Why Did It Take So Many Decades for the Behavioral Sciences to Develop a Sense of Crisis Around Methodology and Replication?
For several decades, leading behavioral scientists have offered strong criticisms of the common practice of null hypothesis significance testing as producing spurious findings without strong theoretical or empirical support. But only in the past decade has this manifested as a full-scale replication...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Andrew Gelman, Simine Vazire |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
University of Arizona Libraries
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/0f10965fbdb849c7bc3ee688d0acb2df |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Sex determination: why so many ways of doing it?
por: Doris Bachtrog, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Why so many apparently rare beetles in Chilean temperate rainforests?
por: RICHARDSON,BARRY J, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Why Did the Successors Meet at Triparadeisus?
por: Ian Worthington
Publicado: (2019) -
Why are men so irresponsible?
por: Kaztman, Rubén
Publicado: (2014) -
NOTED: Why so much grimness and so little hope?
por: Allison Oosterman, et al.
Publicado: (2014)