Systematic differences in effect estimates between observational studies and randomized control trials in meta-analyses in nephrology
Abstract The limited availability of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in nephrology undermines causal inferences in meta-analyses. Systematic reviews of observational studies have grown more common under such circumstances. We conducted systematic reviews of all comparative observational studies...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Miho Kimachi, Akira Onishi, Aran Tajika, Kimihiko Kimachi, Toshi A. Furukawa |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/0e539c600e914abfaba78ce9313139a1 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Development of folding method for three dimensionally foldable cylindrical structure with base
por: Reo KIMACHI, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
The totally extraperitoneal method versus Lichtenstein's technique for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of randomized clinical trials.
por: G G Koning, et al.
Publicado: (2013) - Nephrology
- Pediatric nephrology journal of the International Pediatric Nephrology Association.
-
Nephrology reviews
Publicado: (2009)