Sex differences in neural mechanisms of social and non-social threat monitoring

Adolescent males and females differ in their responses to social threat. Yet, threat processing is often probed in non-social contexts using the error-related negativity (ERN; Flanker EEG Task), which does not yield sex-specific outcomes. fMRI studies show inconsistent patterns of sex-specific neura...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tessa Clarkson, Yvette Karvay, Megan Quarmley, Johanna M. Jarcho
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
EEG
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0e452928d63d4f22a9084d5a26279cb4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0e452928d63d4f22a9084d5a26279cb4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0e452928d63d4f22a9084d5a26279cb42021-11-22T04:20:07ZSex differences in neural mechanisms of social and non-social threat monitoring1878-929310.1016/j.dcn.2021.101038https://doaj.org/article/0e452928d63d4f22a9084d5a26279cb42021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929321001274https://doaj.org/toc/1878-9293Adolescent males and females differ in their responses to social threat. Yet, threat processing is often probed in non-social contexts using the error-related negativity (ERN; Flanker EEG Task), which does not yield sex-specific outcomes. fMRI studies show inconsistent patterns of sex-specific neural engagement during threat processing. Thus, the relation between threat processing in non-social and social contexts across sexes and the effects perceived level of threat on brain function are unclear. We tested the interactive effect of non-social threat-vigilance (ERN), sex (N = 69; Male=34; 11–14-year-olds), and perceived social threat on brain function while anticipating feedback from ‘unpredictable’, ‘nice’, or ‘mean’ purported peers (fMRI; Virtual School Paradigm). Whole-brain analyses revealed differential engagement of precentral and inferior frontal gyri, putamen, anterior cingulate cortex, and insula. Among males with more threat-vigilant ERNs, greater social threat was associated with increased activation when anticipating unpredictable feedback. Region of interest analyses revealed this same relation in females in the amygdala and anterior hippocampus when anticipating mean feedback. Thus, non-social threat vigilance relates to neural engagement depending on perceived social threat, but peer-based social contexts and brain regions engaged, differ across sexes. This may partially explain divergent psychosocial outcomes in adolescence.Tessa ClarksonYvette KarvayMegan QuarmleyJohanna M. JarchoElsevierarticleError-Related NegativityVirtual School ParadigmSocial ThreatFMRIEEGAdolescenceNeurophysiology and neuropsychologyQP351-495ENDevelopmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol 52, Iss , Pp 101038- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Error-Related Negativity
Virtual School Paradigm
Social Threat
FMRI
EEG
Adolescence
Neurophysiology and neuropsychology
QP351-495
spellingShingle Error-Related Negativity
Virtual School Paradigm
Social Threat
FMRI
EEG
Adolescence
Neurophysiology and neuropsychology
QP351-495
Tessa Clarkson
Yvette Karvay
Megan Quarmley
Johanna M. Jarcho
Sex differences in neural mechanisms of social and non-social threat monitoring
description Adolescent males and females differ in their responses to social threat. Yet, threat processing is often probed in non-social contexts using the error-related negativity (ERN; Flanker EEG Task), which does not yield sex-specific outcomes. fMRI studies show inconsistent patterns of sex-specific neural engagement during threat processing. Thus, the relation between threat processing in non-social and social contexts across sexes and the effects perceived level of threat on brain function are unclear. We tested the interactive effect of non-social threat-vigilance (ERN), sex (N = 69; Male=34; 11–14-year-olds), and perceived social threat on brain function while anticipating feedback from ‘unpredictable’, ‘nice’, or ‘mean’ purported peers (fMRI; Virtual School Paradigm). Whole-brain analyses revealed differential engagement of precentral and inferior frontal gyri, putamen, anterior cingulate cortex, and insula. Among males with more threat-vigilant ERNs, greater social threat was associated with increased activation when anticipating unpredictable feedback. Region of interest analyses revealed this same relation in females in the amygdala and anterior hippocampus when anticipating mean feedback. Thus, non-social threat vigilance relates to neural engagement depending on perceived social threat, but peer-based social contexts and brain regions engaged, differ across sexes. This may partially explain divergent psychosocial outcomes in adolescence.
format article
author Tessa Clarkson
Yvette Karvay
Megan Quarmley
Johanna M. Jarcho
author_facet Tessa Clarkson
Yvette Karvay
Megan Quarmley
Johanna M. Jarcho
author_sort Tessa Clarkson
title Sex differences in neural mechanisms of social and non-social threat monitoring
title_short Sex differences in neural mechanisms of social and non-social threat monitoring
title_full Sex differences in neural mechanisms of social and non-social threat monitoring
title_fullStr Sex differences in neural mechanisms of social and non-social threat monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in neural mechanisms of social and non-social threat monitoring
title_sort sex differences in neural mechanisms of social and non-social threat monitoring
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/0e452928d63d4f22a9084d5a26279cb4
work_keys_str_mv AT tessaclarkson sexdifferencesinneuralmechanismsofsocialandnonsocialthreatmonitoring
AT yvettekarvay sexdifferencesinneuralmechanismsofsocialandnonsocialthreatmonitoring
AT meganquarmley sexdifferencesinneuralmechanismsofsocialandnonsocialthreatmonitoring
AT johannamjarcho sexdifferencesinneuralmechanismsofsocialandnonsocialthreatmonitoring
_version_ 1718418205031006208