A multicenter retrospective comparison of goniotomy versus trabecular bypass device implantation in glaucoma patients undergoing cataract extraction

Syril K Dorairaj,1 Malik Y Kahook,2 Blake K Williamson,3 Leonard K Seibold,4 Mohammed K ElMallah,5 Inder P Singh6 On behalf of the KDB Goniotomy Study Group 1Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 2School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, 3Williamson Eye Center,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dorairaj SK, Kahook MY, Williamson BK, Seibold LK, ElMallah MK, Singh IP
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0e1eb1511b2140cfb5ca9ebfd1ed6df8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0e1eb1511b2140cfb5ca9ebfd1ed6df8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0e1eb1511b2140cfb5ca9ebfd1ed6df82021-12-02T09:23:47ZA multicenter retrospective comparison of goniotomy versus trabecular bypass device implantation in glaucoma patients undergoing cataract extraction1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/0e1eb1511b2140cfb5ca9ebfd1ed6df82018-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/a-multicenter-retrospective-comparison-of-goniotomy-versus-trabecular--peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Syril K Dorairaj,1 Malik Y Kahook,2 Blake K Williamson,3 Leonard K Seibold,4 Mohammed K ElMallah,5 Inder P Singh6 On behalf of the KDB Goniotomy Study Group 1Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 2School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, 3Williamson Eye Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 4School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, 5Ocala Eye, Ocala, FL, 6The Eye Center of Racine and Kenosha, Kenosha, WI, USA Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) outcomes in eyes with cataract and glaucoma undergoing phacoemulsification (phaco) in combination with goniotomy using the Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) or implantation of a single iStent trabecular bypass device.Methods: Retrospective analysis of IOP and IOP-lowering medication reduction in eyes undergoing phaco-goniotomy with KDB (n=237) or phaco-iStent (n=198). Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected through 6 months of follow-up. Outcome measures included mean IOP reduction, mean reduction in IOP-lowering medications, and the proportion of eyes achieving ≥20% IOP reduction or ≥1 medication reduction from baseline.Results: Mean IOP in the phaco-goniotomy with KDB group decreased from 17.9±4.4 mmHg at baseline to 13.6±2.7 mmHg at Month 6 (P<0.001), with mean medication use decreasing from 1.7±0.9 to 0.6±1.0 (P<0.001). In the phaco-iStent group, mean IOP decreased from 16.7±4.4 mmHg to 13.9±2.7 mmHg (P<0.001), with mean IOP-lowering medication use decreasing from 1.9±0.9 to 1.0±1.0 (P<0.001). Mean IOP reduction from baseline was significantly greater in the phaco-goniotomy with KDB group at Month 6 (phaco-goniotomy with KDB −4.2 mmHg [23.7%] vs phaco-iStent −2.7 mmHg [16.4%]; P<0.001). IOP-lowering medication reduction was greater in the phaco-goniotomy with KDB group compared to the phaco-iStent group (1.1 vs 0.9 medications, respectively; P=0.001). The most common adverse event was IOP spikes occurring in 12.6% of phaco-iStent eyes and 6.3% of phaco-goniotomy with KDB eyes (P=0.024).Conclusion: Goniotomy with the KDB combined with cataract surgery significantly lowers both IOP and the need for IOP-lowering medications compared to cataract extraction with iStent implantation in glaucomatous eyes through 6 months of postoperative follow-up. Keywords: glaucoma, goniotomy, intraocular pressureDorairaj SKKahook MYWilliamson BKSeibold LKElMallah MKSingh IPDove Medical Pressarticleglaucomagoniotomyintraocular pressureOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 12, Pp 791-797 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic glaucoma
goniotomy
intraocular pressure
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle glaucoma
goniotomy
intraocular pressure
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Dorairaj SK
Kahook MY
Williamson BK
Seibold LK
ElMallah MK
Singh IP
A multicenter retrospective comparison of goniotomy versus trabecular bypass device implantation in glaucoma patients undergoing cataract extraction
