What does success look like? An indicative rubric to assess and guide the performance of marine participatory processes

Multistakeholder participatory processes are essential decision-making elements in contemporary contested marine spaces. Such processes have long time horizons, diverse interests, and complex objectives. Their complex and evolving nature make it difficult for participatory process proponents and par...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Erena Le Heron, Will Allen, Richard Le Heron, M. June Logie, Bruce Glavovic, Alison Greenaway, Daniel Hikuroa, Kathryn K. Davies, Paula Blackett
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Resilience Alliance 2021
Materias:	aotearoa new zealand contested marine spaces decision making formative evaluation governance participatory processes rubric success Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Ecology QH540-549.5
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/0e1d63bddfe54907829546125e5c07dc
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:0e1d63bddfe54907829546125e5c07dc
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:0e1d63bddfe54907829546125e5c07dc2021-12-02T14:21:42ZWhat does success look like? An indicative rubric to assess and guide the performance of marine participatory processes1708-308710.5751/ES-12211-260129https://doaj.org/article/0e1d63bddfe54907829546125e5c07dc2021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol26/iss1/art29/https://doaj.org/toc/1708-3087Multistakeholder participatory processes are essential decision-making elements in contemporary contested marine spaces. Such processes have long time horizons, diverse interests, and complex objectives. Their complex and evolving nature make it difficult for participatory process proponents and participants to adequately plan their processes and to assess performance quality. We position the findings of this paper in the context of participation as place-based, long-term, emergent, and complex processes in Aotearoa New Zealand. We pose the question "what does success look like?" in marine participatory processes. We provide an indicative answer in the form of a rubric, which outlines key components for navigating participatory processes through ongoing formative evaluation. The relationship between criteria and phases of participatory processes is stressed as "success" challenges, and achievements are unlikely to be stable from phase to phase. The notion of "whose success" is critically reflected upon, as the politics and power of success discourses shape what might be considered success in any given context, marine space, or participatory process. We argue that self-defined, ongoing learning evaluation, where criteria are debated and created by participatory process users, contributes to an empowering notion of success. Success as seen in this way is not an externally imposed set of standards to achieve but cocreated by those involved to best meet their needs. In this way, metaphors of success can be recognized, negotiated, circulated, and institutionalized. The authors' journey to developing the rubric helps unpack the key components of participatory processes and outlines its relationship to evaluation literature. Finally, we touch on the tension involved in creating a rubric for both practice and as a high-level discursive artifact.Erena Le HeronWill AllenRichard Le HeronM. June LogieBruce GlavovicAlison GreenawayDaniel HikuroaKathryn K. DaviesPaula BlackettResilience Alliancearticleaotearoa new zealandcontested marine spacesdecision makingformative evaluationgovernanceparticipatory processesrubricsuccessBiology (General)QH301-705.5EcologyQH540-549.5ENEcology and Society, Vol 26, Iss 1, p 29 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	aotearoa new zealand contested marine spaces decision making formative evaluation governance participatory processes rubric success Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Ecology QH540-549.5
spellingShingle	aotearoa new zealand contested marine spaces decision making formative evaluation governance participatory processes rubric success Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Ecology QH540-549.5 Erena Le Heron Will Allen Richard Le Heron M. June Logie Bruce Glavovic Alison Greenaway Daniel Hikuroa Kathryn K. Davies Paula Blackett What does success look like? An indicative rubric to assess and guide the performance of marine participatory processes
description	Multistakeholder participatory processes are essential decision-making elements in contemporary contested marine spaces. Such processes have long time horizons, diverse interests, and complex objectives. Their complex and evolving nature make it difficult for participatory process proponents and participants to adequately plan their processes and to assess performance quality. We position the findings of this paper in the context of participation as place-based, long-term, emergent, and complex processes in Aotearoa New Zealand. We pose the question "what does success look like?" in marine participatory processes. We provide an indicative answer in the form of a rubric, which outlines key components for navigating participatory processes through ongoing formative evaluation. The relationship between criteria and phases of participatory processes is stressed as "success" challenges, and achievements are unlikely to be stable from phase to phase. The notion of "whose success" is critically reflected upon, as the politics and power of success discourses shape what might be considered success in any given context, marine space, or participatory process. We argue that self-defined, ongoing learning evaluation, where criteria are debated and created by participatory process users, contributes to an empowering notion of success. Success as seen in this way is not an externally imposed set of standards to achieve but cocreated by those involved to best meet their needs. In this way, metaphors of success can be recognized, negotiated, circulated, and institutionalized. The authors' journey to developing the rubric helps unpack the key components of participatory processes and outlines its relationship to evaluation literature. Finally, we touch on the tension involved in creating a rubric for both practice and as a high-level discursive artifact.
format	article
author	Erena Le Heron Will Allen Richard Le Heron M. June Logie Bruce Glavovic Alison Greenaway Daniel Hikuroa Kathryn K. Davies Paula Blackett
author_facet	Erena Le Heron Will Allen Richard Le Heron M. June Logie Bruce Glavovic Alison Greenaway Daniel Hikuroa Kathryn K. Davies Paula Blackett
author_sort	Erena Le Heron
title	What does success look like? An indicative rubric to assess and guide the performance of marine participatory processes
title_short	What does success look like? An indicative rubric to assess and guide the performance of marine participatory processes
title_full	What does success look like? An indicative rubric to assess and guide the performance of marine participatory processes
title_fullStr	What does success look like? An indicative rubric to assess and guide the performance of marine participatory processes
title_full_unstemmed	What does success look like? An indicative rubric to assess and guide the performance of marine participatory processes
title_sort	what does success look like? an indicative rubric to assess and guide the performance of marine participatory processes
publisher	Resilience Alliance
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/0e1d63bddfe54907829546125e5c07dc
work_keys_str_mv	AT erenaleheron whatdoessuccesslooklikeanindicativerubrictoassessandguidetheperformanceofmarineparticipatoryprocesses AT willallen whatdoessuccesslooklikeanindicativerubrictoassessandguidetheperformanceofmarineparticipatoryprocesses AT richardleheron whatdoessuccesslooklikeanindicativerubrictoassessandguidetheperformanceofmarineparticipatoryprocesses AT mjunelogie whatdoessuccesslooklikeanindicativerubrictoassessandguidetheperformanceofmarineparticipatoryprocesses AT bruceglavovic whatdoessuccesslooklikeanindicativerubrictoassessandguidetheperformanceofmarineparticipatoryprocesses AT alisongreenaway whatdoessuccesslooklikeanindicativerubrictoassessandguidetheperformanceofmarineparticipatoryprocesses AT danielhikuroa whatdoessuccesslooklikeanindicativerubrictoassessandguidetheperformanceofmarineparticipatoryprocesses AT kathrynkdavies whatdoessuccesslooklikeanindicativerubrictoassessandguidetheperformanceofmarineparticipatoryprocesses AT paulablackett whatdoessuccesslooklikeanindicativerubrictoassessandguidetheperformanceofmarineparticipatoryprocesses
_version_	1718391468729565184

What does success look like? An indicative rubric to assess and guide the performance of marine participatory processes

Ejemplares similares