Pan-cancer analysis of non-oncogene addiction to DNA repair

Abstract Cancer cells usually depend on the aberrant function of one or few driver genes to initiate and promote their malignancy, an attribute known as oncogene addiction. However, cancer cells might become dependent on the normal cellular functions of certain genes that are not oncogenes but ensur...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Luis Bermúdez-Guzmán
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0f2665cd6d9046259223d3a03c0af7e3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0f2665cd6d9046259223d3a03c0af7e3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0f2665cd6d9046259223d3a03c0af7e32021-12-05T12:15:53ZPan-cancer analysis of non-oncogene addiction to DNA repair10.1038/s41598-021-02773-32045-2322https://doaj.org/article/0f2665cd6d9046259223d3a03c0af7e32021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02773-3https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Cancer cells usually depend on the aberrant function of one or few driver genes to initiate and promote their malignancy, an attribute known as oncogene addiction. However, cancer cells might become dependent on the normal cellular functions of certain genes that are not oncogenes but ensure cell survival (non-oncogene addiction). The downregulation or silencing of DNA repair genes and the consequent genetic and epigenetic instability is key to promote malignancy, but the activation of the DNA-damage response (DDR) has been shown to become a type of non-oncogene addiction that critically supports tumour survival. In the present study, a systematic evaluation of DNA repair addiction at the pan-cancer level was performed using data derived from The Cancer Dependency Map and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). From 241 DDR genes, 59 were identified as commonly essential in cancer cell lines. However, large differences were observed in terms of dependency scores in 423 cell lines and transcriptomic alterations across 18 cancer types. Among these 59 commonly essential genes, 14 genes were exclusively associated with better overall patient survival and 19 with worse overall survival. Notably, a specific molecular signature among the latter, characterized by DDR genes like UBE2T, RFC4, POLQ, BRIP1, and H2AFX showing the weakest dependency scores, but significant upregulation was strongly associated with worse survival. The present study supports the existence and importance of non-oncogenic addiction to DNA repair in cancer and may facilitate the identification of prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic opportunities.Luis Bermúdez-GuzmánNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Luis Bermúdez-Guzmán
Pan-cancer analysis of non-oncogene addiction to DNA repair
description Abstract Cancer cells usually depend on the aberrant function of one or few driver genes to initiate and promote their malignancy, an attribute known as oncogene addiction. However, cancer cells might become dependent on the normal cellular functions of certain genes that are not oncogenes but ensure cell survival (non-oncogene addiction). The downregulation or silencing of DNA repair genes and the consequent genetic and epigenetic instability is key to promote malignancy, but the activation of the DNA-damage response (DDR) has been shown to become a type of non-oncogene addiction that critically supports tumour survival. In the present study, a systematic evaluation of DNA repair addiction at the pan-cancer level was performed using data derived from The Cancer Dependency Map and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). From 241 DDR genes, 59 were identified as commonly essential in cancer cell lines. However, large differences were observed in terms of dependency scores in 423 cell lines and transcriptomic alterations across 18 cancer types. Among these 59 commonly essential genes, 14 genes were exclusively associated with better overall patient survival and 19 with worse overall survival. Notably, a specific molecular signature among the latter, characterized by DDR genes like UBE2T, RFC4, POLQ, BRIP1, and H2AFX showing the weakest dependency scores, but significant upregulation was strongly associated with worse survival. The present study supports the existence and importance of non-oncogenic addiction to DNA repair in cancer and may facilitate the identification of prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic opportunities.
format article
author Luis Bermúdez-Guzmán
author_facet Luis Bermúdez-Guzmán
author_sort Luis Bermúdez-Guzmán
title Pan-cancer analysis of non-oncogene addiction to DNA repair
title_short Pan-cancer analysis of non-oncogene addiction to DNA repair
title_full Pan-cancer analysis of non-oncogene addiction to DNA repair
title_fullStr Pan-cancer analysis of non-oncogene addiction to DNA repair
title_full_unstemmed Pan-cancer analysis of non-oncogene addiction to DNA repair
title_sort pan-cancer analysis of non-oncogene addiction to dna repair
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/0f2665cd6d9046259223d3a03c0af7e3
work_keys_str_mv AT luisbermudezguzman pancanceranalysisofnononcogeneaddictiontodnarepair
_version_ 1718372057959366656