The effects of quality of evidence communication on perception of public health information about COVID-19: Two randomised controlled trials.
<h4>Background</h4>The quality of evidence about the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical health interventions is often low, but little is known about the effects of communicating indications of evidence quality to the public.<h4>Methods</h4>In two blinded, randomised, control...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Claudia R Schneider, Alexandra L J Freeman, David Spiegelhalter, Sander van der Linden |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/0efcf9dd577f4a31b4b7ae4529f35239 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
The effects of quality of evidence communication on perception of public health information about COVID-19: Two randomised controlled trials
por: Claudia R. Schneider, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Much ado about something: a response to “COVID-19: underpowered randomised trials, or no randomised trials?”
por: Noah A. Haber, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Observational research, randomised trials, and two views of medical science.
por: Jan P Vandenbroucke
Publicado: (2008) -
A randomised controlled trial of two infusion rates to decrease reactions to antivenom.
por: Geoffrey K Isbister, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Reducing antibiotic prescribing by enhancing communication of general practitioners with their immigrant patients: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (PARCA study)
por: Daan Nieboer, et al.
Publicado: (2021)