFI ABDULLAH
SITI AZIZAH MOHD NOR
DARLINA MD. NAIM
author_sort MOHD LUTFI ABDULLAH
title Use of DNA barcode in the identification of catfishes (Siluriformes: Ariidae) from Malaysia
title_short Use of DNA barcode in the identification of catfishes (Siluriformes: Ariidae) from Malaysia
title_full Use of DNA barcode in the identification of catfishes (Siluriformes: Ariidae) from Malaysia
title_fullStr Use of DNA barcode in the identification of catfishes (Siluriformes: Ariidae) from Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Use of DNA barcode in the identification of catfishes (Siluriformes: Ariidae) from Malaysia
title_sort use of dna barcode in the identification of catfishes (siluriformes: ariidae) from malaysia
publisher MBI & UNS Solo
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/0d903435ecdf49e598538132d90b491b
work_keys_str_mv AT mohdlutfiabdullah useofdnabarcodeintheidentificationofcatfishessiluriformesariidaefrommalaysia
AT sitiazizahmohdnor useofdnabarcodeintheidentificationofcatfishessiluriformesariidaefrommalaysia
AT darlinamdnaim useofdnabarcodeintheidentificationofcatfishessiluriformesariidaefrommalaysia
_version_ 1718426402753085440