ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION OF PORK MEAT CHAIN: A ROMANIAN CASE STUDY

The aim of this paper was to establish the environmental impacts of pork meat chain using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. For this study the system boundaries included: pig farm, slaughterhouse, meat processing, transport and waste treatment, which represent the main and secondary activitie...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cristina GHINEA, Ana LEAHU
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0d9c9093cc484d2c91d252fcac214d69
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0d9c9093cc484d2c91d252fcac214d69
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0d9c9093cc484d2c91d252fcac214d692021-12-02T17:50:23ZENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION OF PORK MEAT CHAIN: A ROMANIAN CASE STUDY2068-66092559-6381https://doaj.org/article/0d9c9093cc484d2c91d252fcac214d692018-06-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.fia.usv.ro/fiajournal/index.php/FENS/article/view/581/550https://doaj.org/toc/2068-6609https://doaj.org/toc/2559-6381The aim of this paper was to establish the environmental impacts of pork meat chain using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. For this study the system boundaries included: pig farm, slaughterhouse, meat processing, transport and waste treatment, which represent the main and secondary activities of a Romanian pork meat producer. All inputs and outputs data necessary for the inventory analysis were collected from this producer, GaBi database and other sources. The impact assessment phase was performed with GaBi software which includes LCA methods like CML2001 - Jan. 2016, ReCiPe 1.08, UBP 2013 and EDIP 2003. The results showed that pork meat chain has negative impact on the environment mainly contributing to the Acidification Potential (AP), Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP), Eutrophication Potential (EP) and Global Warming Potential (GWP 100 years). According to the results obtained with CML2001 - Jan. 2016 method, the main activities that contribute to global warming potential are manure storage (67.10%), central heating system (13.56%) and intensive pigs growth (9.59%). Similar results were obtained by applying of UBP 2013 method which indicated also that the manure storage is the main contributor to GWP (66%) followed by central heating system (14.33%) and intensive pigs’ growth (9.43%). Wastewater treatment is obvious the main contributor to ‘water pollutants’ category, while water consumption has a significant impact on ‘water resources’ according to UBP 2013 method. Resources like water and energy are necessary in very large quantities in meat production from which solid waste and wastewater result, thus increasing the environmental impacts of this process.Cristina GHINEAAna LEAHUStefan cel Mare University of Suceavaarticlefood industryglobal warming potentiallife cycle assessmentwasteFood processing and manufactureTP368-456ENFood and Environment Safety, Vol 17, Iss 2, Pp 205-212 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic food industry
global warming potential
life cycle assessment
waste
Food processing and manufacture
TP368-456
spellingShingle food industry
global warming potential
life cycle assessment
waste
Food processing and manufacture
TP368-456
Cristina GHINEA
Ana LEAHU
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION OF PORK MEAT CHAIN: A ROMANIAN CASE STUDY
description The aim of this paper was to establish the environmental impacts of pork meat chain using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. For this study the system boundaries included: pig farm, slaughterhouse, meat processing, transport and waste treatment, which represent the main and secondary activities of a Romanian pork meat producer. All inputs and outputs data necessary for the inventory analysis were collected from this producer, GaBi database and other sources. The impact assessment phase was performed with GaBi software which includes LCA methods like CML2001 - Jan. 2016, ReCiPe 1.08, UBP 2013 and EDIP 2003. The results showed that pork meat chain has negative impact on the environment mainly contributing to the Acidification Potential (AP), Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP), Eutrophication Potential (EP) and Global Warming Potential (GWP 100 years). According to the results obtained with CML2001 - Jan. 2016 method, the main activities that contribute to global warming potential are manure storage (67.10%), central heating system (13.56%) and intensive pigs growth (9.59%). Similar results were obtained by applying of UBP 2013 method which indicated also that the manure storage is the main contributor to GWP (66%) followed by central heating system (14.33%) and intensive pigs’ growth (9.43%). Wastewater treatment is obvious the main contributor to ‘water pollutants’ category, while water consumption has a significant impact on ‘water resources’ according to UBP 2013 method. Resources like water and energy are necessary in very large quantities in meat production from which solid waste and wastewater result, thus increasing the environmental impacts of this process.
format article
author Cristina GHINEA
Ana LEAHU
author_facet Cristina GHINEA
Ana LEAHU
author_sort Cristina GHINEA
title ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION OF PORK MEAT CHAIN: A ROMANIAN CASE STUDY
title_short ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION OF PORK MEAT CHAIN: A ROMANIAN CASE STUDY
title_full ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION OF PORK MEAT CHAIN: A ROMANIAN CASE STUDY
title_fullStr ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION OF PORK MEAT CHAIN: A ROMANIAN CASE STUDY
title_full_unstemmed ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION OF PORK MEAT CHAIN: A ROMANIAN CASE STUDY
title_sort environmental evaluation of pork meat chain: a romanian case study
publisher Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/0d9c9093cc484d2c91d252fcac214d69
work_keys_str_mv AT cristinaghinea environmentalevaluationofporkmeatchainaromaniancasestudy
AT analeahu environmentalevaluationofporkmeatchainaromaniancasestudy
_version_ 1718379330664398848