Benchmarking selected computational gene network growing tools in context of virus-host interactions

Abstract Several available online tools provide network growing functions where an algorithm utilizing different data sources suggests additional genes/proteins that should connect an input gene set into functionally meaningful networks. Using the well-studied system of influenza host interactions,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biruhalem Taye, Candida Vaz, Vivek Tanavde, Vladimir A. Kuznetsov, Frank Eisenhaber, Richard J. Sugrue, Sebastian Maurer-Stroh
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0e254567aa94483c8cfe264b6e1e0cf0
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0e254567aa94483c8cfe264b6e1e0cf0
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0e254567aa94483c8cfe264b6e1e0cf02021-12-02T11:40:33ZBenchmarking selected computational gene network growing tools in context of virus-host interactions10.1038/s41598-017-06020-62045-2322https://doaj.org/article/0e254567aa94483c8cfe264b6e1e0cf02017-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06020-6https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Several available online tools provide network growing functions where an algorithm utilizing different data sources suggests additional genes/proteins that should connect an input gene set into functionally meaningful networks. Using the well-studied system of influenza host interactions, we compare the network growing function of two free tools GeneMANIA and STRING and the commercial IPA for their performance of recovering known influenza A virus host factors previously identified from siRNA screens. The result showed that given small (~30 genes) or medium (~150 genes) input sets all three network growing tools detect significantly more known host factors than random human genes with STRING overall performing strongest. Extending the networks with all the three tools significantly improved the detection of GO biological processes of known host factors compared to not growing networks. Interestingly, the rate of identification of true host factors using computational network growing is equal or better to doing another experimental siRNA screening study which could also be true and applied to other biological pathways/processes.Biruhalem TayeCandida VazVivek TanavdeVladimir A. KuznetsovFrank EisenhaberRichard J. SugrueSebastian Maurer-StrohNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Biruhalem Taye
Candida Vaz
Vivek Tanavde
Vladimir A. Kuznetsov
Frank Eisenhaber
Richard J. Sugrue
Sebastian Maurer-Stroh
Benchmarking selected computational gene network growing tools in context of virus-host interactions
description Abstract Several available online tools provide network growing functions where an algorithm utilizing different data sources suggests additional genes/proteins that should connect an input gene set into functionally meaningful networks. Using the well-studied system of influenza host interactions, we compare the network growing function of two free tools GeneMANIA and STRING and the commercial IPA for their performance of recovering known influenza A virus host factors previously identified from siRNA screens. The result showed that given small (~30 genes) or medium (~150 genes) input sets all three network growing tools detect significantly more known host factors than random human genes with STRING overall performing strongest. Extending the networks with all the three tools significantly improved the detection of GO biological processes of known host factors compared to not growing networks. Interestingly, the rate of identification of true host factors using computational network growing is equal or better to doing another experimental siRNA screening study which could also be true and applied to other biological pathways/processes.
format article
author Biruhalem Taye
Candida Vaz
Vivek Tanavde
Vladimir A. Kuznetsov
Frank Eisenhaber
Richard J. Sugrue
Sebastian Maurer-Stroh
author_facet Biruhalem Taye
Candida Vaz
Vivek Tanavde
Vladimir A. Kuznetsov
Frank Eisenhaber
Richard J. Sugrue
Sebastian Maurer-Stroh
author_sort Biruhalem Taye
title Benchmarking selected computational gene network growing tools in context of virus-host interactions
title_short Benchmarking selected computational gene network growing tools in context of virus-host interactions
title_full Benchmarking selected computational gene network growing tools in context of virus-host interactions
title_fullStr Benchmarking selected computational gene network growing tools in context of virus-host interactions
title_full_unstemmed Benchmarking selected computational gene network growing tools in context of virus-host interactions
title_sort benchmarking selected computational gene network growing tools in context of virus-host interactions
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/0e254567aa94483c8cfe264b6e1e0cf0
work_keys_str_mv AT biruhalemtaye benchmarkingselectedcomputationalgenenetworkgrowingtoolsincontextofvirushostinteractions
AT candidavaz benchmarkingselectedcomputationalgenenetworkgrowingtoolsincontextofvirushostinteractions
AT vivektanavde benchmarkingselectedcomputationalgenenetworkgrowingtoolsincontextofvirushostinteractions
AT vladimirakuznetsov benchmarkingselectedcomputationalgenenetworkgrowingtoolsincontextofvirushostinteractions
AT frankeisenhaber benchmarkingselectedcomputationalgenenetworkgrowingtoolsincontextofvirushostinteractions
AT richardjsugrue benchmarkingselectedcomputationalgenenetworkgrowingtoolsincontextofvirushostinteractions
AT sebastianmaurerstroh benchmarkingselectedcomputationalgenenetworkgrowingtoolsincontextofvirushostinteractions
_version_ 1718395561594322944