Gazing over the horizon: Will an equitable Green Climate Fund allocation policy be significant for the Pacific post-2020?

The establishment of the Green Climate Fund (GCF) has increased expectations and optimism amongst developing countries, especially those that are particularly vulnerable to climate change. The GCF aims to channel a significant portion of global funds for climate change response, with a goal of reac...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jale Samuwai, Jeremy Maxwell Hills
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Asia Pacific Network 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0e79db32afb7430dad370beebeb9f7d3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0e79db32afb7430dad370beebeb9f7d3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0e79db32afb7430dad370beebeb9f7d32021-12-02T12:05:44ZGazing over the horizon: Will an equitable Green Climate Fund allocation policy be significant for the Pacific post-2020?10.24135/pjr.v25i1.3931023-94992324-2035https://doaj.org/article/0e79db32afb7430dad370beebeb9f7d32019-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/393https://doaj.org/toc/1023-9499https://doaj.org/toc/2324-2035 The establishment of the Green Climate Fund (GCF) has increased expectations and optimism amongst developing countries, especially those that are particularly vulnerable to climate change. The GCF aims to channel a significant portion of global funds for climate change response, with a goal of reaching US$100 billion per year by 2020. Portrayed as a timely saviour to the climate finance needs of vulnerable countries, the allocation of GCF funds among countries will be key to low carbon and resilient futures. Its broad allocation policy increases the possibility that particularly vulnerable countries which have struggled to access international climate finance will continue to face such challenges. Adopting an equitable/fair principle of allocation, this article highlights a number of scenarios on the possible impact of the post-2020 climate financing environment on particularly vulnerable countries with a special focus on the Pacific Small Island Developing States (PSIDS). This study argues that PSIDS are extremely sensitive to GCF allocation mechanisms. While the study supports the notion of balanced allocation as currently advanced by the GCF, the precarious situation of PSIDS necessitates a re-think of how the GCF finance is to be allocated in the future. Jale SamuwaiJeremy Maxwell HillsAsia Pacific Networkarticleclimate changeclimate financeGreen Climate FundPacific Small Island Developing StatesCommunication. Mass mediaP87-96Journalism. The periodical press, etc.PN4699-5650ENPacific Journalism Review, Vol 25, Iss 1&2 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic climate change
climate finance
Green Climate Fund
Pacific Small Island Developing States
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Journalism. The periodical press, etc.
PN4699-5650
spellingShingle climate change
climate finance
Green Climate Fund
Pacific Small Island Developing States
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Journalism. The periodical press, etc.
PN4699-5650
Jale Samuwai
Jeremy Maxwell Hills
Gazing over the horizon: Will an equitable Green Climate Fund allocation policy be significant for the Pacific post-2020?
description The establishment of the Green Climate Fund (GCF) has increased expectations and optimism amongst developing countries, especially those that are particularly vulnerable to climate change. The GCF aims to channel a significant portion of global funds for climate change response, with a goal of reaching US$100 billion per year by 2020. Portrayed as a timely saviour to the climate finance needs of vulnerable countries, the allocation of GCF funds among countries will be key to low carbon and resilient futures. Its broad allocation policy increases the possibility that particularly vulnerable countries which have struggled to access international climate finance will continue to face such challenges. Adopting an equitable/fair principle of allocation, this article highlights a number of scenarios on the possible impact of the post-2020 climate financing environment on particularly vulnerable countries with a special focus on the Pacific Small Island Developing States (PSIDS). This study argues that PSIDS are extremely sensitive to GCF allocation mechanisms. While the study supports the notion of balanced allocation as currently advanced by the GCF, the precarious situation of PSIDS necessitates a re-think of how the GCF finance is to be allocated in the future.
format article
author Jale Samuwai
Jeremy Maxwell Hills
author_facet Jale Samuwai
Jeremy Maxwell Hills
author_sort Jale Samuwai
title Gazing over the horizon: Will an equitable Green Climate Fund allocation policy be significant for the Pacific post-2020?
title_short Gazing over the horizon: Will an equitable Green Climate Fund allocation policy be significant for the Pacific post-2020?
title_full Gazing over the horizon: Will an equitable Green Climate Fund allocation policy be significant for the Pacific post-2020?
title_fullStr Gazing over the horizon: Will an equitable Green Climate Fund allocation policy be significant for the Pacific post-2020?
title_full_unstemmed Gazing over the horizon: Will an equitable Green Climate Fund allocation policy be significant for the Pacific post-2020?
title_sort gazing over the horizon: will an equitable green climate fund allocation policy be significant for the pacific post-2020?
publisher Asia Pacific Network
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/0e79db32afb7430dad370beebeb9f7d3
work_keys_str_mv AT jalesamuwai gazingoverthehorizonwillanequitablegreenclimatefundallocationpolicybesignificantforthepacificpost2020
AT jeremymaxwellhills gazingoverthehorizonwillanequitablegreenclimatefundallocationpolicybesignificantforthepacificpost2020
_version_ 1718394673702109184