The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals
To increase transparency in science, some scholarly journals have begun publishing peer review reports. Here, the authors show how this policy shift affects reviewer behavior by analyzing data from five journals piloting open peer review.
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Giangiacomo Bravo, Francisco Grimaldo, Emilia López-Iñesta, Bahar Mehmani, Flaminio Squazzoni |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/0f1fce6b681945dd874ed90fd6b9e522 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals.
por: Flaminio Squazzoni, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Journal of scholarly publishing
Publicado: (1994) -
Improving Submissions to Scholarly Journals via Peer Review
por: Lilia Raitskaya, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Referees list
por: Journal Vitae
Publicado: (2012) -
REFEREES LIST
por: Luis G. RESTREPO V.
Publicado: (2011)