Benchmarking selected computational gene network growing tools in context of virus-host interactions
Abstract Several available online tools provide network growing functions where an algorithm utilizing different data sources suggests additional genes/proteins that should connect an input gene set into functionally meaningful networks. Using the well-studied system of influenza host interactions,...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/0e254567aa94483c8cfe264b6e1e0cf0 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:0e254567aa94483c8cfe264b6e1e0cf0 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:0e254567aa94483c8cfe264b6e1e0cf02021-12-02T11:40:33ZBenchmarking selected computational gene network growing tools in context of virus-host interactions10.1038/s41598-017-06020-62045-2322https://doaj.org/article/0e254567aa94483c8cfe264b6e1e0cf02017-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06020-6https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Several available online tools provide network growing functions where an algorithm utilizing different data sources suggests additional genes/proteins that should connect an input gene set into functionally meaningful networks. Using the well-studied system of influenza host interactions, we compare the network growing function of two free tools GeneMANIA and STRING and the commercial IPA for their performance of recovering known influenza A virus host factors previously identified from siRNA screens. The result showed that given small (~30 genes) or medium (~150 genes) input sets all three network growing tools detect significantly more known host factors than random human genes with STRING overall performing strongest. Extending the networks with all the three tools significantly improved the detection of GO biological processes of known host factors compared to not growing networks. Interestingly, the rate of identification of true host factors using computational network growing is equal or better to doing another experimental siRNA screening study which could also be true and applied to other biological pathways/processes.Biruhalem TayeCandida VazVivek TanavdeVladimir A. KuznetsovFrank EisenhaberRichard J. SugrueSebastian Maurer-StrohNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2017) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Biruhalem Taye Candida Vaz Vivek Tanavde Vladimir A. Kuznetsov Frank Eisenhaber Richard J. Sugrue Sebastian Maurer-Stroh Benchmarking selected computational gene network growing tools in context of virus-host interactions |
description |
Abstract Several available online tools provide network growing functions where an algorithm utilizing different data sources suggests additional genes/proteins that should connect an input gene set into functionally meaningful networks. Using the well-studied system of influenza host interactions, we compare the network growing function of two free tools GeneMANIA and STRING and the commercial IPA for their performance of recovering known influenza A virus host factors previously identified from siRNA screens. The result showed that given small (~30 genes) or medium (~150 genes) input sets all three network growing tools detect significantly more known host factors than random human genes with STRING overall performing strongest. Extending the networks with all the three tools significantly improved the detection of GO biological processes of known host factors compared to not growing networks. Interestingly, the rate of identification of true host factors using computational network growing is equal or better to doing another experimental siRNA screening study which could also be true and applied to other biological pathways/processes. |
format |
article |
author |
Biruhalem Taye Candida Vaz Vivek Tanavde Vladimir A. Kuznetsov Frank Eisenhaber Richard J. Sugrue Sebastian Maurer-Stroh |
author_facet |
Biruhalem Taye Candida Vaz Vivek Tanavde Vladimir A. Kuznetsov Frank Eisenhaber Richard J. Sugrue Sebastian Maurer-Stroh |
author_sort |
Biruhalem Taye |
title |
Benchmarking selected computational gene network growing tools in context of virus-host interactions |
title_short |
Benchmarking selected computational gene network growing tools in context of virus-host interactions |
title_full |
Benchmarking selected computational gene network growing tools in context of virus-host interactions |
title_fullStr |
Benchmarking selected computational gene network growing tools in context of virus-host interactions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Benchmarking selected computational gene network growing tools in context of virus-host interactions |
title_sort |
benchmarking selected computational gene network growing tools in context of virus-host interactions |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/0e254567aa94483c8cfe264b6e1e0cf0 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT biruhalemtaye benchmarkingselectedcomputationalgenenetworkgrowingtoolsincontextofvirushostinteractions AT candidavaz benchmarkingselectedcomputationalgenenetworkgrowingtoolsincontextofvirushostinteractions AT vivektanavde benchmarkingselectedcomputationalgenenetworkgrowingtoolsincontextofvirushostinteractions AT vladimirakuznetsov benchmarkingselectedcomputationalgenenetworkgrowingtoolsincontextofvirushostinteractions AT frankeisenhaber benchmarkingselectedcomputationalgenenetworkgrowingtoolsincontextofvirushostinteractions AT richardjsugrue benchmarkingselectedcomputationalgenenetworkgrowingtoolsincontextofvirushostinteractions AT sebastianmaurerstroh benchmarkingselectedcomputationalgenenetworkgrowingtoolsincontextofvirushostinteractions |
_version_ |
1718395561594322944 |