description Syril K Dorairaj,1 Malik Y Kahook,2 Blake K Williamson,3 Leonard K Seibold,4 Mohammed K ElMallah,5 Inder P Singh6 On behalf of the KDB Goniotomy Study Group 1Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 2School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, 3Williamson Eye Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 4School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, 5Ocala Eye, Ocala, FL, 6The Eye Center of Racine and Kenosha, Kenosha, WI, USA Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) outcomes in eyes with cataract and glaucoma undergoing phacoemulsification (phaco) in combination with goniotomy using the Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) or implantation of a single iStent trabecular bypass device.Methods: Retrospective analysis of IOP and IOP-lowering medication reduction in eyes undergoing phaco-goniotomy with KDB (n=237) or phaco-iStent (n=198). Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected through 6 months of follow-up. Outcome measures included mean IOP reduction, mean reduction in IOP-lowering medications, and the proportion of eyes achieving ≥20% IOP reduction or ≥1 medication reduction from baseline.Results: Mean IOP in the phaco-goniotomy with KDB group decreased from 17.9±4.4 mmHg at baseline to 13.6±2.7 mmHg at Month 6 (P<0.001), with mean medication use decreasing from 1.7±0.9 to 0.6±1.0 (P<0.001). In the phaco-iStent group, mean IOP decreased from 16.7±4.4 mmHg to 13.9±2.7 mmHg (P<0.001), with mean IOP-lowering medication use decreasing from 1.9±0.9 to 1.0±1.0 (P<0.001). Mean IOP reduction from baseline was significantly greater in the phaco-goniotomy with KDB group at Month 6 (phaco-goniotomy with KDB −4.2 mmHg [23.7%] vs phaco-iStent −2.7 mmHg [16.4%]; P<0.001). IOP-lowering medication reduction was greater in the phaco-goniotomy with KDB group compared to the phaco-iStent group (1.1 vs 0.9 medications, respectively; P=0.001). The most common adverse event was IOP spikes occurring in 12.6% of phaco-iStent eyes and 6.3% of phaco-goniotomy with KDB eyes (P=0.024).Conclusion: Goniotomy with the KDB combined with cataract surgery significantly lowers both IOP and the need for IOP-lowering medications compared to cataract extraction with iStent implantation in glaucomatous eyes through 6 months of postoperative follow-up. Keywords: glaucoma, goniotomy, intraocular pressure
format article
author Dorairaj SK
Kahook MY
Williamson BK
Seibold LK
ElMallah MK
Singh IP
author_facet Dorairaj SK
Kahook MY
Williamson BK
Seibold LK
ElMallah MK
Singh IP
author_sort Dorairaj SK
title A multicenter retrospective comparison of goniotomy versus trabecular bypass device implantation in glaucoma patients undergoing cataract extraction
title_short A multicenter retrospective comparison of goniotomy versus trabecular bypass device implantation in glaucoma patients undergoing cataract extraction
title_full A multicenter retrospective comparison of goniotomy versus trabecular bypass device implantation in glaucoma patients undergoing cataract extraction
title_fullStr A multicenter retrospective comparison of goniotomy versus trabecular bypass device implantation in glaucoma patients undergoing cataract extraction
title_full_unstemmed A multicenter retrospective comparison of goniotomy versus trabecular bypass device implantation in glaucoma patients undergoing cataract extraction
title_sort multicenter retrospective comparison of goniotomy versus trabecular bypass device implantation in glaucoma patients undergoing cataract extraction
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/0e1eb1511b2140cfb5ca9ebfd1ed6df8
work_keys_str_mv AT dorairajsk amulticenterretrospectivecomparisonofgoniotomyversustrabecularbypassdeviceimplantationinglaucomapatientsundergoingcataractextraction
AT kahookmy amulticenterretrospectivecomparisonofgoniotomyversustrabecularbypassdeviceimplantationinglaucomapatientsundergoingcataractextraction
AT williamsonbk amulticenterretrospectivecomparisonofgoniotomyversustrabecularbypassdeviceimplantationinglaucomapatientsundergoingcataractextraction
AT seiboldlk amulticenterretrospectivecomparisonofgoniotomyversustrabecularbypassdeviceimplantationinglaucomapatientsundergoingcataractextraction
AT elmallahmk amulticenterretrospectivecomparisonofgoniotomyversustrabecularbypassdeviceimplantationinglaucomapatientsundergoingcataractextraction
AT singhip amulticenterretrospectivecomparisonofgoniotomyversustrabecularbypassdeviceimplantationinglaucomapatientsundergoingcataractextraction
AT dorairajsk multicenterretrospectivecomparisonofgoniotomyversustrabecularbypassdeviceimplantationinglaucomapatientsundergoingcataractextraction
AT kahookmy multicenterretrospectivecomparisonofgoniotomyversustrabecularbypassdeviceimplantationinglaucomapatientsundergoingcataractextraction
AT williamsonbk multicenterretrospectivecomparisonofgoniotomyversustrabecularbypassdeviceimplantationinglaucomapatientsundergoingcataractextraction
AT seiboldlk multicenterretrospectivecomparisonofgoniotomyversustrabecularbypassdeviceimplantationinglaucomapatientsundergoingcataractextraction
AT elmallahmk multicenterretrospectivecomparisonofgoniotomyversustrabecularbypassdeviceimplantationinglaucomapatientsundergoingcataractextraction
AT singhip multicenterretrospectivecomparisonofgoniotomyversustrabecularbypassdeviceimplantationinglaucomapatientsundergoingcataractextraction
_version_ 1718398106039484416