Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Treatment-Naïve Diabetic Macular Edema: A Prospective, Uncontrolled Pilot Study
Ryan B Rush,1– 4 Sloan W Rush2,3 1Instituto de la Visión– Hospital La Carlota, Montemorelos, Nuevo León, 67530, México; 2Panhandle Eye Group, Amarillo, TX, 79106, USA; 3Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, Amarillo,...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/0e75bc6e44464f27878326e6487097c8 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Sumario: | Ryan B Rush,1– 4 Sloan W Rush2,3 1Instituto de la Visión– Hospital La Carlota, Montemorelos, Nuevo León, 67530, México; 2Panhandle Eye Group, Amarillo, TX, 79106, USA; 3Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, Amarillo, TX, 79106, USA; 4Southwest Retina Specialists, Amarillo, TX, 79106, USACorrespondence: Ryan B RushSouthwest Retina Specialists, 7411 Wallace Blvd, Amarillo, TX, 79106, USATel +1 806 351-1870Email ryan.rush.md@gmail.comPurpose: To report the outcomes in subjects undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for the management of treatment-naïve diabetic macular edema (DME).Methods: Ten treatment-naïve subjects with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy prospectively underwent PPV with ILM peeling for the treatment of DME at a single university-affiliated institution. The preoperative features, intraoperative details and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed.Results: All 10 subjects underwent PPV with ILM peeling without significant intraoperative or postoperative complications at 6 months follow-up. Visual acuity improved from a baseline of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.48– 1.0) logMAR (Snellen 20/110) to 0.46 (95% CI: 0.3– 0.62) logMAR (Snellen 20/58) at 6 months follow-up (p=0.045). Optical coherence tomography central macular thickness reduced from a baseline of 456 (95% CI: 394.7– 516.4) microns to 316.8 (95% CI: 275.9– 357.7) microns at 6 months follow-up (p < 0.001).Conclusion: This pilot study suggests that PPV with ILM peeling may be a viable treatment option for the management of treatment naïve DME in subjects with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Development of a randomized controlled trial may be justified to validate the results of this study.Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier #: NCT03660345.Keywords: vitrectomy, internal limiting membrane peeling, diabetic macular edema |
---|